零售商应该选择提前销售策略吗?资本受限的供应链视角

IF 6.7 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Yajing Wang , Jian Li , Shichao Zhu , Shouyang Wang , T.C.E. Cheng
{"title":"零售商应该选择提前销售策略吗?资本受限的供应链视角","authors":"Yajing Wang ,&nbsp;Jian Li ,&nbsp;Shichao Zhu ,&nbsp;Shouyang Wang ,&nbsp;T.C.E. Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2025.103380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><strong>Problem Definition and Methodology:</strong> The practice of some enterprises using Internet platforms/e-commerce platforms to raise funds for purchasing/producing products through the implementation of advance selling has received widespread attention. Consumer-oriented advance selling financing has emerged as a new financing tool. However, it is evident that not all capital-constrained retailers adopt advance selling financing because of possible influences from upstream producers. Accordingly, we apply a game-theoretic approach to discern how advance selling impacts all stakeholders and the overall performance. The producer first charges the purchasing price, and subsequent inventory financing decisions lie with the retailer, who may opt for trade credit alone (TC), advance selling alone (AS), or a combination of both (AT), assuming the producer offers delayed payments to its downstream.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>We find that when adopting the advance selling financing strategy, the retailer should offer consumers an early purchase price discount. When a capital-constrained retailer adopts the advance selling financing strategy, it needs to consider the number of informed consumers. When there are relatively few informed consumers and the product cost is low to moderate, the producer tends to set a lower wholesale price to encourage the retailer to adopt AT to optimize the cash flow. On the contrary, the producer raises the price, prompting the retailer to rely on TC. However, when there are more informed consumers, the retailer is more inclined to adopt AS. At this time, the producer’s pricing strategy cannot influence the retailer’s choice, leaving the producer in a passive position. This indicates that the advance selling strategy is not always beneficial to the producer in a capital-constrained decentralized supply chain, which is inconsistent with the situation in a well-funded supply chain. The model is then extended to a stochastic demand scenario, where, in the context of a large scale of informed consumers, the randomness of market demand significantly alters the revenue structure between the retailer and the producer.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 103380"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should a retailer opt for an advance selling strategy? Perspectives from a capital-constrained supply chain\",\"authors\":\"Yajing Wang ,&nbsp;Jian Li ,&nbsp;Shichao Zhu ,&nbsp;Shouyang Wang ,&nbsp;T.C.E. Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.omega.2025.103380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><strong>Problem Definition and Methodology:</strong> The practice of some enterprises using Internet platforms/e-commerce platforms to raise funds for purchasing/producing products through the implementation of advance selling has received widespread attention. Consumer-oriented advance selling financing has emerged as a new financing tool. However, it is evident that not all capital-constrained retailers adopt advance selling financing because of possible influences from upstream producers. Accordingly, we apply a game-theoretic approach to discern how advance selling impacts all stakeholders and the overall performance. The producer first charges the purchasing price, and subsequent inventory financing decisions lie with the retailer, who may opt for trade credit alone (TC), advance selling alone (AS), or a combination of both (AT), assuming the producer offers delayed payments to its downstream.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>We find that when adopting the advance selling financing strategy, the retailer should offer consumers an early purchase price discount. When a capital-constrained retailer adopts the advance selling financing strategy, it needs to consider the number of informed consumers. When there are relatively few informed consumers and the product cost is low to moderate, the producer tends to set a lower wholesale price to encourage the retailer to adopt AT to optimize the cash flow. On the contrary, the producer raises the price, prompting the retailer to rely on TC. However, when there are more informed consumers, the retailer is more inclined to adopt AS. At this time, the producer’s pricing strategy cannot influence the retailer’s choice, leaving the producer in a passive position. This indicates that the advance selling strategy is not always beneficial to the producer in a capital-constrained decentralized supply chain, which is inconsistent with the situation in a well-funded supply chain. The model is then extended to a stochastic demand scenario, where, in the context of a large scale of informed consumers, the randomness of market demand significantly alters the revenue structure between the retailer and the producer.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"volume\":\"138 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048325001069\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048325001069","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题定义与方法:一些企业利用互联网平台/电子商务平台通过实施预售来筹集购买/生产产品的资金的做法受到了广泛关注。面向消费者的预售融资作为一种新型的融资工具应运而生。然而,显然并非所有资金受限的零售商都采用预付款融资,因为可能受到上游生产商的影响。因此,我们运用博弈论的方法来辨别提前销售如何影响所有利益相关者和整体绩效。生产商首先收取采购价格,随后的库存融资决策取决于零售商,零售商可能选择单独的贸易信贷(TC),单独的预售(AS),或两者的组合(AT),假设生产商向其下游提供延迟付款。结果:我们发现零售商在采用提前销售融资策略时,应给予消费者提前购买价格折扣。当资金受限的零售商采用提前销售融资策略时,需要考虑知情消费者的数量。当知情消费者相对较少,产品成本处于低到中等水平时,生产者倾向于设定较低的批发价格,以鼓励零售商采用AT来优化现金流。相反,生产商提高价格,促使零售商依赖TC。然而,当有更多知情的消费者时,零售商更倾向于采用AS。此时,生产者的定价策略无法影响零售商的选择,生产者处于被动地位。这表明,在资金受限的分散供应链中,提前销售策略并不总是对生产者有利,这与资金充足的供应链中的情况不一致。然后将该模型扩展到随机需求场景,其中,在大量知情消费者的背景下,市场需求的随机性显着改变了零售商和生产商之间的收入结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Should a retailer opt for an advance selling strategy? Perspectives from a capital-constrained supply chain
Problem Definition and Methodology: The practice of some enterprises using Internet platforms/e-commerce platforms to raise funds for purchasing/producing products through the implementation of advance selling has received widespread attention. Consumer-oriented advance selling financing has emerged as a new financing tool. However, it is evident that not all capital-constrained retailers adopt advance selling financing because of possible influences from upstream producers. Accordingly, we apply a game-theoretic approach to discern how advance selling impacts all stakeholders and the overall performance. The producer first charges the purchasing price, and subsequent inventory financing decisions lie with the retailer, who may opt for trade credit alone (TC), advance selling alone (AS), or a combination of both (AT), assuming the producer offers delayed payments to its downstream.

Results:

We find that when adopting the advance selling financing strategy, the retailer should offer consumers an early purchase price discount. When a capital-constrained retailer adopts the advance selling financing strategy, it needs to consider the number of informed consumers. When there are relatively few informed consumers and the product cost is low to moderate, the producer tends to set a lower wholesale price to encourage the retailer to adopt AT to optimize the cash flow. On the contrary, the producer raises the price, prompting the retailer to rely on TC. However, when there are more informed consumers, the retailer is more inclined to adopt AS. At this time, the producer’s pricing strategy cannot influence the retailer’s choice, leaving the producer in a passive position. This indicates that the advance selling strategy is not always beneficial to the producer in a capital-constrained decentralized supply chain, which is inconsistent with the situation in a well-funded supply chain. The model is then extended to a stochastic demand scenario, where, in the context of a large scale of informed consumers, the randomness of market demand significantly alters the revenue structure between the retailer and the producer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Omega-international Journal of Management Science
Omega-international Journal of Management Science 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
11.60%
发文量
130
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信