无内侧前额叶皮层的行为认知控制与海马信息加工。

IF 6.4 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
eLife Pub Date : 2025-06-23 DOI:10.7554/eLife.104475
Eun Hye Park, Kally C O'Reilly Sparks, Griffin Grubbs, David Taborga, Kyndall Nicholas, Armaan S Ahmed, Natalie Ruiz-Péreza, Natalie Kim, Simon Segura-Carrillo, André A Fenton
{"title":"无内侧前额叶皮层的行为认知控制与海马信息加工。","authors":"Eun Hye Park, Kally C O'Reilly Sparks, Griffin Grubbs, David Taborga, Kyndall Nicholas, Armaan S Ahmed, Natalie Ruiz-Péreza, Natalie Kim, Simon Segura-Carrillo, André A Fenton","doi":"10.7554/eLife.104475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive control tasks require using one class of information while ignoring competing classes of information. The central role of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in cognitive control is well established in the primate literature and largely accepted in the rodent literature because mPFC damage causes deficits in tasks that may require cognitive control, as inferred, typically from the task design. In prior work, we used an active place avoidance task where a rat or mouse on a rotating arena is required to avoid the stationary task-relevant locations of a mild shock and ignore the rotating task-irrelevant locations of those shocks. The task is impaired by hippocampal manipulations, and the discharge of hippocampal place cell populations judiciously alternates between representing stationary locations near the shock zone and rotating locations far from the shock zone, demonstrating cognitive control concurrently in behavior and the hippocampal representation of spatial information. Here, we test whether rat mPFC lesion impairs the active place avoidance task to evaluate two competing hypotheses, a 'central-computation' hypothesis that the mPFC is essential for the computations required for cognitive control and an alternative 'local-computation' hypothesis that other brain areas can perform the computations required for cognitive control, independent of mPFC. Ibotenic acid lesion of the mPFC was effective, damaging the cingulate, prelimbic, and infralimbic cortices. The lesion also altered the normal coordination of metabolic activity across remaining structures. The lesion did not impair learning to avoid the initial location of shock or long-term place avoidance memory, but impaired avoidance after the shock was relocated. The lesion also did not impair the alternation between task-relevant and task-irrelevant hippocampal representations of place information. These findings support the local-computation hypothesis that computations required for cognitive control can occur locally in brain networks independently of the mPFC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11640,"journal":{"name":"eLife","volume":"13 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive control of behavior and hippocampal information processing without medial prefrontal cortex.\",\"authors\":\"Eun Hye Park, Kally C O'Reilly Sparks, Griffin Grubbs, David Taborga, Kyndall Nicholas, Armaan S Ahmed, Natalie Ruiz-Péreza, Natalie Kim, Simon Segura-Carrillo, André A Fenton\",\"doi\":\"10.7554/eLife.104475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cognitive control tasks require using one class of information while ignoring competing classes of information. The central role of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in cognitive control is well established in the primate literature and largely accepted in the rodent literature because mPFC damage causes deficits in tasks that may require cognitive control, as inferred, typically from the task design. In prior work, we used an active place avoidance task where a rat or mouse on a rotating arena is required to avoid the stationary task-relevant locations of a mild shock and ignore the rotating task-irrelevant locations of those shocks. The task is impaired by hippocampal manipulations, and the discharge of hippocampal place cell populations judiciously alternates between representing stationary locations near the shock zone and rotating locations far from the shock zone, demonstrating cognitive control concurrently in behavior and the hippocampal representation of spatial information. Here, we test whether rat mPFC lesion impairs the active place avoidance task to evaluate two competing hypotheses, a 'central-computation' hypothesis that the mPFC is essential for the computations required for cognitive control and an alternative 'local-computation' hypothesis that other brain areas can perform the computations required for cognitive control, independent of mPFC. Ibotenic acid lesion of the mPFC was effective, damaging the cingulate, prelimbic, and infralimbic cortices. The lesion also altered the normal coordination of metabolic