{"title":"全身麻醉期间基于体重指数的呼气末正压调整:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Helene Selpien,Jann Penon,David Thunecke,Dirk Schädler,Ingmar Lautenschläger,Henning Ohnesorge,Christine Eimer,Caroline Wolf,Armin Sablewski,Tobias Becher","doi":"10.1111/anae.16656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\r\nLung-protective ventilation is essential for preventing postoperative pulmonary complications. While maintaining a low driving pressure and optimising PEEP is of importance, the ideal strategy remains contentious. This study evaluated whether adjusting PEEP based on BMI, compared with standard PEEP, could reduce driving pressure and peri-operative loss of lung aeration.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe conducted a randomised controlled, patient-blinded, single-centre superiority trial with two parallel groups. Adult patients undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia who required tracheal intubation were assigned randomly to either standardised PEEP (PEEP = 5 cmH2O; group PEEP-5) or PEEP set according to BMI (PEEP = BMI/3 cmH2O; group PEEP-BMI/3). Patients' lungs were ventilated using a volume-controlled mode with tidal volumes of 7 ml.kg-1 predicted body weight. Lung aeration scores were assessed using ultrasound pre- and postoperatively.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nSixty patients were enrolled and allocated randomly. Adjustment of PEEP according to BMI/3 was associated with a significantly lower driving pressure, with a median (IQR [range]) of 8.9 (7.1-10.4 [5.2-14.9]) cmH2O in group PEEP-5 and 7.9 (7.2-8.5 [5.9-14.1]) cmH2O in group PEEP-BMI/3 (p = 0.027) and higher mean (SD) respiratory system compliance (group PEEP-5, 0.83 (0.20) ml cmH2O-1 kg-1 predicted body weight vs. group PEEP-BMI/3, 0.95 (0.17) ml cmH2O-1 kg-1 predicted body weight; p = 0.020). Lung ultrasound revealed a reduced postoperative loss of lung aeration in patients allocated to the BMI/3 group. Patients allocated to the BMI-adjusted group required less supplemental oxygen, had less newly developed atelectasis and had higher oxygen saturations upon arrival in the post-anaesthesia care unit.\r\n\r\nDISCUSSION\r\nIn patients without major pulmonary disease who were undergoing non-cardiothoracic surgeries with tracheal intubation, adjusting PEEP based on a calculation of BMI/3 improved lung mechanics and reduced postoperative loss of lung aeration. This approach provides a straightforward and pragmatic method for individualising PEEP in patients undergoing general anaesthesia.","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adjustment of positive end-expiratory pressure based on body mass index during general anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Helene Selpien,Jann Penon,David Thunecke,Dirk Schädler,Ingmar Lautenschläger,Henning Ohnesorge,Christine Eimer,Caroline Wolf,Armin Sablewski,Tobias Becher\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/anae.16656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION\\r\\nLung-protective ventilation is essential for preventing postoperative pulmonary complications. While maintaining a low driving pressure and optimising PEEP is of importance, the ideal strategy remains contentious. This study evaluated whether adjusting PEEP based on BMI, compared with standard PEEP, could reduce driving pressure and peri-operative loss of lung aeration.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nWe conducted a randomised controlled, patient-blinded, single-centre superiority trial with two parallel groups. Adult patients undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia who required tracheal intubation were assigned randomly to either standardised PEEP (PEEP = 5 cmH2O; group PEEP-5) or PEEP set according to BMI (PEEP = BMI/3 cmH2O; group PEEP-BMI/3). Patients' lungs were ventilated using a volume-controlled mode with tidal volumes of 7 ml.kg-1 predicted body weight. Lung aeration scores were assessed using ultrasound pre- and postoperatively.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nSixty patients were enrolled and allocated randomly. Adjustment of PEEP according to BMI/3 was associated with a significantly lower driving pressure, with a median (IQR [range]) of 8.9 (7.1-10.4 [5.2-14.9]) cmH2O in group PEEP-5 and 7.9 (7.2-8.5 [5.9-14.1]) cmH2O in group PEEP-BMI/3 (p = 0.027) and higher mean (SD) respiratory system compliance (group PEEP-5, 0.83 (0.20) ml cmH2O-1 kg-1 predicted body weight vs. group PEEP-BMI/3, 0.95 (0.17) ml cmH2O-1 kg-1 predicted body weight; p = 0.020). Lung ultrasound revealed a reduced postoperative loss of lung aeration in patients allocated to the BMI/3 group. Patients allocated to the BMI-adjusted group required less supplemental oxygen, had less newly developed atelectasis and had higher oxygen saturations upon arrival in the post-anaesthesia care unit.\\r\\n\\r\\nDISCUSSION\\r\\nIn patients without major pulmonary disease who were undergoing non-cardiothoracic surgeries with tracheal intubation, adjusting PEEP based on a calculation of BMI/3 improved lung mechanics and reduced postoperative loss of lung aeration. This approach provides a straightforward and pragmatic method for individualising PEEP in patients undergoing general anaesthesia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16656\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16656","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Adjustment of positive end-expiratory pressure based on body mass index during general anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial.
INTRODUCTION
Lung-protective ventilation is essential for preventing postoperative pulmonary complications. While maintaining a low driving pressure and optimising PEEP is of importance, the ideal strategy remains contentious. This study evaluated whether adjusting PEEP based on BMI, compared with standard PEEP, could reduce driving pressure and peri-operative loss of lung aeration.
METHODS
We conducted a randomised controlled, patient-blinded, single-centre superiority trial with two parallel groups. Adult patients undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia who required tracheal intubation were assigned randomly to either standardised PEEP (PEEP = 5 cmH2O; group PEEP-5) or PEEP set according to BMI (PEEP = BMI/3 cmH2O; group PEEP-BMI/3). Patients' lungs were ventilated using a volume-controlled mode with tidal volumes of 7 ml.kg-1 predicted body weight. Lung aeration scores were assessed using ultrasound pre- and postoperatively.
RESULTS
Sixty patients were enrolled and allocated randomly. Adjustment of PEEP according to BMI/3 was associated with a significantly lower driving pressure, with a median (IQR [range]) of 8.9 (7.1-10.4 [5.2-14.9]) cmH2O in group PEEP-5 and 7.9 (7.2-8.5 [5.9-14.1]) cmH2O in group PEEP-BMI/3 (p = 0.027) and higher mean (SD) respiratory system compliance (group PEEP-5, 0.83 (0.20) ml cmH2O-1 kg-1 predicted body weight vs. group PEEP-BMI/3, 0.95 (0.17) ml cmH2O-1 kg-1 predicted body weight; p = 0.020). Lung ultrasound revealed a reduced postoperative loss of lung aeration in patients allocated to the BMI/3 group. Patients allocated to the BMI-adjusted group required less supplemental oxygen, had less newly developed atelectasis and had higher oxygen saturations upon arrival in the post-anaesthesia care unit.
DISCUSSION
In patients without major pulmonary disease who were undergoing non-cardiothoracic surgeries with tracheal intubation, adjusting PEEP based on a calculation of BMI/3 improved lung mechanics and reduced postoperative loss of lung aeration. This approach provides a straightforward and pragmatic method for individualising PEEP in patients undergoing general anaesthesia.
期刊介绍:
The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.