{"title":"欧盟关于关键基础设施保护的立法在波罗的海地区的法律实施绩效","authors":"Marie Becker","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcip.2025.100781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Both, in the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine and in the proliferation of hybrid attacks on EU territory, critical energy infrastructure has become a primary target. One EU- response to the ensuing need for transnational action consists in the CER-Directive of 2022 on the resilience of critical entities. Its effectiveness now hinges on national implementation, currently pervaded by delay despite the undisputable urgency. To begin to shed some light, this study analyses legal implementation of the directive’s predecessor (ECI-Directive of 2008) to assess explanatory approaches from the discipline of implementation studies in the particular field of critical infrastructure protection. Focusing on the hotspot Baltic Sea Region, it shows how country-specific generalized expectations do not hold and how fundamental misfit between pre-existing national frameworks and a directive can instead help predict deviation. For the ECI-Directive, the study shows significant delays and deviation for individual countries, as well as only limited harmonization across the region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49057,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 100781"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transposing EU-legislation on critical infrastructure protection legal implementation performance in the Baltic Sea region\",\"authors\":\"Marie Becker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijcip.2025.100781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Both, in the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine and in the proliferation of hybrid attacks on EU territory, critical energy infrastructure has become a primary target. One EU- response to the ensuing need for transnational action consists in the CER-Directive of 2022 on the resilience of critical entities. Its effectiveness now hinges on national implementation, currently pervaded by delay despite the undisputable urgency. To begin to shed some light, this study analyses legal implementation of the directive’s predecessor (ECI-Directive of 2008) to assess explanatory approaches from the discipline of implementation studies in the particular field of critical infrastructure protection. Focusing on the hotspot Baltic Sea Region, it shows how country-specific generalized expectations do not hold and how fundamental misfit between pre-existing national frameworks and a directive can instead help predict deviation. For the ECI-Directive, the study shows significant delays and deviation for individual countries, as well as only limited harmonization across the region.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection\",\"volume\":\"50 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100781\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874548225000423\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874548225000423","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Transposing EU-legislation on critical infrastructure protection legal implementation performance in the Baltic Sea region
Both, in the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine and in the proliferation of hybrid attacks on EU territory, critical energy infrastructure has become a primary target. One EU- response to the ensuing need for transnational action consists in the CER-Directive of 2022 on the resilience of critical entities. Its effectiveness now hinges on national implementation, currently pervaded by delay despite the undisputable urgency. To begin to shed some light, this study analyses legal implementation of the directive’s predecessor (ECI-Directive of 2008) to assess explanatory approaches from the discipline of implementation studies in the particular field of critical infrastructure protection. Focusing on the hotspot Baltic Sea Region, it shows how country-specific generalized expectations do not hold and how fundamental misfit between pre-existing national frameworks and a directive can instead help predict deviation. For the ECI-Directive, the study shows significant delays and deviation for individual countries, as well as only limited harmonization across the region.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection (IJCIP) was launched in 2008, with the primary aim of publishing scholarly papers of the highest quality in all areas of critical infrastructure protection. Of particular interest are articles that weave science, technology, law and policy to craft sophisticated yet practical solutions for securing assets in the various critical infrastructure sectors. These critical infrastructure sectors include: information technology, telecommunications, energy, banking and finance, transportation systems, chemicals, critical manufacturing, agriculture and food, defense industrial base, public health and health care, national monuments and icons, drinking water and water treatment systems, commercial facilities, dams, emergency services, nuclear reactors, materials and waste, postal and shipping, and government facilities. Protecting and ensuring the continuity of operation of critical infrastructure assets are vital to national security, public health and safety, economic vitality, and societal wellbeing.
The scope of the journal includes, but is not limited to:
1. Analysis of security challenges that are unique or common to the various infrastructure sectors.
2. Identification of core security principles and techniques that can be applied to critical infrastructure protection.
3. Elucidation of the dependencies and interdependencies existing between infrastructure sectors and techniques for mitigating the devastating effects of cascading failures.
4. Creation of sophisticated, yet practical, solutions, for critical infrastructure protection that involve mathematical, scientific and engineering techniques, economic and social science methods, and/or legal and public policy constructs.