国际泌尿外科病理学会对癌症前驱病变的共识。第一工作组:前列腺。

IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Kenneth A Iczkowski, Angelo M De Marzo, Neeraj Agarwal, David M Berman, Alessia Cimadamore, Samson W Fine, Nancy Greenland, Francesca Khani, Massimo Loda, Tamara L Lotan, Murali Varma, Arul Chinnaiyan, Gianluca Giannarini, Jiaoti Huang, Rodolfo Montironi, George J Netto, Adeboye O Osunkoya, Timothy Ratliff, Glen Kristiansen, Liang Cheng, Geert J L H van Leenders
{"title":"国际泌尿外科病理学会对癌症前驱病变的共识。第一工作组:前列腺。","authors":"Kenneth A Iczkowski, Angelo M De Marzo, Neeraj Agarwal, David M Berman, Alessia Cimadamore, Samson W Fine, Nancy Greenland, Francesca Khani, Massimo Loda, Tamara L Lotan, Murali Varma, Arul Chinnaiyan, Gianluca Giannarini, Jiaoti Huang, Rodolfo Montironi, George J Netto, Adeboye O Osunkoya, Timothy Ratliff, Glen Kristiansen, Liang Cheng, Geert J L H van Leenders","doi":"10.1097/PAS.0000000000002430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Working Group 1 at ISUP's Cancer Precursors meeting (September 2024) evaluated 5 putative precursors of invasive prostate cancer: high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), intraductal carcinoma (IDC), atypical intraductal proliferation (AIP), atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH)/adenosis, and proliferative inflammatory atrophy (PIA). Objectives were to compile recent evidence, interrogate current practices, and vote on recommendations, with 67% approval defined as consensus. Consensus was reached against the reporting of the low-grade form of PIN. HGPIN need not be reported when concomitant cancer or atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for cancer exists adjacent to it, for biopsy or prostatectomy specimens. Finally, while the clinical significance of unifocal HGPIN in biopsies remains uncertain, there is stronger evidence for multifocal isolated HGPIN as a predictor of subsequent cancer detection. By consensus, multifocal HGPIN should continue being reported. Slight refinement was achieved regarding IDC criteria. The consensus opinion was that a dense cribriform to solid proliferation need not demonstrate marked nuclear atypia/ pleomorphism to qualify as IDC. The inverse scenario of marked atypia without dense cribriform/solid proliferation fell just short (65%) of consensus for IDC. Redesignating cribriform HGPIN as AIP achieved consensus. AIP found alone or with grade group 1 cancer warrants an explanatory comment. However, agreement was not attained to report AIP in the presence of invasive cancer, in either needle biopsy or prostatectomy. Finally, the optional reporting of PIA or AAH/adenosis in biopsies as pertinent negatives both fell short of consensus. This guidance should help pathologists standardize reporting, staying focused on the clinically actionable aspects of these lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7772,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Surgical Pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus on Cancer Precursor Lesions. Working Group 1: The Prostate.\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth A Iczkowski, Angelo M De Marzo, Neeraj Agarwal, David M Berman, Alessia Cimadamore, Samson W Fine, Nancy Greenland, Francesca Khani, Massimo Loda, Tamara L Lotan, Murali Varma, Arul Chinnaiyan, Gianluca Giannarini, Jiaoti Huang, Rodolfo Montironi, George J Netto, Adeboye O Osunkoya, Timothy Ratliff, Glen Kristiansen, Liang Cheng, Geert J L H van Leenders\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PAS.0000000000002430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Working Group 1 at ISUP's Cancer Precursors meeting (September 2024) evaluated 5 putative precursors of invasive prostate cancer: high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), intraductal carcinoma (IDC), atypical intraductal proliferation (AIP), atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH)/adenosis, and proliferative inflammatory atrophy (PIA). Objectives were to compile recent evidence, interrogate current practices, and vote on recommendations, with 67% approval defined as consensus. Consensus was reached against the reporting of the low-grade form of PIN. HGPIN need not be reported when concomitant cancer or atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for cancer exists adjacent to it, for biopsy or prostatectomy specimens. Finally, while the clinical significance of unifocal HGPIN in biopsies remains uncertain, there is stronger evidence for multifocal isolated HGPIN as a