{"title":"利用环境协变量和机器学习算法在区域尺度上模拟土壤pH值。","authors":"Ramakrishnappa Vasundhara, Subramanian Dharumarajan, Rajendra Hegde, Pravash Chandra Moharana, Beeman Kalaiselvi, Hittanagi Prakash, Jujin Seema, Ayyappa Sathish, Neralikere Lakkappa Rajesh, Praveenkumar Naikodi, Nitin Patil","doi":"10.1007/s10661-025-14254-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Soil pH serves as a critical indicator of soil chemistry and fertility, and mapping its spatial distribution holds significant importance for effective crop management. Digital soil mapping (DSM) is a commonly employed method for making rapid and cost-effective quantitative predictions of soil properties and soil classes. In the present study, we mapped soil pH (0–15 cm) on a regional scale in Karnataka using a combination of various environmental variables. Three distinct machine learning models, namely support vector machine (SVM), Cubist, and random forest (RF), were assessed using a dataset of 146,044 observations collected under various projects. The environmental covariates used for soil pH prediction encompassed terrain attributes, Landsat-8 data, vegetation indices, and climatic variables. Among these models, RF model exhibited the most acceptable results for predicting soil pH (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup><sub>val</sub> = 0.61, CCC<sub>val</sub> = 0.74, RMSE<sub>val</sub> = 0.66). On the other hand, the Cubist and SVM models displayed comparatively lower accuracy, explaining only about 46–49% of the variation. The inclusion of climatic variables and Landsat-8 data emerged as crucial factors for predicting soil pH. The study successfully produced high-resolution maps of soil pH for the entire state at a 90-m resolution, while also quantifying the associated uncertainty. These high-resolution maps have the potential to be valuable for decision-makers, stakeholders, and agricultural practitioners towards precision agriculture and land resource management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"197 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling Soil pH at regional scale using environmental covariates and machine learning algorithm\",\"authors\":\"Ramakrishnappa Vasundhara, Subramanian Dharumarajan, Rajendra Hegde, Pravash Chandra Moharana, Beeman Kalaiselvi, Hittanagi Prakash, Jujin Seema, Ayyappa Sathish, Neralikere Lakkappa Rajesh, Praveenkumar Naikodi, Nitin Patil\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10661-025-14254-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Soil pH serves as a critical indicator of soil chemistry and fertility, and mapping its spatial distribution holds significant importance for effective crop management. Digital soil mapping (DSM) is a commonly employed method for making rapid and cost-effective quantitative predictions of soil properties and soil classes. In the present study, we mapped soil pH (0–15 cm) on a regional scale in Karnataka using a combination of various environmental variables. Three distinct machine learning models, namely support vector machine (SVM), Cubist, and random forest (RF), were assessed using a dataset of 146,044 observations collected under various projects. The environmental covariates used for soil pH prediction encompassed terrain attributes, Landsat-8 data, vegetation indices, and climatic variables. Among these models, RF model exhibited the most acceptable results for predicting soil pH (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup><sub>val</sub> = 0.61, CCC<sub>val</sub> = 0.74, RMSE<sub>val</sub> = 0.66). On the other hand, the Cubist and SVM models displayed comparatively lower accuracy, explaining only about 46–49% of the variation. The inclusion of climatic variables and Landsat-8 data emerged as crucial factors for predicting soil pH. The study successfully produced high-resolution maps of soil pH for the entire state at a 90-m resolution, while also quantifying the associated uncertainty. These high-resolution maps have the potential to be valuable for decision-makers, stakeholders, and agricultural practitioners towards precision agriculture and land resource management.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment\",\"volume\":\"197 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-025-14254-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-025-14254-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Modeling Soil pH at regional scale using environmental covariates and machine learning algorithm
Soil pH serves as a critical indicator of soil chemistry and fertility, and mapping its spatial distribution holds significant importance for effective crop management. Digital soil mapping (DSM) is a commonly employed method for making rapid and cost-effective quantitative predictions of soil properties and soil classes. In the present study, we mapped soil pH (0–15 cm) on a regional scale in Karnataka using a combination of various environmental variables. Three distinct machine learning models, namely support vector machine (SVM), Cubist, and random forest (RF), were assessed using a dataset of 146,044 observations collected under various projects. The environmental covariates used for soil pH prediction encompassed terrain attributes, Landsat-8 data, vegetation indices, and climatic variables. Among these models, RF model exhibited the most acceptable results for predicting soil pH (R2val = 0.61, CCCval = 0.74, RMSEval = 0.66). On the other hand, the Cubist and SVM models displayed comparatively lower accuracy, explaining only about 46–49% of the variation. The inclusion of climatic variables and Landsat-8 data emerged as crucial factors for predicting soil pH. The study successfully produced high-resolution maps of soil pH for the entire state at a 90-m resolution, while also quantifying the associated uncertainty. These high-resolution maps have the potential to be valuable for decision-makers, stakeholders, and agricultural practitioners towards precision agriculture and land resource management.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.