高频射流通风的安全性和有效性:一个系统的和叙述性的回顾

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Jasmin Spaar , Peter Biro , Michael Sander , Volker Gross , Michael Scholtes , Keywan Sohrabi
{"title":"高频射流通风的安全性和有效性:一个系统的和叙述性的回顾","authors":"Jasmin Spaar ,&nbsp;Peter Biro ,&nbsp;Michael Sander ,&nbsp;Volker Gross ,&nbsp;Michael Scholtes ,&nbsp;Keywan Sohrabi","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>High-Frequency Jet Ventilation (HFJV) is a specific modality of mechanical ventilation employed in certain operative and critical care settings. Despite its technical advantages, particularly in procedures requiring minimal organ motion, HFJV remains underutilised in routine clinical practice, largely due to limited high-quality evidence and the absence of formal national guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This systematic review aims to critically appraise the current evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of HFJV in adult and paediatric patients. The analysis covers both operating room and intensive care unit settings, and compares HFJV with conventional ventilation strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We included 41 studies published after 1997, which were appraised using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) levels of evidence and Cochrane risk-of-bias tools (RoB 2 and ROBINS-I).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most studies demonstrated favourable physiological and procedural outcomes with HFJV in intraoperative settings, The benefits were most notable during airway surgeries, tissue ablation procedures, and atrial fibrillation ablation.. In contrast, results in neonatal intensive care were heterogeneous, with some studies reporting improved gas exchange, while others indicated higher complication or mortality rates. Common limitations included small sample sizes, methodological heterogeneity, and risk of selection and publication bias. Volatile anaesthetic delivery was universally unfeasible, and HFJV performance was reduced in obese or COPD patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This review underscores the need for further research to optimise HFJV application and to better understand its long-term clinical impacts. The insights gained provide valuable guidance for future clinical use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 111906"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of high frequency jet ventilation: A systematic and narrative review\",\"authors\":\"Jasmin Spaar ,&nbsp;Peter Biro ,&nbsp;Michael Sander ,&nbsp;Volker Gross ,&nbsp;Michael Scholtes ,&nbsp;Keywan Sohrabi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111906\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>High-Frequency Jet Ventilation (HFJV) is a specific modality of mechanical ventilation employed in certain operative and critical care settings. Despite its technical advantages, particularly in procedures requiring minimal organ motion, HFJV remains underutilised in routine clinical practice, largely due to limited high-quality evidence and the absence of formal national guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This systematic review aims to critically appraise the current evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of HFJV in adult and paediatric patients. The analysis covers both operating room and intensive care unit settings, and compares HFJV with conventional ventilation strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We included 41 studies published after 1997, which were appraised using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) levels of evidence and Cochrane risk-of-bias tools (RoB 2 and ROBINS-I).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most studies demonstrated favourable physiological and procedural outcomes with HFJV in intraoperative settings, The benefits were most notable during airway surgeries, tissue ablation procedures, and atrial fibrillation ablation.. In contrast, results in neonatal intensive care were heterogeneous, with some studies reporting improved gas exchange, while others indicated higher complication or mortality rates. Common limitations included small sample sizes, methodological heterogeneity, and risk of selection and publication bias. Volatile anaesthetic delivery was universally unfeasible, and HFJV performance was reduced in obese or COPD patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This review underscores the need for further research to optimise HFJV application and to better understand its long-term clinical impacts. The insights gained provide valuable guidance for future clinical use.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"106 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111906\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818025001679\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818025001679","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高频喷射通气(HFJV)是一种特殊的机械通气方式,用于某些手术和危重监护环境。尽管HFJV具有技术优势,特别是在需要最小器官运动的手术中,但在常规临床实践中仍未得到充分利用,这主要是由于高质量证据有限和缺乏正式的国家指南。目的:本系统综述旨在批判性地评价目前关于HFJV在成人和儿科患者中的安全性和有效性的证据。该分析涵盖手术室和重症监护病房设置,并将HFJV与传统通气策略进行比较。方法按照PRISMA指南进行全面的文献检索。我们纳入了1997年以后发表的41项研究,使用牛津循证医学中心(OCEBM)的证据水平和Cochrane偏倚风险工具(RoB 2和ROBINS-I)对这些研究进行了评价。结果大多数研究表明HFJV在术中具有良好的生理和手术效果,在气道手术、组织消融和房颤消融过程中效果最为显著。相比之下,新生儿重症监护的结果是不一致的,一些研究报告改善了气体交换,而另一些研究表明更高的并发症或死亡率。常见的限制包括样本量小、方法异质性、选择和发表偏倚风险。挥发性麻醉递送普遍不可行,并且HFJV在肥胖或COPD患者中的表现降低。结论本综述强调需要进一步研究以优化HFJV的应用,并更好地了解其长期临床影响。所获得的见解为今后的临床应用提供了有价值的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and efficacy of high frequency jet ventilation: A systematic and narrative review

Background

High-Frequency Jet Ventilation (HFJV) is a specific modality of mechanical ventilation employed in certain operative and critical care settings. Despite its technical advantages, particularly in procedures requiring minimal organ motion, HFJV remains underutilised in routine clinical practice, largely due to limited high-quality evidence and the absence of formal national guidelines.

Objective

This systematic review aims to critically appraise the current evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of HFJV in adult and paediatric patients. The analysis covers both operating room and intensive care unit settings, and compares HFJV with conventional ventilation strategies.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We included 41 studies published after 1997, which were appraised using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) levels of evidence and Cochrane risk-of-bias tools (RoB 2 and ROBINS-I).

Results

Most studies demonstrated favourable physiological and procedural outcomes with HFJV in intraoperative settings, The benefits were most notable during airway surgeries, tissue ablation procedures, and atrial fibrillation ablation.. In contrast, results in neonatal intensive care were heterogeneous, with some studies reporting improved gas exchange, while others indicated higher complication or mortality rates. Common limitations included small sample sizes, methodological heterogeneity, and risk of selection and publication bias. Volatile anaesthetic delivery was universally unfeasible, and HFJV performance was reduced in obese or COPD patients.

Conclusions

This review underscores the need for further research to optimise HFJV application and to better understand its long-term clinical impacts. The insights gained provide valuable guidance for future clinical use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained. The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信