支持项目:通过手术室新生儿复苏支持父母和专业人员。阶段1和阶段2:对当前实践的定性综合和捕获

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
E. Godfrey , T. Kitchen , N. Harris , S. Channon
{"title":"支持项目:通过手术室新生儿复苏支持父母和专业人员。阶段1和阶段2:对当前实践的定性综合和捕获","authors":"E. Godfrey ,&nbsp;T. Kitchen ,&nbsp;N. Harris ,&nbsp;S. Channon","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The anaesthetic team routinely act as the initial information providers to mothers and birth partners during neonatal resuscitation in obstetric theatre. This situation presents unique, under-researched communication challenges. Through exploration of parental and professional voices, we aimed to describe the determinates of high-quality communication during this time.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a two-phase, mixed-method study. In phase 1, a scoping exercise involved parents with personal experience of neonatal resuscitation in theatre; In phase 2, an anaesthetic staff questionnaire explored professional experiences and communication during neonatal resuscitation in theatre across all Welsh National Health Service (NHS) hospitals with secondary obstetric services.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The qualitative framework analysis revealed overlapping themes from 112 parent responses (phase 1) and 175 anaesthetic staff responses (phase 2). In phase 1, parents reported positive experiences reflecting their desire for clear, honest, timely information delivered compassionately, alongside the use of photos and videos. Challenging experiences highlighted a perceived lack of information, insensitive, impersonal communication and processes, the use of jargon and a challenging environment. In phase 2, the staff demonstrated high exposure to, and negative emotional impact from neonatal resuscitation experiences. Communication barriers included restricted situational insight, emotional stress alongside complex care delivery. Strategies to assist communication included actively seeking information, providing a compassionate approach, offering assurances and managing the environment. Training in communication during neonatal resuscitation was reported by 4% (7/175) of staff.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this mixed-model qualitative study, we identified that mothers and birth partners desired clear, honest updates delivered with compassion. Assurances of high-quality care provision for their baby alongside avoidance of false reassurance were important. Anaesthetic staff recognised their role in providing this information but reported lacking confidence to do so and would welcome training. The reported results can be used to inform the development of evidenced-based tools and training.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 104702"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The SuPPORT project: Supporting Parents and Professionals through NeOnatal resuscitation in theatre. Phases 1 and 2: qualitative synthesis and capture of current practice\",\"authors\":\"E. Godfrey ,&nbsp;T. Kitchen ,&nbsp;N. Harris ,&nbsp;S. Channon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The anaesthetic team routinely act as the initial information providers to mothers and birth partners during neonatal resuscitation in obstetric theatre. This situation presents unique, under-researched communication challenges. Through exploration of parental and professional voices, we aimed to describe the determinates of high-quality communication during this time.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a two-phase, mixed-method study. In phase 1, a scoping exercise involved parents with personal experience of neonatal resuscitation in theatre; In phase 2, an anaesthetic staff questionnaire explored professional experiences and communication during neonatal resuscitation in theatre across all Welsh National Health Service (NHS) hospitals with secondary obstetric services.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The qualitative framework analysis revealed overlapping themes from 112 parent responses (phase 1) and 175 anaesthetic staff responses (phase 2). In phase 1, parents reported positive experiences reflecting their desire for clear, honest, timely information delivered compassionately, alongside the use of photos and videos. Challenging experiences highlighted a perceived lack of information, insensitive, impersonal communication and processes, the use of jargon and a challenging environment. In phase 2, the staff demonstrated high exposure to, and negative emotional impact from neonatal resuscitation experiences. Communication barriers included restricted situational insight, emotional stress alongside complex care delivery. Strategies to assist communication included actively seeking information, providing a compassionate approach, offering assurances and managing the environment. Training in communication during neonatal resuscitation was reported by 4% (7/175) of staff.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this mixed-model qualitative study, we identified that mothers and birth partners desired clear, honest updates delivered with compassion. Assurances of high-quality care provision for their baby alongside avoidance of false reassurance were important. Anaesthetic staff recognised their role in providing this information but reported lacking confidence to do so and would welcome training. The reported results can be used to inform the development of evidenced-based tools and training.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of obstetric anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"63 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104702\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of obstetric anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X25002948\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X25002948","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在产科医院新生儿复苏期间,麻醉团队通常是母亲和分娩伙伴的初始信息提供者。这种情况提出了独特的、尚未得到充分研究的沟通挑战。通过对父母和专业人士声音的探索,我们旨在描述这段时间内高质量沟通的决定因素。方法采用两期混合方法进行研究。在第一阶段,一个范围界定练习涉及父母的个人经验的新生儿复苏在手术室;在第二阶段,麻醉师工作人员问卷调查了所有威尔士国家卫生服务(NHS)二级产科医院在手术室新生儿复苏期间的专业经验和沟通。结果定性框架分析发现,112个家长回答(第一阶段)和175个麻醉人员回答(第二阶段)的主题重叠。在第一阶段,家长们报告了积极的体验,反映了他们对清晰、诚实、及时的信息的渴望,以及对照片和视频的使用。具有挑战性的经历突出了信息的缺乏、不敏感、非个人的沟通和流程、使用术语和具有挑战性的环境。在第2阶段,工作人员表现出对新生儿复苏经历的高度暴露和负面情绪影响。沟通障碍包括有限的情景洞察力、情绪压力和复杂的护理交付。协助沟通的战略包括积极寻找信息、提供富有同情心的办法、提供保证和管理环境。4%(7/175)的工作人员报告了新生儿复苏期间的沟通培训。结论:在这个混合模型定性研究中,我们发现母亲和生育伴侣希望以同情的方式提供清晰、诚实的信息。保证为他们的婴儿提供高质量的护理,同时避免虚假的保证是重要的。麻醉人员认识到他们在提供这些信息方面的作用,但报告说他们缺乏信心,并欢迎培训。报告的结果可用于为开发循证工具和培训提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The SuPPORT project: Supporting Parents and Professionals through NeOnatal resuscitation in theatre. Phases 1 and 2: qualitative synthesis and capture of current practice

