Saanchi Shah, Rita M. Cantor, Molly Quinn, Jessica Shamshoni, Christina G. S. Palmer
{"title":"多基因疾病的植入前基因检测:美国生殖遗传咨询师、生殖内分泌学和不孕症专家的观点","authors":"Saanchi Shah, Rita M. Cantor, Molly Quinn, Jessica Shamshoni, Christina G. S. Palmer","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.70072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The purpose of this study was to assess awareness of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for polygenic disorders (PGT-P) and viewpoints surrounding PGT among reproductive genetic counselors (GCs) and reproductive endocrinology infertility physicians (REIs) in the United States. GCs and REIs were recruited via professional groups to complete an anonymous online survey that assessed awareness of PGT-P, motivating factors that are considered in recommending PGT-P and views on clinical use of PGT. In our sample of 82 GCs and 54 REIs, 80% reported having heard of PGT-P, 52% answered yes or maybe to whether patients should have the option of PGT-P for polygenic conditions, and only 18% answered yes or maybe to whether they would recommend it to their patients. REI participants (28%) were more likely to endorse recommending PGT-P in the context of in vitro fertilization + PGT for other indications compared to GC participants (12%) (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Advanced egg age and prior pregnancy history were the motivating factors that significantly differed between REI and GC participants in recommending PGT-P. In contrast to PGT-P, most participants (>96%) support patients having the option of PGT for aneuploidy, monogenic disorders of childhood and adult-onset conditions, and structural rearrangements. These findings warrant further research to better understand if GCs and REIs would recommend PGT-P in the future when more refined genetic risk estimates are developed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":"34 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.70072","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic disorders: Viewpoints of reproductive genetic counselors and reproductive endocrinology and infertility specialists in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Saanchi Shah, Rita M. Cantor, Molly Quinn, Jessica Shamshoni, Christina G. S. Palmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgc4.70072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The purpose of this study was to assess awareness of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for polygenic disorders (PGT-P) and viewpoints surrounding PGT among reproductive genetic counselors (GCs) and reproductive endocrinology infertility physicians (REIs) in the United States. GCs and REIs were recruited via professional groups to complete an anonymous online survey that assessed awareness of PGT-P, motivating factors that are considered in recommending PGT-P and views on clinical use of PGT. In our sample of 82 GCs and 54 REIs, 80% reported having heard of PGT-P, 52% answered yes or maybe to whether patients should have the option of PGT-P for polygenic conditions, and only 18% answered yes or maybe to whether they would recommend it to their patients. REI participants (28%) were more likely to endorse recommending PGT-P in the context of in vitro fertilization + PGT for other indications compared to GC participants (12%) (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Advanced egg age and prior pregnancy history were the motivating factors that significantly differed between REI and GC participants in recommending PGT-P. In contrast to PGT-P, most participants (>96%) support patients having the option of PGT for aneuploidy, monogenic disorders of childhood and adult-onset conditions, and structural rearrangements. These findings warrant further research to better understand if GCs and REIs would recommend PGT-P in the future when more refined genetic risk estimates are developed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Genetic Counseling\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.70072\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Genetic Counseling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70072\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic disorders: Viewpoints of reproductive genetic counselors and reproductive endocrinology and infertility specialists in the United States
The purpose of this study was to assess awareness of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for polygenic disorders (PGT-P) and viewpoints surrounding PGT among reproductive genetic counselors (GCs) and reproductive endocrinology infertility physicians (REIs) in the United States. GCs and REIs were recruited via professional groups to complete an anonymous online survey that assessed awareness of PGT-P, motivating factors that are considered in recommending PGT-P and views on clinical use of PGT. In our sample of 82 GCs and 54 REIs, 80% reported having heard of PGT-P, 52% answered yes or maybe to whether patients should have the option of PGT-P for polygenic conditions, and only 18% answered yes or maybe to whether they would recommend it to their patients. REI participants (28%) were more likely to endorse recommending PGT-P in the context of in vitro fertilization + PGT for other indications compared to GC participants (12%) (p = 0.02). Advanced egg age and prior pregnancy history were the motivating factors that significantly differed between REI and GC participants in recommending PGT-P. In contrast to PGT-P, most participants (>96%) support patients having the option of PGT for aneuploidy, monogenic disorders of childhood and adult-onset conditions, and structural rearrangements. These findings warrant further research to better understand if GCs and REIs would recommend PGT-P in the future when more refined genetic risk estimates are developed.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.