采用生命周期HTA:一个肿瘤不可知论精确肿瘤指数经济评估从公开可获得的报销审查。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Gemma Cupples, Emanuel Krebs, Deirdre Weymann, Cheryl Ho, Dean A Regier
{"title":"采用生命周期HTA:一个肿瘤不可知论精确肿瘤指数经济评估从公开可获得的报销审查。","authors":"Gemma Cupples, Emanuel Krebs, Deirdre Weymann, Cheryl Ho, Dean A Regier","doi":"10.1017/S0266462325100111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Life-cycle health technology assessment (HTA) requires an index economic model to establish how estimated cost-effectiveness evolves with emerging evidence. We developed an open-source index economic evaluation of entrectinib, a tumor-agnostic therapy with conditional market authorization. Our objective was to replicate the initial HTA report from publicly available information, aiming to identify key operational and methodological aspects for operationalizing life-cycle decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used partitioned survival analysis to determine tumor-agnostic and tumor-specific cost-effectiveness, using publicly available HTA reviews for parameterization. We estimated incremental costs in 2021 Canadian and US dollars (CAD and USD) from a public-payer healthcare perspective, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental net monetary benefit (INMB). We assessed the impact of treatment effectiveness, extrapolation assumptions, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-third of the parameters (<i>n</i> = 30) were unavailable in the Canadian reimbursement review and were sourced from international reviews. Tumor-agnostic incremental costs were CAD 68,451 (95 percent confidence interval: 35,466, 92,155) and USD 54,608 (28,294, 73,518), and QALYs were 0.13 (-0.42, 0.42), yielding INMB CAD -55,803 at 100,000/QALY (USD -44,518). Full extrapolation of treatment effectiveness also yielded negative INMB (CAD -66,664). Inclusion of NGS costs diminished the expected value. Heterogeneity was considerable across tumor indications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed an open-source index economic evaluation to operationalize life-cycle HTA for a conditionally authorized tumor-agnostic therapy. Our findings outline key operational and methodological considerations necessary for the development of index economic models that support life-cycle HTA, offering insights into their potential integration into regular HTA and policy decision-making processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"e41"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12257039/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adopting life-cycle HTA: a tumor-agnostic precision oncology index economic evaluation from publicly available reimbursement reviews.\",\"authors\":\"Gemma Cupples, Emanuel Krebs, Deirdre Weymann, Cheryl Ho, Dean A Regier\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0266462325100111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Life-cycle health technology assessment (HTA) requires an index economic model to establish how estimated cost-effectiveness evolves with emerging evidence. We developed an open-source index economic evaluation of entrectinib, a tumor-agnostic therapy with conditional market authorization. Our objective was to replicate the initial HTA report from publicly available information, aiming to identify key operational and methodological aspects for operationalizing life-cycle decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used partitioned survival analysis to determine tumor-agnostic and tumor-specific cost-effectiveness, using publicly available HTA reviews for parameterization. We estimated incremental costs in 2021 Canadian and US dollars (CAD and USD) from a public-payer healthcare perspective, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental net monetary benefit (INMB). We assessed the impact of treatment effectiveness, extrapolation assumptions, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-third of the parameters (<i>n</i> = 30) were unavailable in the Canadian reimbursement review and were sourced from international reviews. Tumor-agnostic incremental costs were CAD 68,451 (95 percent confidence interval: 35,466, 92,155) and USD 54,608 (28,294, 73,518), and QALYs were 0.13 (-0.42, 0.42), yielding INMB CAD -55,803 at 100,000/QALY (USD -44,518). Full extrapolation of treatment effectiveness also yielded negative INMB (CAD -66,664). Inclusion of NGS costs diminished the expected value. Heterogeneity was considerable across tumor indications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed an open-source index economic evaluation to operationalize life-cycle HTA for a conditionally authorized tumor-agnostic therapy. Our findings outline key operational and methodological considerations necessary for the development of index economic models that support life-cycle HTA, offering insights into their potential integration into regular HTA and policy decision-making processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12257039/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462325100111\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462325100111","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:生命周期卫生技术评估(HTA)需要一个指数经济模型,以确定估计的成本效益如何随着新出现的证据而演变。我们开发了一个开放源代码的指数经济评估的恩替尼,肿瘤不可知的治疗有条件的市场授权。我们的目标是从公开信息中复制最初的HTA报告,旨在确定实施生命周期决策的关键操作和方法方面。方法:我们使用分区生存分析来确定肿瘤不可知性和肿瘤特异性的成本效益,使用公开可用的HTA评论进行参数化。我们从公共支付者医疗保健的角度、质量调整生命年(QALYs)和增量净货币效益(INMB)估算了2021年加元和美元(CAD和USD)的增量成本。我们评估了治疗效果、外推假设和下一代测序(NGS)成本的影响。结果:三分之一的参数(n = 30)在加拿大报销审查中不可用,并且来自国际审查。肿瘤不可知的增量成本分别为68,451加元(95%置信区间:35,466,92,155)和54,608美元(28,294,73,518),QALY为0.13(-0.42,0.42),每100,000/QALY(-44,518美元)产生-55,803加元。完全外推治疗效果也产生负INMB(-66,664)。纳入NGS成本降低了预期价值。肿瘤适应症的异质性相当大。结论:我们开发了一个开放源代码的指数经济评估,以操作生命周期HTA作为有条件批准的肿瘤不可知论治疗。我们的研究结果概述了开发支持生命周期HTA的指数经济模型所需的关键操作和方法考虑因素,并提供了将其整合到常规HTA和政策决策过程中的潜在见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Adopting life-cycle HTA: a tumor-agnostic precision oncology index economic evaluation from publicly available reimbursement reviews.