Background

The anaesthetic team routinely act as the initial information providers to mothers and birth partners during neonatal resuscitation in obstetric theatre. This situation presents unique, under-researched communication challenges. Through exploration of parental and professional voices, we aimed to describe the determinates of high-quality communication during this time.

Methods

This was a two-phase, mixed-method study. In phase 1, a scoping exercise involved parents with personal experience of neonatal resuscitation in theatre; In phase 2, an anaesthetic staff questionnaire explored professional experiences and communication during neonatal resuscitation in theatre across all Welsh National Health Service (NHS) hospitals with secondary obstetric services.

Results

The qualitative framework analysis revealed overlapping themes from 112 parent responses (phase 1) and 175 anaesthetic staff responses (phase 2). In phase 1, parents reported positive experiences reflecting their desire for clear, honest, timely information delivered compassionately, alongside the use of photos and videos. Challenging experiences highlighted a perceived lack of information, insensitive, impersonal communication and processes, the use of jargon and a challenging environment. In phase 2, the staff demonstrated high exposure to, and negative emotional impact from neonatal resuscitation experiences. Communication barriers included restricted situational insight, emotional stress alongside complex care delivery. Strategies to assist communication included actively seeking information, providing a compassionate approach, offering assurances and managing the environment. Training in communication during neonatal resuscitation was reported by 4% (7/175) of staff.

Conclusion

In this mixed-model qualitative study, we identified that mothers and birth partners desired clear, honest updates delivered with compassion. Assurances of high-quality care provision for their baby alongside avoidance of false reassurance were important. Anaesthetic staff recognised their role in providing this information but reported lacking confidence to do so and would welcome training. The reported results can be used to inform the development of evidenced-based tools and training.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient. • Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered. • The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia. • Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome. The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信