多基因疾病的植入前基因检测:美国生殖遗传咨询师、生殖内分泌学和不孕症专家的观点

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Saanchi Shah, Rita M. Cantor, Molly Quinn, Jessica Shamshoni, Christina G. S. Palmer
{"title":"多基因疾病的植入前基因检测:美国生殖遗传咨询师、生殖内分泌学和不孕症专家的观点","authors":"Saanchi Shah,&nbsp;Rita M. Cantor,&nbsp;Molly Quinn,&nbsp;Jessica Shamshoni,&nbsp;Christina G. S. Palmer","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.70072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The purpose of this study was to assess awareness of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for polygenic disorders (PGT-P) and viewpoints surrounding PGT among reproductive genetic counselors (GCs) and reproductive endocrinology infertility physicians (REIs) in the United States. GCs and REIs were recruited via professional groups to complete an anonymous online survey that assessed awareness of PGT-P, motivating factors that are considered in recommending PGT-P and views on clinical use of PGT. In our sample of 82 GCs and 54 REIs, 80% reported having heard of PGT-P, 52% answered yes or maybe to whether patients should have the option of PGT-P for polygenic conditions, and only 18% answered yes or maybe to whether they would recommend it to their patients. REI participants (28%) were more likely to endorse recommending PGT-P in the context of in vitro fertilization + PGT for other indications compared to GC participants (12%) (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Advanced egg age and prior pregnancy history were the motivating factors that significantly differed between REI and GC participants in recommending PGT-P. In contrast to PGT-P, most participants (&gt;96%) support patients having the option of PGT for aneuploidy, monogenic disorders of childhood and adult-onset conditions, and structural rearrangements. These findings warrant further research to better understand if GCs and REIs would recommend PGT-P in the future when more refined genetic risk estimates are developed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":"34 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.70072","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic disorders: Viewpoints of reproductive genetic counselors and reproductive endocrinology and infertility specialists in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Saanchi Shah,&nbsp;Rita M. Cantor,&nbsp;Molly Quinn,&nbsp;Jessica Shamshoni,&nbsp;Christina G. S. Palmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgc4.70072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The purpose of this study was to assess awareness of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for polygenic disorders (PGT-P) and viewpoints surrounding PGT among reproductive genetic counselors (GCs) and reproductive endocrinology infertility physicians (REIs) in the United States. GCs and REIs were recruited via professional groups to complete an anonymous online survey that assessed awareness of PGT-P, motivating factors that are considered in recommending PGT-P and views on clinical use of PGT. In our sample of 82 GCs and 54 REIs, 80% reported having heard of PGT-P, 52% answered yes or maybe to whether patients should have the option of PGT-P for polygenic conditions, and only 18% answered yes or maybe to whether they would recommend it to their patients. REI participants (28%) were more likely to endorse recommending PGT-P in the context of in vitro fertilization + PGT for other indications compared to GC participants (12%) (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Advanced egg age and prior pregnancy history were the motivating factors that significantly differed between REI and GC participants in recommending PGT-P. In contrast to PGT-P, most participants (&gt;96%) support patients having the option of PGT for aneuploidy, monogenic disorders of childhood and adult-onset conditions, and structural rearrangements. These findings warrant further research to better understand if GCs and REIs would recommend PGT-P in the future when more refined genetic risk estimates are developed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Genetic Counseling\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.70072\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Genetic Counseling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70072\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估美国生殖遗传咨询师(GCs)和生殖内分泌不育医生(REIs)对多基因疾病(PGT- p)的植入前基因检测(PGT)的认识以及围绕PGT的观点。通过专业小组招募GCs和rei完成一项匿名在线调查,评估PGT- p的认知、推荐PGT- p的激励因素以及对PGT临床应用的看法。在我们82名GCs和54名rei的样本中,80%的人报告听说过PGT-P, 52%的人回答是或可能患者是否应该选择PGT-P治疗多基因疾病,只有18%的人回答是或可能他们是否会推荐给他们的患者。与GC参与者(12%)相比,REI参与者(28%)更有可能在体外受精+ PGT治疗其他适应症的情况下推荐PGT- p (p = 0.02)。在推荐PGT-P方面,REI和GC参与者之间存在显著差异的激励因素是卵子年龄和既往妊娠史。与PGT- p相比,大多数参与者(>96%)支持非整倍体、儿童和成人发病的单基因疾病和结构重排的患者选择PGT。这些发现值得进一步研究,以更好地了解当未来开发出更精确的遗传风险评估时,GCs和rei是否会推荐PGT-P。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic disorders: Viewpoints of reproductive genetic counselors and reproductive endocrinology and infertility specialists in the United States

The purpose of this study was to assess awareness of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for polygenic disorders (PGT-P) and viewpoints surrounding PGT among reproductive genetic counselors (GCs) and reproductive endocrinology infertility physicians (REIs) in the United States. GCs and REIs were recruited via professional groups to complete an anonymous online survey that assessed awareness of PGT-P, motivating factors that are considered in recommending PGT-P and views on clinical use of PGT. In our sample of 82 GCs and 54 REIs, 80% reported having heard of PGT-P, 52% answered yes or maybe to whether patients should have the option of PGT-P for polygenic conditions, and only 18% answered yes or maybe to whether they would recommend it to their patients. REI participants (28%) were more likely to endorse recommending PGT-P in the context of in vitro fertilization + PGT for other indications compared to GC participants (12%) (p = 0.02). Advanced egg age and prior pregnancy history were the motivating factors that significantly differed between REI and GC participants in recommending PGT-P. In contrast to PGT-P, most participants (>96%) support patients having the option of PGT for aneuploidy, monogenic disorders of childhood and adult-onset conditions, and structural rearrangements. These findings warrant further research to better understand if GCs and REIs would recommend PGT-P in the future when more refined genetic risk estimates are developed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信