针对接受同种异体造血干细胞移植的儿童和成人,基于模型的Busulfan精确剂量:对当前PK模型和剂量建议的关键评估。

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Rashudy F. Mahomedradja, Tim Bognàr, Kaj E. van Schie, Ilse T. Kuipers, Moniek A. de Witte, Jurgen H.E. Kuball, Erfan Nur, Bram J. Wilhelm, Marise R. Heerma van Voss, Linda Franken, Arief Lalmohamed, Eleonora (Noortje) L. Swart, Dave C. de Leeuw, Imke H. Bartelink
{"title":"针对接受同种异体造血干细胞移植的儿童和成人,基于模型的Busulfan精确剂量:对当前PK模型和剂量建议的关键评估。","authors":"Rashudy F. Mahomedradja,&nbsp;Tim Bognàr,&nbsp;Kaj E. van Schie,&nbsp;Ilse T. Kuipers,&nbsp;Moniek A. de Witte,&nbsp;Jurgen H.E. Kuball,&nbsp;Erfan Nur,&nbsp;Bram J. Wilhelm,&nbsp;Marise R. Heerma van Voss,&nbsp;Linda Franken,&nbsp;Arief Lalmohamed,&nbsp;Eleonora (Noortje) L. Swart,&nbsp;Dave C. de Leeuw,&nbsp;Imke H. Bartelink","doi":"10.1002/cpt.3748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Busulfan is administered intravenously in conditioning regimens prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), with model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) targeting a 4-day cumulative AUC of 80–100 mg*hour/L. Three pharmacokinetic (PK) models—Bognar, Langenhorst, and McCune—were evaluated using data with a minimum of 1 and a median of 2 PK sampling days from pediatric and adult patients at two tertiary hospitals in the Netherlands. Simulations with the best-performing model evaluated dose optimization and the role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The Bognar and Langenhorst models, with overlapping datasets (25% between models, 21% with the current), accurately described busulfan concentration-time curves in all 535 patients (0.18–72 years), especially in those &gt; 60 years (bias and precision in clearance; −5.6%, 6.48% and 16.55%, 16.95%; in observed concentrations −1.86%, −6.52% and 9.12%, 3.58% for both models &gt; 60 years). The McCune model underestimated clearance by 36% in children &lt; 2 years of age. Despite accounting for age-dependent glutathione depletion, the Langenhorst model did not outperform the simpler Bognar model. Model-based initial dosing did not improve target attainment over SmPC-based dosing. However, TDM-based MIPD with a single TDM on days 2–4 significantly improved target attainment (49% vs. 87%), with a number needed to treat for TDM of 2.5. This study demonstrates the clinical efficacy of simple PK models such as the Bognar model, providing that simplicity does not compromise performance. It highlights the inadequacy of nomogram-based dosing alone and reinforces the critical role of TDM in optimizing busulfan exposure for pediatric and adult myeloablative HSCT patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"118 3","pages":"723-734"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpt.3748","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Busulfan for Children and Adults Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Critical Evaluation of Current PK Models and Dose Recommendations\",\"authors\":\"Rashudy F. Mahomedradja,&nbsp;Tim Bognàr,&nbsp;Kaj E. van Schie,&nbsp;Ilse T. Kuipers,&nbsp;Moniek A. de Witte,&nbsp;Jurgen H.E. Kuball,&nbsp;Erfan Nur,&nbsp;Bram J. Wilhelm,&nbsp;Marise R. Heerma van Voss,&nbsp;Linda Franken,&nbsp;Arief Lalmohamed,&nbsp;Eleonora (Noortje) L. Swart,&nbsp;Dave C. de Leeuw,&nbsp;Imke H. Bartelink\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpt.3748\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Busulfan is administered intravenously in conditioning regimens prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), with model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) targeting a 4-day cumulative AUC of 80–100 mg*hour/L. Three pharmacokinetic (PK) models—Bognar, Langenhorst, and McCune—were evaluated using data with a minimum of 1 and a median of 2 PK sampling days from pediatric and adult patients at two tertiary hospitals in the Netherlands. Simulations with the best-performing model evaluated dose optimization and the role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The Bognar and Langenhorst models, with overlapping datasets (25% between models, 21% with the current), accurately described busulfan concentration-time curves in all 535 patients (0.18–72 years), especially in those &gt; 60 years (bias and precision in clearance; −5.6%, 6.48% and 16.55%, 16.95%; in observed concentrations −1.86%, −6.52% and 9.12%, 3.58% for both models &gt; 60 years). The McCune model underestimated clearance by 36% in children &lt; 2 years of age. Despite accounting for age-dependent glutathione depletion, the Langenhorst model did not outperform the simpler Bognar model. Model-based initial dosing did not improve target attainment over SmPC-based dosing. However, TDM-based MIPD with a single TDM on days 2–4 significantly improved target attainment (49% vs. 87%), with a number needed to treat for TDM of 2.5. This study demonstrates the clinical efficacy of simple PK models such as the Bognar model, providing that simplicity does not compromise performance. It highlights the inadequacy of nomogram-based dosing alone and reinforces the critical role of TDM in optimizing busulfan exposure for pediatric and adult myeloablative HSCT patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"118 3\",\"pages\":\"723-734\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpt.3748\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpt.3748\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpt.3748","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Busulfan在同种异体造血干细胞移植(HSCT)前的调节方案中静脉注射,模型信息精确剂量(MIPD)的目标是4天累积AUC为80-100 mg*hour/L。三种药代动力学(PK)模型——bognar、Langenhorst和mccune——使用荷兰两家三级医院的儿科和成人患者的最小1天和中位数2天的PK采样数据进行评估。使用性能最佳的模型进行模拟,评估剂量优化和治疗药物监测(TDM)的作用。Bognar和Langenhorst模型具有重叠的数据集(模型之间25%,当前21%),准确地描述了所有535例患者(0.18-72岁)的布苏凡浓度-时间曲线,特别是那些60 - 60岁的患者(清除的偏差和精度;-5.6%, 6.48%, 16.55%, 16.95%;两种模式的观测浓度分别为-1.86%、-6.52%和9.12%、3.58%(60年)。McCune模型低估了36%的儿童清除率
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Busulfan for Children and Adults Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Critical Evaluation of Current PK Models and Dose Recommendations

Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Busulfan for Children and Adults Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Critical Evaluation of Current PK Models and Dose Recommendations

Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Busulfan for Children and Adults Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Critical Evaluation of Current PK Models and Dose Recommendations

Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Busulfan for Children and Adults Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Critical Evaluation of Current PK Models and Dose Recommendations

Busulfan is administered intravenously in conditioning regimens prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), with model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) targeting a 4-day cumulative AUC of 80–100 mg*hour/L. Three pharmacokinetic (PK) models—Bognar, Langenhorst, and McCune—were evaluated using data with a minimum of 1 and a median of 2 PK sampling days from pediatric and adult patients at two tertiary hospitals in the Netherlands. Simulations with the best-performing model evaluated dose optimization and the role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The Bognar and Langenhorst models, with overlapping datasets (25% between models, 21% with the current), accurately described busulfan concentration-time curves in all 535 patients (0.18–72 years), especially in those > 60 years (bias and precision in clearance; −5.6%, 6.48% and 16.55%, 16.95%; in observed concentrations −1.86%, −6.52% and 9.12%, 3.58% for both models > 60 years). The McCune model underestimated clearance by 36% in children < 2 years of age. Despite accounting for age-dependent glutathione depletion, the Langenhorst model did not outperform the simpler Bognar model. Model-based initial dosing did not improve target attainment over SmPC-based dosing. However, TDM-based MIPD with a single TDM on days 2–4 significantly improved target attainment (49% vs. 87%), with a number needed to treat for TDM of 2.5. This study demonstrates the clinical efficacy of simple PK models such as the Bognar model, providing that simplicity does not compromise performance. It highlights the inadequacy of nomogram-based dosing alone and reinforces the critical role of TDM in optimizing busulfan exposure for pediatric and adult myeloablative HSCT patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信