Brunella Zizolfi, Virginia Foreste, Maria Giuseppina Trinchillo, Danilo Borrelli, Alessandra Gallo, Maria Chiara De Angelis, Fabiola Nardelli, Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo
{"title":"虚拟现实技术在See & Treat宫腔镜时代的影响:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Brunella Zizolfi, Virginia Foreste, Maria Giuseppina Trinchillo, Danilo Borrelli, Alessandra Gallo, Maria Chiara De Angelis, Fabiola Nardelli, Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo","doi":"10.52054/FVVO.2025.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the context of outpatient hysteroscopy (OPH), performing a single procedure integrating the operative and diagnostic part is known as \"See & Treat hysteroscopy\". The virtual reality (VR) technology provides an immersive virtual environment that can provide a non-invasive analgesic. To date, there is limited evidence regarding its use in the OPH setting.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of VR technology for pain and anxiety management in OPH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Unblinded, prospective, randomised controlled trial, conducted at the Hysteroscopy Unit of the University of Naples \"Federico II\" between May and July 2024. Women aged 18-70 years, indicated for OPH, were randomised into a control group (standard OPH care) and an intervention group (OPH care with the addition of a VR headset).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Pain and anxiety were assessed through subjective measures: numerical rating scale (NRS) scores before and after the procedure, and objective measures: heart and respiratory rate pre- and during the procedure. Satisfaction, time, and success rates were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 116 women were enrolled. The VR group compared to the control group reported significantly lower mean standard deviation NRS scores for pain [3.9 (2.7) vs. 5.4 (3.0); mean difference 1.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4 to 2.5] and anxiety [3.2 (2.1) vs. 4.8 (2.8); mean difference 1.6, 95% CI 0.7 to 2.5] respectively. Regarding satisfaction, 96.5% of the VR group would use the headset again, whereas 3.5% requested its removal. All women in the control group desired a distraction. No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VR technology proved feasible and effective for pain and anxiety management in OPH, particularly during operative procedures.</p><p><strong>What is new?: </strong>Its use can support the implementation of the See & Treat philosophy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46400,"journal":{"name":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of virtual reality technology in the era of See & Treat hysteroscopy: a randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Brunella Zizolfi, Virginia Foreste, Maria Giuseppina Trinchillo, Danilo Borrelli, Alessandra Gallo, Maria Chiara De Angelis, Fabiola Nardelli, Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo\",\"doi\":\"10.52054/FVVO.2025.48\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the context of outpatient hysteroscopy (OPH), performing a single procedure integrating the operative and diagnostic part is known as \\\"See & Treat hysteroscopy\\\". The virtual reality (VR) technology provides an immersive virtual environment that can provide a non-invasive analgesic. To date, there is limited evidence regarding its use in the OPH setting.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of VR technology for pain and anxiety management in OPH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Unblinded, prospective, randomised controlled trial, conducted at the Hysteroscopy Unit of the University of Naples \\\"Federico II\\\" between May and July 2024. Women aged 18-70 years, indicated for OPH, were randomised into a control group (standard OPH care) and an intervention group (OPH care with the addition of a VR headset).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Pain and anxiety were assessed through subjective measures: numerical rating scale (NRS) scores before and after the procedure, and objective measures: heart and respiratory rate pre- and during the procedure. Satisfaction, time, and success rates were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 116 women were enrolled. The VR group compared to the control group reported significantly lower mean standard deviation NRS scores for pain [3.9 (2.7) vs. 5.4 (3.0); mean difference 1.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4 to 2.5] and anxiety [3.2 (2.1) vs. 4.8 (2.8); mean difference 1.6, 95% CI 0.7 to 2.5] respectively. Regarding satisfaction, 96.5% of the VR group would use the headset again, whereas 3.5% requested its removal. All women in the control group desired a distraction. No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VR technology proved feasible and effective for pain and anxiety management in OPH, particularly during operative procedures.</p><p><strong>What is new?: </strong>Its use can support the implementation of the See & Treat philosophy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.2025.48\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.2025.48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在门诊宫腔镜(OPH)的背景下,进行手术和诊断部分相结合的单一程序被称为“看治疗宫腔镜”。虚拟现实(VR)技术提供了一个身临其境的虚拟环境,可以提供非侵入性镇痛。迄今为止,关于其在OPH环境中的使用证据有限。目的:评价虚拟现实技术在OPH患者疼痛和焦虑管理中的可行性和有效性。方法:非盲、前瞻性、随机对照试验,于2024年5月至7月在那不勒斯大学“费德里科二世”宫腔镜科室进行。年龄在18-70岁、有OPH适应症的女性被随机分为对照组(标准OPH护理)和干预组(OPH护理加VR耳机)。主要观察指标:通过主观测量:术前和术后数值评定量表(NRS)评分和客观测量:术前和术中心率和呼吸率来评估疼痛和焦虑。满意度、时间和成功率也进行了评估。结果:总共有116名女性入组。与对照组相比,VR组疼痛的平均标准偏差NRS评分显著降低[3.9(2.7)比5.4 (3.0);平均差异1.5,95%可信区间(CI) 0.4至2.5]和焦虑[3.2(2.1)对4.8 (2.8);平均差异1.6,95% CI 0.7 ~ 2.5]。在满意度方面,96.5%的VR组会再次使用耳机,而3.5%的人要求将其移除。控制组的所有女性都想分散注意力。无严重不良事件报告。结论:虚拟现实技术被证明是OPH疼痛和焦虑管理的可行和有效的,特别是在手术过程中。有什么新鲜事吗?它的使用可以支持See & Treat哲学的实施。
The impact of virtual reality technology in the era of See & Treat hysteroscopy: a randomised controlled trial.
Background: In the context of outpatient hysteroscopy (OPH), performing a single procedure integrating the operative and diagnostic part is known as "See & Treat hysteroscopy". The virtual reality (VR) technology provides an immersive virtual environment that can provide a non-invasive analgesic. To date, there is limited evidence regarding its use in the OPH setting.
Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of VR technology for pain and anxiety management in OPH.
Methods: Unblinded, prospective, randomised controlled trial, conducted at the Hysteroscopy Unit of the University of Naples "Federico II" between May and July 2024. Women aged 18-70 years, indicated for OPH, were randomised into a control group (standard OPH care) and an intervention group (OPH care with the addition of a VR headset).
Main outcome measures: Pain and anxiety were assessed through subjective measures: numerical rating scale (NRS) scores before and after the procedure, and objective measures: heart and respiratory rate pre- and during the procedure. Satisfaction, time, and success rates were also evaluated.
Results: Overall, 116 women were enrolled. The VR group compared to the control group reported significantly lower mean standard deviation NRS scores for pain [3.9 (2.7) vs. 5.4 (3.0); mean difference 1.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4 to 2.5] and anxiety [3.2 (2.1) vs. 4.8 (2.8); mean difference 1.6, 95% CI 0.7 to 2.5] respectively. Regarding satisfaction, 96.5% of the VR group would use the headset again, whereas 3.5% requested its removal. All women in the control group desired a distraction. No serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusions: VR technology proved feasible and effective for pain and anxiety management in OPH, particularly during operative procedures.
What is new?: Its use can support the implementation of the See & Treat philosophy.