{"title":"2014年美国医疗补助扩张后按年龄组划分的年度结肠癌病例:一项差异研究。","authors":"Edgar Asiimwe, Folasade May, Eran Bendavid","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies examining the association between Medicaid expansion (ME) under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and colon cancer incidence have produced mixed results.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To re-visit the association between the ACA-ME and annual cases of colon cancer.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Difference-in-differences (DiD).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The primary analyses used data from the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2018, a hospital-based cancer registry in the USA. We also conducted exploratory analyses using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients aged 40 and older with newly diagnosed colon cancer.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The primary outcome was the percent change in colon cancer of all stages. Secondary outcomes were percent changes in stage I and stage IV cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among those aged 40-49, we observed a statistically significant greater increase in stage I colon cancer in expansion states relative to non-expansion states (DiD (percent change) 9.7% (95% CI, 2.5% to 17.4%)). In those aged 50-64, we did not observe statistically significant differences between the two state groups in any of the outcomes. Among those aged 65+, we observed a statistically significant relative decrease for all stages in ACA-ME states (-1.0% (95% CI, -1.0% to -3.0%)) and for stage IV (-3.0% (95% CI, -2.0% to -5.0%)). We explored our findings among younger individuals (<50) in trend plots comparing annual colorectal cancer cases to percent uninsured using SEER data and observed that increases in cases coincided with declining uninsurance in several states.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Post-ME, we observed a greater relative increase in colon cancer among those <50 in expansion states. Our exploratory analyses suggest that fewer barriers to healthcare post-ME may have contributed to these findings; additional studies are needed. We also observed relative decreases in the 65+ age group, corroborating previous reports of spillover benefits in expansion states.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 6","pages":"e099058"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12186053/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Annual cases of colon cancer by age group after Medicaid expansion in the USA in 2014: a difference-in-differences study.\",\"authors\":\"Edgar Asiimwe, Folasade May, Eran Bendavid\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies examining the association between Medicaid expansion (ME) under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and colon cancer incidence have produced mixed results.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To re-visit the association between the ACA-ME and annual cases of colon cancer.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Difference-in-differences (DiD).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The primary analyses used data from the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2018, a hospital-based cancer registry in the USA. We also conducted exploratory analyses using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients aged 40 and older with newly diagnosed colon cancer.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The primary outcome was the percent change in colon cancer of all stages. Secondary outcomes were percent changes in stage I and stage IV cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among those aged 40-49, we observed a statistically significant greater increase in stage I colon cancer in expansion states relative to non-expansion states (DiD (percent change) 9.7% (95% CI, 2.5% to 17.4%)). In those aged 50-64, we did not observe statistically significant differences between the two state groups in any of the outcomes. Among those aged 65+, we observed a statistically significant relative decrease for all stages in ACA-ME states (-1.0% (95% CI, -1.0% to -3.0%)) and for stage IV (-3.0% (95% CI, -2.0% to -5.0%)). We explored our findings among younger individuals (<50) in trend plots comparing annual colorectal cancer cases to percent uninsured using SEER data and observed that increases in cases coincided with declining uninsurance in several states.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Post-ME, we observed a greater relative increase in colon cancer among those <50 in expansion states. Our exploratory analyses suggest that fewer barriers to healthcare post-ME may have contributed to these findings; additional studies are needed. We also observed relative decreases in the 65+ age group, corroborating previous reports of spillover benefits in expansion states.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open\",\"volume\":\"15 6\",\"pages\":\"e099058\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12186053/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099058\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Annual cases of colon cancer by age group after Medicaid expansion in the USA in 2014: a difference-in-differences study.
Background: Studies examining the association between Medicaid expansion (ME) under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and colon cancer incidence have produced mixed results.
Objective: To re-visit the association between the ACA-ME and annual cases of colon cancer.
Design: Difference-in-differences (DiD).
Setting: The primary analyses used data from the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2018, a hospital-based cancer registry in the USA. We also conducted exploratory analyses using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry.
Patients: Patients aged 40 and older with newly diagnosed colon cancer.
Measurements: The primary outcome was the percent change in colon cancer of all stages. Secondary outcomes were percent changes in stage I and stage IV cases.
Results: Among those aged 40-49, we observed a statistically significant greater increase in stage I colon cancer in expansion states relative to non-expansion states (DiD (percent change) 9.7% (95% CI, 2.5% to 17.4%)). In those aged 50-64, we did not observe statistically significant differences between the two state groups in any of the outcomes. Among those aged 65+, we observed a statistically significant relative decrease for all stages in ACA-ME states (-1.0% (95% CI, -1.0% to -3.0%)) and for stage IV (-3.0% (95% CI, -2.0% to -5.0%)). We explored our findings among younger individuals (<50) in trend plots comparing annual colorectal cancer cases to percent uninsured using SEER data and observed that increases in cases coincided with declining uninsurance in several states.
Conclusion: Post-ME, we observed a greater relative increase in colon cancer among those <50 in expansion states. Our exploratory analyses suggest that fewer barriers to healthcare post-ME may have contributed to these findings; additional studies are needed. We also observed relative decreases in the 65+ age group, corroborating previous reports of spillover benefits in expansion states.
期刊介绍:
BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.