predictor of subsequent cancer detection. By consensus, multifocal HGPIN should continue being reported. Slight refinement was achieved regarding IDC criteria. The consensus opinion was that a dense cribriform to solid proliferation need not demonstrate marked nuclear atypia/ pleomorphism to qualify as IDC. The inverse scenario of marked atypia without dense cribriform/solid proliferation fell just short (65%) of consensus for IDC. Redesignating cribriform HGPIN as AIP achieved consensus. AIP found alone or with grade group 1 cancer warrants an explanatory comment. However, agreement was not attained to report AIP in the presence of invasive cancer, in either needle biopsy or prostatectomy. Finally, the optional reporting of PIA or AAH/adenosis in biopsies as pertinent negatives both fell short of consensus. This guidance should help pathologists standardize reporting, staying focused on the clinically actionable aspects of these lesions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Surgical Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Surgical Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000002430\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Surgical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000002430","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ISUP癌症前体会议(2024年9月)第一工作组评估了侵袭性前列腺癌的5种推定前体:高级别前列腺上皮内瘤变(HGPIN)、导管内癌(IDC)、非典型导管内增生(AIP)、非典型腺瘤性增生(AAH)/腺病和增长性炎症性萎缩(PIA)。目的是汇编最近的证据,询问当前的做法,并对建议进行投票,67%的赞成被定义为共识。一致反对报告低级形式的PIN。活检或前列腺切除术标本中,当伴发癌或疑似癌的不典型小腺泡增生时,不需要报告HGPIN。最后,虽然活检中单灶HGPIN的临床意义仍不确定,但有更有力的证据表明,多灶分离HGPIN可作为随后癌症检测的预测因子。一致认为,应继续报道多焦点HGPIN。在IDC标准方面略有改进。一致的观点是,致密的筛状到实性增生不需要表现出明显的核异型性/多形性就可以被认为是IDC。相反的情况是明显的非典型性,没有密集的筛网状/固体增生,仅低于IDC的共识(65%)。将cribriform HGPIN重新指定为AIP达成共识。单独发现AIP或合并1级癌症需要解释性评论。然而,在浸润性癌症存在的情况下,无论是在穿刺活检还是前列腺切除术中,AIP的报告都没有达成一致。最后,在活检中选择报告PIA或AAH/腺病作为相关的阴性都没有达成共识。该指南应帮助病理学家标准化报告,保持专注于这些病变的临床可操作方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus on Cancer Precursor Lesions. Working Group 1: The Prostate.

Working Group 1 at ISUP's Cancer Precursors meeting (September 2024) evaluated 5 putative precursors of invasive prostate cancer: high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), intraductal carcinoma (IDC), atypical intraductal proliferation (AIP), atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH)/adenosis, and proliferative inflammatory atrophy (PIA). Objectives were to compile recent evidence, interrogate current practices, and vote on recommendations, with 67% approval defined as consensus. Consensus was reached against the reporting of the low-grade form of PIN. HGPIN need not be reported when concomitant cancer or atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for cancer exists adjacent to it, for biopsy or prostatectomy specimens. Finally, while the clinical significance of unifocal HGPIN in biopsies remains uncertain, there is stronger evidence for multifocal isolated HGPIN as a predictor of subsequent cancer detection. By consensus, multifocal HGPIN should continue being reported. Slight refinement was achieved regarding IDC criteria. The consensus opinion was that a dense cribriform to solid proliferation need not demonstrate marked nuclear atypia/ pleomorphism to qualify as IDC. The inverse scenario of marked atypia without dense cribriform/solid proliferation fell just short (65%) of consensus for IDC. Redesignating cribriform HGPIN as AIP achieved consensus. AIP found alone or with grade group 1 cancer warrants an explanatory comment. However, agreement was not attained to report AIP in the presence of invasive cancer, in either needle biopsy or prostatectomy. Finally, the optional reporting of PIA or AAH/adenosis in biopsies as pertinent negatives both fell short of consensus. This guidance should help pathologists standardize reporting, staying focused on the clinically actionable aspects of these lesions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgical Pathology has achieved worldwide recognition for its outstanding coverage of the state of the art in human surgical pathology. In each monthly issue, experts present original articles, review articles, detailed case reports, and special features, enhanced by superb illustrations. Coverage encompasses technical methods, diagnostic aids, and frozen-section diagnosis, in addition to detailed pathologic studies of a wide range of disease entities. Official Journal of The Arthur Purdy Stout Society of Surgical Pathologists and The Gastrointestinal Pathology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信