{"title":"支持项目:通过手术室新生儿复苏支持父母和专业人员。阶段1和阶段2:对当前实践的定性综合和捕获","authors":"E. Godfrey , T. Kitchen , N. Harris , S. Channon","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The anaesthetic team routinely act as the initial information providers to mothers and birth partners during neonatal resuscitation in obstetric theatre. This situation presents unique, under-researched communication challenges. Through exploration of parental and professional voices, we aimed to describe the determinates of high-quality communication during this time.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a two-phase, mixed-method study. In phase 1, a scoping exercise involved parents with personal experience of neonatal resuscitation in theatre; In phase 2, an anaesthetic staff questionnaire explored professional experiences and communication during neonatal resuscitation in theatre across all Welsh National Health Service (NHS) hospitals with secondary obstetric services.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The qualitative framework analysis revealed overlapping themes from 112 parent responses (phase 1) and 175 anaesthetic staff responses (phase 2). In phase 1, parents reported positive experiences reflecting their desire for clear, honest, timely information delivered compassionately, alongside the use of photos and videos. Challenging experiences highlighted a perceived lack of information, insensitive, impersonal communication and processes, the use of jargon and a challenging environment. In phase 2, the staff demonstrated high exposure to, and negative emotional impact from neonatal resuscitation experiences. Communication barriers included restricted situational insight, emotional stress alongside complex care delivery. Strategies to assist communication included actively seeking information, providing a compassionate approach, offering assurances and managing the environment. Training in communication during neonatal resuscitation was reported by 4% (7/175) of staff.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this mixed-model qualitative study, we identified that mothers and birth partners desired clear, honest updates delivered with compassion. Assurances of high-quality care provision for their baby alongside avoidance of false reassurance were important. Anaesthetic staff recognised their role in providing this information but reported lacking confidence to do so and would welcome training. The reported results can be used to inform the development of evidenced-based tools and training.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 104702"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The SuPPORT project: Supporting Parents and Professionals through NeOnatal resuscitation in theatre. Phases 1 and 2: qualitative synthesis and capture of current practice\",\"authors\":\"E. Godfrey , T. Kitchen , N. Harris , S. Channon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The anaesthetic team routinely act as the initial information providers to mothers and birth partners during neonatal resuscitation in obstetric theatre. This situation presents unique, under-researched communication challenges. Through exploration of parental and professional voices, we aimed to describe the determinates of high-quality communication during this time.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a two-phase, mixed-method study. In phase 1, a scoping exercise involved parents with personal experience of neonatal resuscitation in theatre; In phase 2, an anaesthetic staff questionnaire explored professional experiences and communication during neonatal resuscitation in theatre across all Welsh National Health Service (NHS) hospitals with secondary obstetric services.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The qualitative framework analysis revealed overlapping themes from 112 parent responses (phase 1) and 175 anaesthetic staff responses (phase 2). In phase 1, parents reported positive experiences reflecting their desire for clear, honest, timely information delivered compassionately, alongside the use of photos and videos. Challenging experiences highlighted a perceived lack of information, insensitive, impersonal communication and processes, the use of jargon and a challenging environment. In phase 2, the staff demonstrated high exposure to, and negative emotional impact from neonatal resuscitation experiences. Communication barriers included restricted situational insight, emotional stress alongside complex care delivery. Strategies to assist communication included actively seeking information, providing a compassionate approach, offering assurances and managing the environment. Training in communication during neonatal resuscitation was reported by 4% (7/175) of staff.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this mixed-model qualitative study, we identified that mothers and birth partners desired clear, honest updates delivered with compassion. Assurances of high-quality care provision for their baby alongside avoidance of false reassurance were important. Anaesthetic staff recognised their role in providing this information but reported lacking confidence to do so and would welcome training. The reported results can be used to inform the development of evidenced-based tools and training.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of obstetric anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"63 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104702\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of obstetric anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X25002948\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X25002948","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The SuPPORT project: Supporting Parents and Professionals through NeOnatal resuscitation in theatre. Phases 1 and 2: qualitative synthesis and capture of current practice
Background
The anaesthetic team routinely act as the initial information providers to mothers and birth partners during neonatal resuscitation in obstetric theatre. This situation presents unique, under-researched communication challenges. Through exploration of parental and professional voices, we aimed to describe the determinates of high-quality communication during this time.
Methods
This was a two-phase, mixed-method study. In phase 1, a scoping exercise involved parents with personal experience of neonatal resuscitation in theatre; In phase 2, an anaesthetic staff questionnaire explored professional experiences and communication during neonatal resuscitation in theatre across all Welsh National Health Service (NHS) hospitals with secondary obstetric services.
Results
The qualitative framework analysis revealed overlapping themes from 112 parent responses (phase 1) and 175 anaesthetic staff responses (phase 2). In phase 1, parents reported positive experiences reflecting their desire for clear, honest, timely information delivered compassionately, alongside the use of photos and videos. Challenging experiences highlighted a perceived lack of information, insensitive, impersonal communication and processes, the use of jargon and a challenging environment. In phase 2, the staff demonstrated high exposure to, and negative emotional impact from neonatal resuscitation experiences. Communication barriers included restricted situational insight, emotional stress alongside complex care delivery. Strategies to assist communication included actively seeking information, providing a compassionate approach, offering assurances and managing the environment. Training in communication during neonatal resuscitation was reported by 4% (7/175) of staff.
Conclusion
In this mixed-model qualitative study, we identified that mothers and birth partners desired clear, honest updates delivered with compassion. Assurances of high-quality care provision for their baby alongside avoidance of false reassurance were important. Anaesthetic staff recognised their role in providing this information but reported lacking confidence to do so and would welcome training. The reported results can be used to inform the development of evidenced-based tools and training.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient.
• Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered.
• The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia.
• Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome.
The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.