自动驾驶训练:一个范围审查使用教学设计和学习原则在当前的训练研究

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Albraa A. Rajkhan, Wayne C.W. Giang
{"title":"自动驾驶训练:一个范围审查使用教学设计和学习原则在当前的训练研究","authors":"Albraa A. Rajkhan,&nbsp;Wayne C.W. Giang","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.06.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and Automated Driving Systems (ADS) become increasingly prevalent in vehicles, there is a critical need to ensure that drivers are effectively trained to use these technologies safely. This scoping review examines how learning and instructional design principles are addressed in current ADAS/ADS training research. We assessed literature from the past 20 years, focusing on how research on training interventions address learner engagement, knowledge acquisition, and skills development. A content representation classification taxonomy was introduced alongside an analysis of six dimensions: use of instructional design frameworks, training purpose, training content topics, content representation, training styles, and learner differences. The analysis revealed that while some training practices effectively align with educational principles, significant gaps remain. Our findings identify three key themes: the evolution of training objectives and interventions, the alignment of training content with appropriate knowledge types and delivery methods, and the need for specifically tailored training for distinct populations. This synthesis can guide future training developments, making a crucial impact on user competence and safety outcomes in automated driving systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"114 ","pages":"Pages 665-685"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated driving training: a scoping review examining the use of instructional design and learning principles in current training research\",\"authors\":\"Albraa A. Rajkhan,&nbsp;Wayne C.W. Giang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trf.2025.06.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and Automated Driving Systems (ADS) become increasingly prevalent in vehicles, there is a critical need to ensure that drivers are effectively trained to use these technologies safely. This scoping review examines how learning and instructional design principles are addressed in current ADAS/ADS training research. We assessed literature from the past 20 years, focusing on how research on training interventions address learner engagement, knowledge acquisition, and skills development. A content representation classification taxonomy was introduced alongside an analysis of six dimensions: use of instructional design frameworks, training purpose, training content topics, content representation, training styles, and learner differences. The analysis revealed that while some training practices effectively align with educational principles, significant gaps remain. Our findings identify three key themes: the evolution of training objectives and interventions, the alignment of training content with appropriate knowledge types and delivery methods, and the need for specifically tailored training for distinct populations. This synthesis can guide future training developments, making a crucial impact on user competence and safety outcomes in automated driving systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"volume\":\"114 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 665-685\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136984782500230X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136984782500230X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着高级驾驶辅助系统(ADAS)和自动驾驶系统(ADS)在车辆中越来越普遍,迫切需要确保驾驶员接受有效的培训,以安全地使用这些技术。本综述探讨了当前ADAS/ADS培训研究中如何处理学习和教学设计原则。我们评估了过去20年的文献,重点关注培训干预研究如何解决学习者参与、知识获取和技能发展问题。介绍了内容表示分类分类法,并对六个维度进行了分析:教学设计框架的使用、培训目的、培训内容主题、内容表示、培训风格和学习者差异。分析显示,虽然一些培训实践有效地符合教育原则,但仍存在重大差距。我们的研究结果确定了三个关键主题:培训目标和干预措施的演变,培训内容与适当的知识类型和交付方法的一致性,以及为不同人群量身定制培训的必要性。这种综合可以指导未来的培训发展,对自动驾驶系统的用户能力和安全结果产生至关重要的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automated driving training: a scoping review examining the use of instructional design and learning principles in current training research
As Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and Automated Driving Systems (ADS) become increasingly prevalent in vehicles, there is a critical need to ensure that drivers are effectively trained to use these technologies safely. This scoping review examines how learning and instructional design principles are addressed in current ADAS/ADS training research. We assessed literature from the past 20 years, focusing on how research on training interventions address learner engagement, knowledge acquisition, and skills development. A content representation classification taxonomy was introduced alongside an analysis of six dimensions: use of instructional design frameworks, training purpose, training content topics, content representation, training styles, and learner differences. The analysis revealed that while some training practices effectively align with educational principles, significant gaps remain. Our findings identify three key themes: the evolution of training objectives and interventions, the alignment of training content with appropriate knowledge types and delivery methods, and the need for specifically tailored training for distinct populations. This synthesis can guide future training developments, making a crucial impact on user competence and safety outcomes in automated driving systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信