activity across remaining structures. The lesion did not impair learning to avoid the initial location of shock or long-term place avoidance memory, but impaired avoidance after the shock was relocated. The lesion also did not impair the alternation between task-relevant and task-irrelevant hippocampal representations of place information. These findings support the local-computation hypothesis that computations required for cognitive control can occur locally in brain networks independently of the mPFC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"eLife\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"eLife\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.104475\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eLife","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.104475","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认知控制任务需要使用一类信息,而忽略其他信息。内侧前额叶皮层(mPFC)在认知控制中的核心作用在灵长类动物的文献中得到了很好的确立,在啮齿动物的文献中也得到了广泛的认可,因为mPFC的损伤会导致可能需要认知控制的任务的缺陷,这通常是从任务设计中推断出来的。在之前的工作中,我们使用了一个主动的场所回避任务,在这个任务中,要求旋转舞台上的大鼠或小鼠避开与轻度电击相关的静止位置,并忽略与这些电击无关的旋转位置。海马位置细胞群的放电会在靠近冲击区的静止位置和远离冲击区的旋转位置之间明智地交替,这表明在行为和海马空间信息表征中同时存在认知控制。在这里,我们测试了大鼠mPFC损伤是否会损害主动地点回避任务,以评估两个相互竞争的假设,一个是“中央计算”假设,即mPFC对认知控制所需的计算至关重要,另一个是“局部计算”假设,即其他大脑区域可以独立于mPFC执行认知控制所需的计算。Ibotenic酸对mPFC的损伤是有效的,可损伤扣带、边缘前皮层和边缘下皮层。病变还改变了其余结构中代谢活动的正常协调。该病变不影响学习以避免休克的初始位置或长期避位记忆,但在休克重新定位后,避位记忆受损。这种损伤也没有损害与任务相关和与任务无关的海马体位置信息表征之间的交替。这些发现支持了局部计算假说,即认知控制所需的计算可以在独立于mPFC的大脑网络中局部发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive control of behavior and hippocampal information processing without medial prefrontal cortex.

Cognitive control tasks require using one class of information while ignoring competing classes of information. The central role of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in cognitive control is well established in the primate literature and largely accepted in the rodent literature because mPFC damage causes deficits in tasks that may require cognitive control, as inferred, typically from the task design. In prior work, we used an active place avoidance task where a rat or mouse on a rotating arena is required to avoid the stationary task-relevant locations of a mild shock and ignore the rotating task-irrelevant locations of those shocks. The task is impaired by hippocampal manipulations, and the discharge of hippocampal place cell populations judiciously alternates between representing stationary locations near the shock zone and rotating locations far from the shock zone, demonstrating cognitive control concurrently in behavior and the hippocampal representation of spatial information. Here, we test whether rat mPFC lesion impairs the active place avoidance task to evaluate two competing hypotheses, a 'central-computation' hypothesis that the mPFC is essential for the computations required for cognitive control and an alternative 'local-computation' hypothesis that other brain areas can perform the computations required for cognitive control, independent of mPFC. Ibotenic acid lesion of the mPFC was effective, damaging the cingulate, prelimbic, and infralimbic cortices. The lesion also altered the normal coordination of metabolic activity across remaining structures. The lesion did not impair learning to avoid the initial location of shock or long-term place avoidance memory, but impaired avoidance after the shock was relocated. The lesion also did not impair the alternation between task-relevant and task-irrelevant hippocampal representations of place information. These findings support the local-computation hypothesis that computations required for cognitive control can occur locally in brain networks independently of the mPFC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
eLife
eLife BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
3.90%
发文量
3122
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: eLife is a distinguished, not-for-profit, peer-reviewed open access scientific journal that specializes in the fields of biomedical and life sciences. eLife is known for its selective publication process, which includes a variety of article types such as: Research Articles: Detailed reports of original research findings. Short Reports: Concise presentations of significant findings that do not warrant a full-length research article. Tools and Resources: Descriptions of new tools, technologies, or resources that facilitate scientific research. Research Advances: Brief reports on significant scientific advancements that have immediate implications for the field. Scientific Correspondence: Short communications that comment on or provide additional information related to published articles. Review Articles: Comprehensive overviews of a specific topic or field within the life sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信