Catherine P Cheney, Luderve Rosier, Sarah Cantrell, Nathan M Thielman, Brian A Sullivan
{"title":"粪便免疫化学检测用于高收入国家以外的结直肠癌筛查:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Catherine P Cheney, Luderve Rosier, Sarah Cantrell, Nathan M Thielman, Brian A Sullivan","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Goal: </strong>Investigate fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for CRC screening outside high-income countries (HIC).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) is rising, but optimal screening strategies in resource-limited settings remain unclear. FIT is an evidence-based, low-cost modality for population-based CRC screening. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to better understand the diagnostic performance of FIT for detecting CRC among average-risk individuals living outside HICs.</p><p><strong>Study: </strong>A systematic search of studies conducted in LMICs, defined by the World Bank, was conducted on August 8, 2024. Studies were eligible if they assessed FIT as a diagnostic test for CRC in asymptomatic, average-risk participants. Pooled estimates for FIT sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a bivariate Bayesian statistical analysis (MetaBayesDTA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search returned 333 distinct studies. Of these, 263 were excluded after title and abstract screening. We reviewed 61 full texts with 7 meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. These studies were published between 2015 and 2022 and included 100,619 participants from Argentina, Brazil, China, Iran, and Thailand. Most used a FIT hemoglobin cutoff of 50 ng/mL (n=4). FIT return rate ranged from 78% to 99%, and positivity ranged from 2.1% to 29%. FIT sensitivity ranged from 55% to 92%, specificity from 71% to 94%, PPV from 2% to 16%, and NPV from 98% to 100%. After meta-analysis, pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity for CRC were 75% (95% CI: 64%-85%) and 89% (95% CI: 77%-95%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FIT-based CRC screening shows promise, but data was geographically limited to middle-income countries. This highlights the need for research evaluating screening modalities and completion of the screening continuum in LMICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening Outside High-income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Catherine P Cheney, Luderve Rosier, Sarah Cantrell, Nathan M Thielman, Brian A Sullivan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Goal: </strong>Investigate fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for CRC screening outside high-income countries (HIC).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) is rising, but optimal screening strategies in resource-limited settings remain unclear. FIT is an evidence-based, low-cost modality for population-based CRC screening. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to better understand the diagnostic performance of FIT for detecting CRC among average-risk individuals living outside HICs.</p><p><strong>Study: </strong>A systematic search of studies conducted in LMICs, defined by the World Bank, was conducted on August 8, 2024. Studies were eligible if they assessed FIT as a diagnostic test for CRC in asymptomatic, average-risk participants. Pooled estimates for FIT sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a bivariate Bayesian statistical analysis (MetaBayesDTA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search returned 333 distinct studies. Of these, 263 were excluded after title and abstract screening. We reviewed 61 full texts with 7 meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. These studies were published between 2015 and 2022 and included 100,619 participants from Argentina, Brazil, China, Iran, and Thailand. Most used a FIT hemoglobin cutoff of 50 ng/mL (n=4). FIT return rate ranged from 78% to 99%, and positivity ranged from 2.1% to 29%. FIT sensitivity ranged from 55% to 92%, specificity from 71% to 94%, PPV from 2% to 16%, and NPV from 98% to 100%. After meta-analysis, pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity for CRC were 75% (95% CI: 64%-85%) and 89% (95% CI: 77%-95%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FIT-based CRC screening shows promise, but data was geographically limited to middle-income countries. This highlights the need for research evaluating screening modalities and completion of the screening continuum in LMICs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002214\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002214","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening Outside High-income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Goal: Investigate fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for CRC screening outside high-income countries (HIC).
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) is rising, but optimal screening strategies in resource-limited settings remain unclear. FIT is an evidence-based, low-cost modality for population-based CRC screening. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to better understand the diagnostic performance of FIT for detecting CRC among average-risk individuals living outside HICs.
Study: A systematic search of studies conducted in LMICs, defined by the World Bank, was conducted on August 8, 2024. Studies were eligible if they assessed FIT as a diagnostic test for CRC in asymptomatic, average-risk participants. Pooled estimates for FIT sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a bivariate Bayesian statistical analysis (MetaBayesDTA).
Results: Our search returned 333 distinct studies. Of these, 263 were excluded after title and abstract screening. We reviewed 61 full texts with 7 meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria. These studies were published between 2015 and 2022 and included 100,619 participants from Argentina, Brazil, China, Iran, and Thailand. Most used a FIT hemoglobin cutoff of 50 ng/mL (n=4). FIT return rate ranged from 78% to 99%, and positivity ranged from 2.1% to 29%. FIT sensitivity ranged from 55% to 92%, specificity from 71% to 94%, PPV from 2% to 16%, and NPV from 98% to 100%. After meta-analysis, pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity for CRC were 75% (95% CI: 64%-85%) and 89% (95% CI: 77%-95%), respectively.
Conclusions: FIT-based CRC screening shows promise, but data was geographically limited to middle-income countries. This highlights the need for research evaluating screening modalities and completion of the screening continuum in LMICs.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.