Adopting life-cycle HTA: a tumor-agnostic precision oncology index economic evaluation from publicly available reimbursement reviews.

Adopting life-cycle HTA: a tumor-agnostic precision oncology index economic evaluation from publicly available reimbursement reviews.

Adopting life-cycle HTA: a tumor-agnostic precision oncology index economic evaluation from publicly available reimbursement reviews.

Objectives: Life-cycle health technology assessment (HTA) requires an index economic model to establish how estimated cost-effectiveness evolves with emerging evidence. We developed an open-source index economic evaluation of entrectinib, a tumor-agnostic therapy with conditional market authorization. Our objective was to replicate the initial HTA report from publicly available information, aiming to identify key operational and methodological aspects for operationalizing life-cycle decision-making.

Methods: We used partitioned survival analysis to determine tumor-agnostic and tumor-specific cost-effectiveness, using publicly available HTA reviews for parameterization. We estimated incremental costs in 2021 Canadian and US dollars (CAD and USD) from a public-payer healthcare perspective, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental net monetary benefit (INMB). We assessed the impact of treatment effectiveness, extrapolation assumptions, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) costs.

Results: One-third of the parameters (n = 30) were unavailable in the Canadian reimbursement review and were sourced from international reviews. Tumor-agnostic incremental costs were CAD 68,451 (95 percent confidence interval: 35,466, 92,155) and USD 54,608 (28,294, 73,518), and QALYs were 0.13 (-0.42, 0.42), yielding INMB CAD -55,803 at 100,000/QALY (USD -44,518). Full extrapolation of treatment effectiveness also yielded negative INMB (CAD -66,664). Inclusion of NGS costs diminished the expected value. Heterogeneity was considerable across tumor indications.

Conclusions: We developed an open-source index economic evaluation to operationalize life-cycle HTA for a conditionally authorized tumor-agnostic therapy. Our findings outline key operational and methodological considerations necessary for the development of index economic models that support life-cycle HTA, offering insights into their potential integration into regular HTA and policy decision-making processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信