Si-Min Song, Qian-Min Liu, Xi Huang, Ping Chen, Min Tao, Xia Pei, Hua-Ning Wang, Yan Han, Jian-Guo Chen, Wei Hong, Zhang-Jin Zhang
{"title":"长期电针和重复经颅磁刺激对apnl - g- f小鼠阿尔茨海默病的进展有不同的减缓作用。","authors":"Si-Min Song, Qian-Min Liu, Xi Huang, Ping Chen, Min Tao, Xia Pei, Hua-Ning Wang, Yan Han, Jian-Guo Chen, Wei Hong, Zhang-Jin Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s13195-025-01781-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Both electroacupuncture (EA) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) possess the potential in combating the progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD). In this study, we compared the effects of the two regimens as early long-term intervention in App<sup>NL-G-F</sup> mice, a new amyloid precursor protein (APP) knock-in model that recapitulates multiple AD-associated pathologies, including amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques, microgliosis, astrocytosis, dendritic and synaptic degeneration. The 2-month-old freely moving model mice randomly received EA or rTMS for 2~3 sessions a week for 6 months. Cognitive tests were conducted in Y maze and Barnes maze sequentially at the age of 4, 6, and 8 months. The cortex and hippocampus were dissected thereafter for neurohistological and molecular analysis. Both regimens markedly prevented cognitive deterioration at 6 months old. EA maintained its significant prevention to 8 months old, but rTMS did not. At this age, EA remarkably reduced Aβ burdens with particular dense-core plaques; rTMS had similar effects on Aβ plaques, but not on dense-core plaques. Both regimens displayed greater suppression on microgliosis in the cortex than in the hippocampus, and equivalently inhibited astrocytosis in the two brain regions. While both EA and rTMS protected against dendritic degeneration surrounding Aβ plaques, EA further mitigated synaptic loss. These results demonstrated that EA produced more long-lasting and broad-acting effects than rTMS in alleviating memory impairment and pathological products of AD. EA could serve as an early long-term intervention and rTMS as adjuvant therapy in slowing the progression of AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":"17 1","pages":"140"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12183856/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term electroacupuncture and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation differentially slow the progression of Alzheimer's disease in App<sup>NL-G-F</sup> mice.\",\"authors\":\"Si-Min Song, Qian-Min Liu, Xi Huang, Ping Chen, Min Tao, Xia Pei, Hua-Ning Wang, Yan Han, Jian-Guo Chen, Wei Hong, Zhang-Jin Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13195-025-01781-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Both electroacupuncture (EA) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) possess the potential in combating the progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD). In this study, we compared the effects of the two regimens as early long-term intervention in App<sup>NL-G-F</sup> mice, a new amyloid precursor protein (APP) knock-in model that recapitulates multiple AD-associated pathologies, including amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques, microgliosis, astrocytosis, dendritic and synaptic degeneration. The 2-month-old freely moving model mice randomly received EA or rTMS for 2~3 sessions a week for 6 months. Cognitive tests were conducted in Y maze and Barnes maze sequentially at the age of 4, 6, and 8 months. The cortex and hippocampus were dissected thereafter for neurohistological and molecular analysis. Both regimens markedly prevented cognitive deterioration at 6 months old. EA maintained its significant prevention to 8 months old, but rTMS did not. At this age, EA remarkably reduced Aβ burdens with particular dense-core plaques; rTMS had similar effects on Aβ plaques, but not on dense-core plaques. Both regimens displayed greater suppression on microgliosis in the cortex than in the hippocampus, and equivalently inhibited astrocytosis in the two brain regions. While both EA and rTMS protected against dendritic degeneration surrounding Aβ plaques, EA further mitigated synaptic loss. These results demonstrated that EA produced more long-lasting and broad-acting effects than rTMS in alleviating memory impairment and pathological products of AD. EA could serve as an early long-term intervention and rTMS as adjuvant therapy in slowing the progression of AD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12183856/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-025-01781-z\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-025-01781-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
电针(EA)和重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)都具有对抗阿尔茨海默病(AD)进展的潜力。在这项研究中,我们比较了两种方案作为早期长期干预对AppNL-G-F小鼠的影响,AppNL-G-F是一种新的淀粉样前体蛋白(APP)敲入模型,概述了多种ad相关病理,包括淀粉样蛋白-β (a β)斑块、小胶质细胞增生、星形细胞增生、树突和突触变性。2月龄自由活动模型小鼠随机接受EA或rTMS治疗,每周2~3次,连续6个月。分别在4、6、8月龄时进行Y迷宫和Barnes迷宫的认知测试。随后解剖皮质和海马进行神经组织学和分子分析。两种方案都能显著防止6个月大时的认知退化。EA在8个月后仍保持着显著的预防效果,而rTMS却没有。在这个年龄,EA显著降低了具有特定致密核斑块的Aβ负担;rTMS对Aβ斑块有相似的作用,但对致密核斑块没有作用。两种治疗方案对皮质小胶质细胞增生的抑制作用都大于海马,对两个脑区星形细胞增生的抑制作用也相同。虽然EA和rTMS都能防止β斑块周围的树突变性,但EA进一步减轻了突触损失。这些结果表明,EA在缓解AD的记忆障碍和病理产物方面比rTMS具有更持久和更广泛的作用。EA可作为早期长期干预,rTMS可作为辅助治疗,减缓AD的进展。
Long-term electroacupuncture and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation differentially slow the progression of Alzheimer's disease in AppNL-G-F mice.
Both electroacupuncture (EA) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) possess the potential in combating the progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD). In this study, we compared the effects of the two regimens as early long-term intervention in AppNL-G-F mice, a new amyloid precursor protein (APP) knock-in model that recapitulates multiple AD-associated pathologies, including amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques, microgliosis, astrocytosis, dendritic and synaptic degeneration. The 2-month-old freely moving model mice randomly received EA or rTMS for 2~3 sessions a week for 6 months. Cognitive tests were conducted in Y maze and Barnes maze sequentially at the age of 4, 6, and 8 months. The cortex and hippocampus were dissected thereafter for neurohistological and molecular analysis. Both regimens markedly prevented cognitive deterioration at 6 months old. EA maintained its significant prevention to 8 months old, but rTMS did not. At this age, EA remarkably reduced Aβ burdens with particular dense-core plaques; rTMS had similar effects on Aβ plaques, but not on dense-core plaques. Both regimens displayed greater suppression on microgliosis in the cortex than in the hippocampus, and equivalently inhibited astrocytosis in the two brain regions. While both EA and rTMS protected against dendritic degeneration surrounding Aβ plaques, EA further mitigated synaptic loss. These results demonstrated that EA produced more long-lasting and broad-acting effects than rTMS in alleviating memory impairment and pathological products of AD. EA could serve as an early long-term intervention and rTMS as adjuvant therapy in slowing the progression of AD.
期刊介绍:
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal that focuses on translational research into Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. It publishes open-access basic research, clinical trials, drug discovery and development studies, and epidemiologic studies. The journal also includes reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, debates, and reports. All articles published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy are included in several reputable databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science) and Scopus.