{"title":"“意识”可以从大型语言模型(LLM)内部状态观察到吗?运用综合信息理论和广度表征分析方法对心理理论测试的法学硕士表征进行剖析","authors":"Jingkai Li","doi":"10.1016/j.nlp.2025.100163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Integrated Information Theory (IIT) provides a quantitative framework for explaining consciousness phenomenon, positing that conscious systems comprise elements integrated through causal properties. We apply IIT 3.0 and 4.0 — the latest iterations of this framework — to sequences of Large Language Model (LLM) representations, analyzing data derived from existing Theory of Mind (ToM) test results. Our study systematically investigates whether the differences of ToM test performances, when presented in the LLM representations, can be revealed by IIT estimates, i.e., <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>Φ</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>max</mo></mrow></msup></math></span> (IIT 3.0), <span><math><mi>Φ</mi></math></span> (IIT 4.0), Conceptual Information (IIT 3.0), and <span><math><mi>Φ</mi></math></span>-structure (IIT 4.0). Furthermore, we compare these metrics with the Span Representations independent of any estimate for consciousness. This additional effort aims to differentiate between potential “consciousness” phenomena and inherent separations within LLM representational space. We conduct comprehensive experiments examining variations across LLM transformer layers and linguistic spans from stimuli. Our results suggest that sequences of contemporary Transformer-based LLM representations lack statistically significant indicators of observed “consciousness” phenomena but exhibit intriguing patterns under <em>spatio</em>-permutational analyses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100944,"journal":{"name":"Natural Language Processing Journal","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can “consciousness” be observed from large language model (LLM) internal states? Dissecting LLM representations obtained from Theory of Mind test with Integrated Information Theory and Span Representation analysis\",\"authors\":\"Jingkai Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nlp.2025.100163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Integrated Information Theory (IIT) provides a quantitative framework for explaining consciousness phenomenon, positing that conscious systems comprise elements integrated through causal properties. We apply IIT 3.0 and 4.0 — the latest iterations of this framework — to sequences of Large Language Model (LLM) representations, analyzing data derived from existing Theory of Mind (ToM) test results. Our study systematically investigates whether the differences of ToM test performances, when presented in the LLM representations, can be revealed by IIT estimates, i.e., <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>Φ</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>max</mo></mrow></msup></math></span> (IIT 3.0), <span><math><mi>Φ</mi></math></span> (IIT 4.0), Conceptual Information (IIT 3.0), and <span><math><mi>Φ</mi></math></span>-structure (IIT 4.0). Furthermore, we compare these metrics with the Span Representations independent of any estimate for consciousness. This additional effort aims to differentiate between potential “consciousness” phenomena and inherent separations within LLM representational space. We conduct comprehensive experiments examining variations across LLM transformer layers and linguistic spans from stimuli. Our results suggest that sequences of contemporary Transformer-based LLM representations lack statistically significant indicators of observed “consciousness” phenomena but exhibit intriguing patterns under <em>spatio</em>-permutational analyses.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Natural Language Processing Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Natural Language Processing Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949719125000391\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Language Processing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949719125000391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Can “consciousness” be observed from large language model (LLM) internal states? Dissecting LLM representations obtained from Theory of Mind test with Integrated Information Theory and Span Representation analysis
Integrated Information Theory (IIT) provides a quantitative framework for explaining consciousness phenomenon, positing that conscious systems comprise elements integrated through causal properties. We apply IIT 3.0 and 4.0 — the latest iterations of this framework — to sequences of Large Language Model (LLM) representations, analyzing data derived from existing Theory of Mind (ToM) test results. Our study systematically investigates whether the differences of ToM test performances, when presented in the LLM representations, can be revealed by IIT estimates, i.e., (IIT 3.0), (IIT 4.0), Conceptual Information (IIT 3.0), and -structure (IIT 4.0). Furthermore, we compare these metrics with the Span Representations independent of any estimate for consciousness. This additional effort aims to differentiate between potential “consciousness” phenomena and inherent separations within LLM representational space. We conduct comprehensive experiments examining variations across LLM transformer layers and linguistic spans from stimuli. Our results suggest that sequences of contemporary Transformer-based LLM representations lack statistically significant indicators of observed “consciousness” phenomena but exhibit intriguing patterns under spatio-permutational analyses.