利用环境协变量和机器学习算法在区域尺度上模拟土壤pH值。

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ramakrishnappa Vasundhara, Subramanian Dharumarajan, Rajendra Hegde, Pravash Chandra Moharana, Beeman Kalaiselvi, Hittanagi Prakash, Jujin Seema, Ayyappa Sathish, Neralikere Lakkappa Rajesh, Praveenkumar Naikodi, Nitin Patil
{"title":"利用环境协变量和机器学习算法在区域尺度上模拟土壤pH值。","authors":"Ramakrishnappa Vasundhara,&nbsp;Subramanian Dharumarajan,&nbsp;Rajendra Hegde,&nbsp;Pravash Chandra Moharana,&nbsp;Beeman Kalaiselvi,&nbsp;Hittanagi Prakash,&nbsp;Jujin Seema,&nbsp;Ayyappa Sathish,&nbsp;Neralikere Lakkappa Rajesh,&nbsp;Praveenkumar Naikodi,&nbsp;Nitin Patil","doi":"10.1007/s10661-025-14254-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Soil pH serves as a critical indicator of soil chemistry and fertility, and mapping its spatial distribution holds significant importance for effective crop management. Digital soil mapping (DSM) is a commonly employed method for making rapid and cost-effective quantitative predictions of soil properties and soil classes. In the present study, we mapped soil pH (0–15 cm) on a regional scale in Karnataka using a combination of various environmental variables. Three distinct machine learning models, namely support vector machine (SVM), Cubist, and random forest (RF), were assessed using a dataset of 146,044 observations collected under various projects. The environmental covariates used for soil pH prediction encompassed terrain attributes, Landsat-8 data, vegetation indices, and climatic variables. Among these models, RF model exhibited the most acceptable results for predicting soil pH (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup><sub>val</sub> = 0.61, CCC<sub>val</sub> = 0.74, RMSE<sub>val</sub> = 0.66). On the other hand, the Cubist and SVM models displayed comparatively lower accuracy, explaining only about 46–49% of the variation. The inclusion of climatic variables and Landsat-8 data emerged as crucial factors for predicting soil pH. The study successfully produced high-resolution maps of soil pH for the entire state at a 90-m resolution, while also quantifying the associated uncertainty. These high-resolution maps have the potential to be valuable for decision-makers, stakeholders, and agricultural practitioners towards precision agriculture and land resource management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"197 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling Soil pH at regional scale using environmental covariates and machine learning algorithm\",\"authors\":\"Ramakrishnappa Vasundhara,&nbsp;Subramanian Dharumarajan,&nbsp;Rajendra Hegde,&nbsp;Pravash Chandra Moharana,&nbsp;Beeman Kalaiselvi,&nbsp;Hittanagi Prakash,&nbsp;Jujin Seema,&nbsp;Ayyappa Sathish,&nbsp;Neralikere Lakkappa Rajesh,&nbsp;Praveenkumar Naikodi,&nbsp;Nitin Patil\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10661-025-14254-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Soil pH serves as a critical indicator of soil chemistry and fertility, and mapping its spatial distribution holds significant importance for effective crop management. Digital soil mapping (DSM) is a commonly employed method for making rapid and cost-effective quantitative predictions of soil properties and soil classes. In the present study, we mapped soil pH (0–15 cm) on a regional scale in Karnataka using a combination of various environmental variables. Three distinct machine learning models, namely support vector machine (SVM), Cubist, and random forest (RF), were assessed using a dataset of 146,044 observations collected under various projects. The environmental covariates used for soil pH prediction encompassed terrain attributes, Landsat-8 data, vegetation indices, and climatic variables. Among these models, RF model exhibited the most acceptable results for predicting soil pH (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup><sub>val</sub> = 0.61, CCC<sub>val</sub> = 0.74, RMSE<sub>val</sub> = 0.66). On the other hand, the Cubist and SVM models displayed comparatively lower accuracy, explaining only about 46–49% of the variation. The inclusion of climatic variables and Landsat-8 data emerged as crucial factors for predicting soil pH. The study successfully produced high-resolution maps of soil pH for the entire state at a 90-m resolution, while also quantifying the associated uncertainty. These high-resolution maps have the potential to be valuable for decision-makers, stakeholders, and agricultural practitioners towards precision agriculture and land resource management.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment\",\"volume\":\"197 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-025-14254-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-025-14254-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤pH值是土壤化学和肥力的重要指标,其空间分布对作物有效管理具有重要意义。数字土壤制图(DSM)是一种常用的方法,用于快速和经济有效地定量预测土壤性质和土壤类别。在本研究中,我们利用各种环境变量的组合在卡纳塔克邦的区域尺度上绘制了土壤pH值(0-15 cm)。三种不同的机器学习模型,即支持向量机(SVM)、立体主义(Cubist)和随机森林(RF),使用在不同项目下收集的146,044个观测数据集进行评估。用于土壤pH预测的环境协变量包括地形属性、Landsat-8数据、植被指数和气候变量。其中,RF模型对土壤pH的预测结果最为理想(R2val = 0.61, CCCval = 0.74, RMSEval = 0.66)。另一方面,Cubist和SVM模型的准确率相对较低,只能解释大约46-49%的变化。包括气候变量和Landsat-8数据成为预测土壤pH的关键因素。该研究成功地以90米的分辨率制作了整个州的土壤pH的高分辨率地图,同时还量化了相关的不确定性。这些高分辨率地图对决策者、利益相关者和农业从业者在精准农业和土地资源管理方面具有潜在的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modeling Soil pH at regional scale using environmental covariates and machine learning algorithm

Soil pH serves as a critical indicator of soil chemistry and fertility, and mapping its spatial distribution holds significant importance for effective crop management. Digital soil mapping (DSM) is a commonly employed method for making rapid and cost-effective quantitative predictions of soil properties and soil classes. In the present study, we mapped soil pH (0–15 cm) on a regional scale in Karnataka using a combination of various environmental variables. Three distinct machine learning models, namely support vector machine (SVM), Cubist, and random forest (RF), were assessed using a dataset of 146,044 observations collected under various projects. The environmental covariates used for soil pH prediction encompassed terrain attributes, Landsat-8 data, vegetation indices, and climatic variables. Among these models, RF model exhibited the most acceptable results for predicting soil pH (R2val = 0.61, CCCval = 0.74, RMSEval = 0.66). On the other hand, the Cubist and SVM models displayed comparatively lower accuracy, explaining only about 46–49% of the variation. The inclusion of climatic variables and Landsat-8 data emerged as crucial factors for predicting soil pH. The study successfully produced high-resolution maps of soil pH for the entire state at a 90-m resolution, while also quantifying the associated uncertainty. These high-resolution maps have the potential to be valuable for decision-makers, stakeholders, and agricultural practitioners towards precision agriculture and land resource management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信