8周救生员救援训练后游泳技术和体能变化的探索性研究。

IF 0.8
Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics Pub Date : 2025-06-16 Print Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.37190/abb-02531-2024-03
Piotr Makar, Grzegorz Bielec, Dariusz Skalski, Damian Kowalski, Alicja Pęczak-Graczyk, Igor Grygus, Aleksandra Kisilewicz
{"title":"8周救生员救援训练后游泳技术和体能变化的探索性研究。","authors":"Piotr Makar, Grzegorz Bielec, Dariusz Skalski, Damian Kowalski, Alicja Pęczak-Graczyk, Igor Grygus, Aleksandra Kisilewicz","doi":"10.37190/abb-02531-2024-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Purpose</i>: Every lifeguard undergoes numerous tests that aim to check, among others, strength, speed, resistance etc., which is finally verified by a rescue action without equipment. The level of mastering elements of the swimming technique and swimming kinematics is a key element to succeed in swiftly reaching the drowning person which is limited by the time needed for drowning. The aim of this study was two-fold: (i) to analyze the variations of swimming kinematics after 8-weeks of lifeguard training, and (ii) to analyze the relationships between changes in kinematic outcomes and swimming performance over 25 and 100 meters. <i>Methods</i>: Six lifeguard candidates (age: 21.0 ± 1.09 years old; three female and three male students) voluntarily participated in this study. The 4 × 25-m freestyle test and a 100-m freestyle tests were performed twice (before and after 8-week training period). The tests were video-recorded and the following kinematic variables were calculated: swimming velocity, stroke frequency, stroke length and stroke index. <i>Results</i>: No significant changes in kinematic variables were observed. However, a strong correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.83) occurred between the swimming velocity of the 4 × 25 m test and the finish velocity of the 100 m test. The stroke index of the 4 × 25 m test was strongly correlated with the swimming velocity of the 100 m test (<i>r</i> = 0.89). <i>Conclusions</i>: Although lifeguard training did not improve swimming kinematics, it is worthwhile using training methods to check the preparation level of a lifeguard to ensure that he/she is properly trained to help people drowning in water bodies.</p>","PeriodicalId":519996,"journal":{"name":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","volume":"27 1","pages":"111-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in swimming technique and physical performance after 8 weeks of lifeguard rescue training: an exploratory study.\",\"authors\":\"Piotr Makar, Grzegorz Bielec, Dariusz Skalski, Damian Kowalski, Alicja Pęczak-Graczyk, Igor Grygus, Aleksandra Kisilewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.37190/abb-02531-2024-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Purpose</i>: Every lifeguard undergoes numerous tests that aim to check, among others, strength, speed, resistance etc., which is finally verified by a rescue action without equipment. The level of mastering elements of the swimming technique and swimming kinematics is a key element to succeed in swiftly reaching the drowning person which is limited by the time needed for drowning. The aim of this study was two-fold: (i) to analyze the variations of swimming kinematics after 8-weeks of lifeguard training, and (ii) to analyze the relationships between changes in kinematic outcomes and swimming performance over 25 and 100 meters. <i>Methods</i>: Six lifeguard candidates (age: 21.0 ± 1.09 years old; three female and three male students) voluntarily participated in this study. The 4 × 25-m freestyle test and a 100-m freestyle tests were performed twice (before and after 8-week training period). The tests were video-recorded and the following kinematic variables were calculated: swimming velocity, stroke frequency, stroke length and stroke index. <i>Results</i>: No significant changes in kinematic variables were observed. However, a strong correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.83) occurred between the swimming velocity of the 4 × 25 m test and the finish velocity of the 100 m test. The stroke index of the 4 × 25 m test was strongly correlated with the swimming velocity of the 100 m test (<i>r</i> = 0.89). <i>Conclusions</i>: Although lifeguard training did not improve swimming kinematics, it is worthwhile using training methods to check the preparation level of a lifeguard to ensure that he/she is properly trained to help people drowning in water bodies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"111-118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37190/abb-02531-2024-03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37190/abb-02531-2024-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:每个救生员都要经过多次测试,目的是检查力量、速度、阻力等,最终通过无装备的救援行动来验证。游泳技术和游泳运动学要素的掌握水平是迅速到达溺水者身边的关键因素,而溺水者所需要的时间是有限的。本研究的目的有两个方面:(i)分析救生员训练8周后游泳运动学的变化,(ii)分析运动结果的变化与25米和100米游泳成绩之间的关系。方法:6名救生员候选人(年龄:21.0±1.09岁;三名女学生和三名男学生)自愿参加了这项研究。4 × 25米自由泳测试和100米自由泳测试分别进行两次(8周训练前后)。对实验过程进行录像,并计算游泳速度、划水频率、划水长度和划水指数。结果:运动变量未见明显变化。而4 × 25米游泳速度与100米游泳终点速度之间存在很强的相关关系(r = 0.83)。4 × 25米游泳项目的划水指数与100米游泳项目的游泳速度呈显著正相关(r = 0.89)。结论:虽然救生员训练并没有提高游泳运动学水平,但通过训练方法检查救生员的准备水平是值得的,以确保他/她得到适当的训练来帮助在水体中溺水的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in swimming technique and physical performance after 8 weeks of lifeguard rescue training: an exploratory study.

Purpose: Every lifeguard undergoes numerous tests that aim to check, among others, strength, speed, resistance etc., which is finally verified by a rescue action without equipment. The level of mastering elements of the swimming technique and swimming kinematics is a key element to succeed in swiftly reaching the drowning person which is limited by the time needed for drowning. The aim of this study was two-fold: (i) to analyze the variations of swimming kinematics after 8-weeks of lifeguard training, and (ii) to analyze the relationships between changes in kinematic outcomes and swimming performance over 25 and 100 meters. Methods: Six lifeguard candidates (age: 21.0 ± 1.09 years old; three female and three male students) voluntarily participated in this study. The 4 × 25-m freestyle test and a 100-m freestyle tests were performed twice (before and after 8-week training period). The tests were video-recorded and the following kinematic variables were calculated: swimming velocity, stroke frequency, stroke length and stroke index. Results: No significant changes in kinematic variables were observed. However, a strong correlation (r = 0.83) occurred between the swimming velocity of the 4 × 25 m test and the finish velocity of the 100 m test. The stroke index of the 4 × 25 m test was strongly correlated with the swimming velocity of the 100 m test (r = 0.89). Conclusions: Although lifeguard training did not improve swimming kinematics, it is worthwhile using training methods to check the preparation level of a lifeguard to ensure that he/she is properly trained to help people drowning in water bodies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信