{"title":"自动驾驶训练:一个范围审查使用教学设计和学习原则在当前的训练研究","authors":"Albraa A. Rajkhan, Wayne C.W. Giang","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.06.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and Automated Driving Systems (ADS) become increasingly prevalent in vehicles, there is a critical need to ensure that drivers are effectively trained to use these technologies safely. This scoping review examines how learning and instructional design principles are addressed in current ADAS/ADS training research. We assessed literature from the past 20 years, focusing on how research on training interventions address learner engagement, knowledge acquisition, and skills development. A content representation classification taxonomy was introduced alongside an analysis of six dimensions: use of instructional design frameworks, training purpose, training content topics, content representation, training styles, and learner differences. The analysis revealed that while some training practices effectively align with educational principles, significant gaps remain. Our findings identify three key themes: the evolution of training objectives and interventions, the alignment of training content with appropriate knowledge types and delivery methods, and the need for specifically tailored training for distinct populations. This synthesis can guide future training developments, making a crucial impact on user competence and safety outcomes in automated driving systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"114 ","pages":"Pages 665-685"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated driving training: a scoping review examining the use of instructional design and learning principles in current training research\",\"authors\":\"Albraa A. Rajkhan, Wayne C.W. Giang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trf.2025.06.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and Automated Driving Systems (ADS) become increasingly prevalent in vehicles, there is a critical need to ensure that drivers are effectively trained to use these technologies safely. This scoping review examines how learning and instructional design principles are addressed in current ADAS/ADS training research. We assessed literature from the past 20 years, focusing on how research on training interventions address learner engagement, knowledge acquisition, and skills development. A content representation classification taxonomy was introduced alongside an analysis of six dimensions: use of instructional design frameworks, training purpose, training content topics, content representation, training styles, and learner differences. The analysis revealed that while some training practices effectively align with educational principles, significant gaps remain. Our findings identify three key themes: the evolution of training objectives and interventions, the alignment of training content with appropriate knowledge types and delivery methods, and the need for specifically tailored training for distinct populations. This synthesis can guide future training developments, making a crucial impact on user competence and safety outcomes in automated driving systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"volume\":\"114 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 665-685\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136984782500230X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136984782500230X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
Automated driving training: a scoping review examining the use of instructional design and learning principles in current training research
As Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and Automated Driving Systems (ADS) become increasingly prevalent in vehicles, there is a critical need to ensure that drivers are effectively trained to use these technologies safely. This scoping review examines how learning and instructional design principles are addressed in current ADAS/ADS training research. We assessed literature from the past 20 years, focusing on how research on training interventions address learner engagement, knowledge acquisition, and skills development. A content representation classification taxonomy was introduced alongside an analysis of six dimensions: use of instructional design frameworks, training purpose, training content topics, content representation, training styles, and learner differences. The analysis revealed that while some training practices effectively align with educational principles, significant gaps remain. Our findings identify three key themes: the evolution of training objectives and interventions, the alignment of training content with appropriate knowledge types and delivery methods, and the need for specifically tailored training for distinct populations. This synthesis can guide future training developments, making a crucial impact on user competence and safety outcomes in automated driving systems.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.