Thomas Cash,Araz Marachelian,Steven G DuBois,Yueh-Yun Chi,Anahit Baregamyan,Susan G Groshen,Hunter C Jonus,Anasheh Shamirian,Mary Crowley,Fariba Goodarzian,Patricia T Acharya,Bruce Pawel,Amy K Erbe,Ankita Shahi,Jen Zaborek,Eleanor Kennedy,Shahab Asgharzadeh,Judith G Villablanca,Navin Pinto,Brian D Weiss,Yael P Mosse,Ami V Desai,Margaret E Macy,Meaghan Granger,Kieuhoa T Vo,Paul M Sondel,Katherine K Matthay,Julie R Park,Kelly C Goldsmith
{"title":"131 - metaiodobenzylguanidine联合地努妥昔单抗±伏立诺他治疗复发或难治性神经母细胞瘤的I期研究:神经母细胞瘤治疗的新途径","authors":"Thomas Cash,Araz Marachelian,Steven G DuBois,Yueh-Yun Chi,Anahit Baregamyan,Susan G Groshen,Hunter C Jonus,Anasheh Shamirian,Mary Crowley,Fariba Goodarzian,Patricia T Acharya,Bruce Pawel,Amy K Erbe,Ankita Shahi,Jen Zaborek,Eleanor Kennedy,Shahab Asgharzadeh,Judith G Villablanca,Navin Pinto,Brian D Weiss,Yael P Mosse,Ami V Desai,Margaret E Macy,Meaghan Granger,Kieuhoa T Vo,Paul M Sondel,Katherine K Matthay,Julie R Park,Kelly C Goldsmith","doi":"10.1200/jco-24-02612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nWe conducted a phase I trial to determine the safety, tolerability, and preliminary antitumor activity of 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) combined with the anti-GD2 antibody dinutuximab with or without the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat in patients with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma (rNBL).\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nIn part A, patients with MIBG-avid rNBL received MIBG intravenously (IV) on day 1 at 12, 15, or 18 mCi/kg per the rolling six design and dinutuximab (17.5 mg/m2 once daily) IV on days 8-11 and 29-32 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (250 mcg/m2 once daily) subcutaneously on days 8-17 and 29-38. Autologous stem cells were infused on day 15. In part B, vorinostat at 180 mg/m2 once daily was given orally on days 0-13 in combination with the part A recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Patients could receive two courses.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nForty-five eligible patients enrolled, of whom 31 were evaluable. The median age was 7.5 (range, 2.9-24.1) years. For part A (n = 19), no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred across all dose levels and courses, establishing the RP2D of MIBG to be 18 mCi/kg. In part B (n = 12), 1 DLT (grade 3 hypokalemia) occurred during course 1, and 3 of 11 patients who received a second course experienced DLT: grade 3 ALT increase, grade 4 hypoxia and grade 5 pneumonitis, and grade 3 fatigue. The best overall response rate (BORR; complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) on part A was 42% with a CR/PR/minor response (MR) rate of 46%, and 19% progressive disease (PD) rate. For part B, the BORR was 42% with a CR/PR/MR rate of 75% and 0% PD rate.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nMIBG combined with dinutuximab was well tolerated with encouraging antitumor activity. Vorinostat added to this combination may augment responses in this heavily pretreated patient population.","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":"19 1","pages":"JCO2402612"},"PeriodicalIF":41.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phase I Study of 131I-Metaiodobenzylguanidine With Dinutuximab ± Vorinostat for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma: A New Approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Cash,Araz Marachelian,Steven G DuBois,Yueh-Yun Chi,Anahit Baregamyan,Susan G Groshen,Hunter C Jonus,Anasheh Shamirian,Mary Crowley,Fariba Goodarzian,Patricia T Acharya,Bruce Pawel,Amy K Erbe,Ankita Shahi,Jen Zaborek,Eleanor Kennedy,Shahab Asgharzadeh,Judith G Villablanca,Navin Pinto,Brian D Weiss,Yael P Mosse,Ami V Desai,Margaret E Macy,Meaghan Granger,Kieuhoa T Vo,Paul M Sondel,Katherine K Matthay,Julie R Park,Kelly C Goldsmith\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/jco-24-02612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE\\r\\nWe conducted a phase I trial to determine the safety, tolerability, and preliminary antitumor activity of 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) combined with the anti-GD2 antibody dinutuximab with or without the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat in patients with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma (rNBL).\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nIn part A, patients with MIBG-avid rNBL received MIBG intravenously (IV) on day 1 at 12, 15, or 18 mCi/kg per the rolling six design and dinutuximab (17.5 mg/m2 once daily) IV on days 8-11 and 29-32 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (250 mcg/m2 once daily) subcutaneously on days 8-17 and 29-38. Autologous stem cells were infused on day 15. In part B, vorinostat at 180 mg/m2 once daily was given orally on days 0-13 in combination with the part A recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Patients could receive two courses.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nForty-five eligible patients enrolled, of whom 31 were evaluable. The median age was 7.5 (range, 2.9-24.1) years. For part A (n = 19), no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred across all dose levels and courses, establishing the RP2D of MIBG to be 18 mCi/kg. In part B (n = 12), 1 DLT (grade 3 hypokalemia) occurred during course 1, and 3 of 11 patients who received a second course experienced DLT: grade 3 ALT increase, grade 4 hypoxia and grade 5 pneumonitis, and grade 3 fatigue. The best overall response rate (BORR; complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) on part A was 42% with a CR/PR/minor response (MR) rate of 46%, and 19% progressive disease (PD) rate. For part B, the BORR was 42% with a CR/PR/MR rate of 75% and 0% PD rate.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nMIBG combined with dinutuximab was well tolerated with encouraging antitumor activity. Vorinostat added to this combination may augment responses in this heavily pretreated patient population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"JCO2402612\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":41.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/jco-24-02612\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/jco-24-02612","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Phase I Study of 131I-Metaiodobenzylguanidine With Dinutuximab ± Vorinostat for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma: A New Approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy Trial.
PURPOSE
We conducted a phase I trial to determine the safety, tolerability, and preliminary antitumor activity of 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) combined with the anti-GD2 antibody dinutuximab with or without the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat in patients with relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma (rNBL).
METHODS
In part A, patients with MIBG-avid rNBL received MIBG intravenously (IV) on day 1 at 12, 15, or 18 mCi/kg per the rolling six design and dinutuximab (17.5 mg/m2 once daily) IV on days 8-11 and 29-32 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (250 mcg/m2 once daily) subcutaneously on days 8-17 and 29-38. Autologous stem cells were infused on day 15. In part B, vorinostat at 180 mg/m2 once daily was given orally on days 0-13 in combination with the part A recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Patients could receive two courses.
RESULTS
Forty-five eligible patients enrolled, of whom 31 were evaluable. The median age was 7.5 (range, 2.9-24.1) years. For part A (n = 19), no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred across all dose levels and courses, establishing the RP2D of MIBG to be 18 mCi/kg. In part B (n = 12), 1 DLT (grade 3 hypokalemia) occurred during course 1, and 3 of 11 patients who received a second course experienced DLT: grade 3 ALT increase, grade 4 hypoxia and grade 5 pneumonitis, and grade 3 fatigue. The best overall response rate (BORR; complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) on part A was 42% with a CR/PR/minor response (MR) rate of 46%, and 19% progressive disease (PD) rate. For part B, the BORR was 42% with a CR/PR/MR rate of 75% and 0% PD rate.
CONCLUSION
MIBG combined with dinutuximab was well tolerated with encouraging antitumor activity. Vorinostat added to this combination may augment responses in this heavily pretreated patient population.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.