Paul-Henry Mackeprang , Jenny Bertholet , Claas Wessels , Jean-Benoit Rossel , Andreas Limacher , Daniel M. Aebersold , Michael K. Fix , Peter Manser
{"title":"健康志愿者在动态轨迹放疗中对工作台旋转耐受的随机安全性研究","authors":"Paul-Henry Mackeprang , Jenny Bertholet , Claas Wessels , Jean-Benoit Rossel , Andreas Limacher , Daniel M. Aebersold , Michael K. Fix , Peter Manser","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2025.100796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to show that table movement of dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) does not induce more motion sickness than standard-of-care non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (ncVMAT). Forty-one healthy volunteers underwent dry-runs of DTRT and ncVMAT in four different, randomly allocated sequences. The primary outcome was the Motion Sickness Assessment Questionnaire (MSAQ) summary score. The average change in MSAQ summary score before to after dry-runs was 1.88 for DTRT and 1.62 for ncVMAT. The difference between both techniques was 0.26 [95% CI: −0.24 to 0.75]; the CI demonstrated non-inferiority of DTRT to ncVMAT for motion sickness in healthy volunteers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100796"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A randomized safety study of tolerance to table rotation in dynamic trajectory radiotherapy in healthy volunteers\",\"authors\":\"Paul-Henry Mackeprang , Jenny Bertholet , Claas Wessels , Jean-Benoit Rossel , Andreas Limacher , Daniel M. Aebersold , Michael K. Fix , Peter Manser\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.phro.2025.100796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study aimed to show that table movement of dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) does not induce more motion sickness than standard-of-care non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (ncVMAT). Forty-one healthy volunteers underwent dry-runs of DTRT and ncVMAT in four different, randomly allocated sequences. The primary outcome was the Motion Sickness Assessment Questionnaire (MSAQ) summary score. The average change in MSAQ summary score before to after dry-runs was 1.88 for DTRT and 1.62 for ncVMAT. The difference between both techniques was 0.26 [95% CI: −0.24 to 0.75]; the CI demonstrated non-inferiority of DTRT to ncVMAT for motion sickness in healthy volunteers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100796\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631625001010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631625001010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A randomized safety study of tolerance to table rotation in dynamic trajectory radiotherapy in healthy volunteers
This study aimed to show that table movement of dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) does not induce more motion sickness than standard-of-care non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (ncVMAT). Forty-one healthy volunteers underwent dry-runs of DTRT and ncVMAT in four different, randomly allocated sequences. The primary outcome was the Motion Sickness Assessment Questionnaire (MSAQ) summary score. The average change in MSAQ summary score before to after dry-runs was 1.88 for DTRT and 1.62 for ncVMAT. The difference between both techniques was 0.26 [95% CI: −0.24 to 0.75]; the CI demonstrated non-inferiority of DTRT to ncVMAT for motion sickness in healthy volunteers.