老年人结肠内镜下粘膜下剥离术的安全性和有效性:对710例病变的大量西方分析。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Fares Ayoub, Mai Khalaf, Samanthika Sahasra Devalaraju, Tara Keihanian, Wasseem Skef, Salmaan Jawaid, Mohamed Othman
{"title":"老年人结肠内镜下粘膜下剥离术的安全性和有效性:对710例病变的大量西方分析。","authors":"Fares Ayoub, Mai Khalaf, Samanthika Sahasra Devalaraju, Tara Keihanian, Wasseem Skef, Salmaan Jawaid, Mohamed Othman","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is increasingly used for the management of laterally spreading colorectal lesions in the West. With increasing life expectancy and prevalence of colorectal neoplasia, ESD is frequently performed in the elderly. While ESD has been shown to be safe in elderly Eastern populations, there are key differences in endoscopist, patient, and lesion characteristics in the West. We investigated the safety and outcomes of colorectal ESD in a large Western cohort.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 710 colorectal lesions undergoing ESD at a tertiary medical center from July 2015 to November 2024. Patients were divided into 3 age groups: under 65 years (n=342), 65 to 75 years (n=272), and older than 75 years (n=96). Outcomes included en-bloc and R0 resection rates, procedural and postprocedural adverse events, and length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>En-bloc resection rates (87.4%, 80.9%, and 80.2%) and R0 resection rates (69.6%, 68%, and 61.5%) were comparable across the <65, 65 to 75, and ≥75 groups, respectively. Despite higher comorbidities and use of antithrombotics/anticoagulants in the elderly group, overall postprocedure adverse event rates were low and with no significant difference among groups (6.7%, 8.5%, and 6.3%) (P=0.651). A higher length of stay in the ≥75 group was noted compared with the <65, 65 to 75, respectively (1.1 d, vs. 0.6 and 0.5, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Colorectal ESD in Western elderly patients by expert endoscopists is safe and effective, with outcomes comparable to younger cohorts. This study supports ESD as a feasible option for managing colorectal neoplasms in an aging population.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Safety and Efficacy of Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the Elderly: A Large Western Analysis of 710 Lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Fares Ayoub, Mai Khalaf, Samanthika Sahasra Devalaraju, Tara Keihanian, Wasseem Skef, Salmaan Jawaid, Mohamed Othman\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is increasingly used for the management of laterally spreading colorectal lesions in the West. With increasing life expectancy and prevalence of colorectal neoplasia, ESD is frequently performed in the elderly. While ESD has been shown to be safe in elderly Eastern populations, there are key differences in endoscopist, patient, and lesion characteristics in the West. We investigated the safety and outcomes of colorectal ESD in a large Western cohort.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 710 colorectal lesions undergoing ESD at a tertiary medical center from July 2015 to November 2024. Patients were divided into 3 age groups: under 65 years (n=342), 65 to 75 years (n=272), and older than 75 years (n=96). Outcomes included en-bloc and R0 resection rates, procedural and postprocedural adverse events, and length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>En-bloc resection rates (87.4%, 80.9%, and 80.2%) and R0 resection rates (69.6%, 68%, and 61.5%) were comparable across the <65, 65 to 75, and ≥75 groups, respectively. Despite higher comorbidities and use of antithrombotics/anticoagulants in the elderly group, overall postprocedure adverse event rates were low and with no significant difference among groups (6.7%, 8.5%, and 6.3%) (P=0.651). A higher length of stay in the ≥75 group was noted compared with the <65, 65 to 75, respectively (1.1 d, vs. 0.6 and 0.5, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Colorectal ESD in Western elderly patients by expert endoscopists is safe and effective, with outcomes comparable to younger cohorts. This study supports ESD as a feasible option for managing colorectal neoplasms in an aging population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002213\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002213","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与研究目的:在西方,结肠内镜下粘膜下剥离术(ESD)越来越多地用于治疗结肠直肠病变的横向扩散。随着预期寿命的增加和结直肠肿瘤的流行,ESD经常在老年人中进行。虽然已证明ESD在东方老年人群中是安全的,但在西方,内窥镜医师、患者和病变特征存在关键差异。我们在一个大型西方队列中调查了结肠直肠ESD的安全性和结果。患者和方法:回顾性分析2015年7月至2024年11月在某三级医疗中心接受ESD治疗的710例结直肠病变。患者分为3个年龄组:65岁以下(n=342), 65 ~ 75岁(n=272), 75岁以上(n=96)。结果包括整体和R0切除率、术中和术后不良事件以及住院时间。结果:整体切除率(87.4%,80.9%和80.2%)和R0切除率(69.6%,68%和61.5%)在整个研究中具有可比性。结论:专家内镜下的西方老年患者结肠直肠ESD是安全有效的,其结果与年轻队列相当。本研究支持ESD作为治疗老年人群结直肠肿瘤的可行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Safety and Efficacy of Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the Elderly: A Large Western Analysis of 710 Lesions.

Background and study aims: Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is increasingly used for the management of laterally spreading colorectal lesions in the West. With increasing life expectancy and prevalence of colorectal neoplasia, ESD is frequently performed in the elderly. While ESD has been shown to be safe in elderly Eastern populations, there are key differences in endoscopist, patient, and lesion characteristics in the West. We investigated the safety and outcomes of colorectal ESD in a large Western cohort.

Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 710 colorectal lesions undergoing ESD at a tertiary medical center from July 2015 to November 2024. Patients were divided into 3 age groups: under 65 years (n=342), 65 to 75 years (n=272), and older than 75 years (n=96). Outcomes included en-bloc and R0 resection rates, procedural and postprocedural adverse events, and length of stay.

Results: En-bloc resection rates (87.4%, 80.9%, and 80.2%) and R0 resection rates (69.6%, 68%, and 61.5%) were comparable across the <65, 65 to 75, and ≥75 groups, respectively. Despite higher comorbidities and use of antithrombotics/anticoagulants in the elderly group, overall postprocedure adverse event rates were low and with no significant difference among groups (6.7%, 8.5%, and 6.3%) (P=0.651). A higher length of stay in the ≥75 group was noted compared with the <65, 65 to 75, respectively (1.1 d, vs. 0.6 and 0.5, P<0.001).

Conclusions: Colorectal ESD in Western elderly patients by expert endoscopists is safe and effective, with outcomes comparable to younger cohorts. This study supports ESD as a feasible option for managing colorectal neoplasms in an aging population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信