教育对患有神经系统疾病的成年人的疲劳有什么影响?系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-22 DOI:10.1177/02692155251351510
Alex Delbridge, Owen Howlett, Coralie English, Dawn B Simpson
{"title":"教育对患有神经系统疾病的成年人的疲劳有什么影响?系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Alex Delbridge, Owen Howlett, Coralie English, Dawn B Simpson","doi":"10.1177/02692155251351510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo determine the effect of education programs on fatigue outcomes in people with neurological conditions.Data sourcesMEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PEDRO until May 2025, according to PRISMA guidelines.Review methodsSystematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing education versus no education/other intervention on the outcome of fatigue for people with neurological conditions. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Pooled effects were calculated using standard mean difference (SMD).ResultsWe included 19 clinical trials of education for fatigue (<i>n</i> = 1970 participants) in five different neurological conditions. Education duration ranged from 4 to 12 weeks, 79% (<i>n</i> = 15) of trials included people with multiple sclerosis and 18% (<i>n</i> = 3) included people with stroke. Most education (11 trials, 58%) was delivered in a group setting. Education reduced fatigue compared with usual care by a SMD -0.28, 95% CI [-0.45 to -0.11]. Greater benefits for fatigue were observed when education was delivered one-to-one (SMD -0.44, 95% CI [-0.77 to -0.12]) than in group sessions (SMD -0.17, 95% CI [-0.36 to 0.01]). Mode of delivery (in-person versus telehealth) did not appear to influence the effect of education for fatigue.ConclusionsFatigue education programs may improve fatigue for people with neurological conditions. One-to-one delivered sessions may have greater benefits than group programs and remote delivery could improve accessibility for people living in regional and rural locations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1019-1033"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12290232/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the effect of education on fatigue in adults with neurological conditions? A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Alex Delbridge, Owen Howlett, Coralie English, Dawn B Simpson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692155251351510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveTo determine the effect of education programs on fatigue outcomes in people with neurological conditions.Data sourcesMEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PEDRO until May 2025, according to PRISMA guidelines.Review methodsSystematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing education versus no education/other intervention on the outcome of fatigue for people with neurological conditions. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Pooled effects were calculated using standard mean difference (SMD).ResultsWe included 19 clinical trials of education for fatigue (<i>n</i> = 1970 participants) in five different neurological conditions. Education duration ranged from 4 to 12 weeks, 79% (<i>n</i> = 15) of trials included people with multiple sclerosis and 18% (<i>n</i> = 3) included people with stroke. Most education (11 trials, 58%) was delivered in a group setting. Education reduced fatigue compared with usual care by a SMD -0.28, 95% CI [-0.45 to -0.11]. Greater benefits for fatigue were observed when education was delivered one-to-one (SMD -0.44, 95% CI [-0.77 to -0.12]) than in group sessions (SMD -0.17, 95% CI [-0.36 to 0.01]). Mode of delivery (in-person versus telehealth) did not appear to influence the effect of education for fatigue.ConclusionsFatigue education programs may improve fatigue for people with neurological conditions. One-to-one delivered sessions may have greater benefits than group programs and remote delivery could improve accessibility for people living in regional and rural locations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1019-1033\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12290232/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251351510\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251351510","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨教育方案对神经系统疾病患者疲劳预后的影响。数据来源medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, PEDRO,截止2025年5月,根据PRISMA指南。综述方法对随机对照试验进行系统综述和荟萃分析,比较受教育与未受教育/其他干预对神经系统疾病患者疲劳结果的影响。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估方法学质量和偏倚风险。采用标准平均差(SMD)计算合并效应。结果我们纳入了19项针对5种不同神经系统疾病的疲劳教育临床试验(n = 1970名参与者)。教育时间从4到12周不等,79% (n = 15)的试验包括多发性硬化症患者,18% (n = 3)的试验包括中风患者。大多数教育(11项试验,58%)是在小组环境中进行的。与常规护理相比,教育减少疲劳的SMD为-0.28,95% CI[-0.45至-0.11]。一对一教育(SMD -0.44, 95% CI[-0.77至-0.12])比小组教育(SMD -0.17, 95% CI[-0.36至0.01])对疲劳有更大的益处。提供方式(面对面还是远程保健)似乎并不影响疲劳教育的效果。结论疲劳教育方案可改善神经系统疾病患者的疲劳。一对一授课可能比小组授课有更大的好处,远程授课可以改善生活在地区和农村地区的人们的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What is the effect of education on fatigue in adults with neurological conditions? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

ObjectiveTo determine the effect of education programs on fatigue outcomes in people with neurological conditions.Data sourcesMEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PEDRO until May 2025, according to PRISMA guidelines.Review methodsSystematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing education versus no education/other intervention on the outcome of fatigue for people with neurological conditions. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Pooled effects were calculated using standard mean difference (SMD).ResultsWe included 19 clinical trials of education for fatigue (n = 1970 participants) in five different neurological conditions. Education duration ranged from 4 to 12 weeks, 79% (n = 15) of trials included people with multiple sclerosis and 18% (n = 3) included people with stroke. Most education (11 trials, 58%) was delivered in a group setting. Education reduced fatigue compared with usual care by a SMD -0.28, 95% CI [-0.45 to -0.11]. Greater benefits for fatigue were observed when education was delivered one-to-one (SMD -0.44, 95% CI [-0.77 to -0.12]) than in group sessions (SMD -0.17, 95% CI [-0.36 to 0.01]). Mode of delivery (in-person versus telehealth) did not appear to influence the effect of education for fatigue.ConclusionsFatigue education programs may improve fatigue for people with neurological conditions. One-to-one delivered sessions may have greater benefits than group programs and remote delivery could improve accessibility for people living in regional and rural locations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信