Laurent Cazor , Lawrence Christopher Duncan , David Paul Watling , Otto Anker Nielsen , Thomas Kjær Rasmussen
{"title":"考虑异方差、重叠和选择集形成的封闭式有界路径选择模型","authors":"Laurent Cazor , Lawrence Christopher Duncan , David Paul Watling , Otto Anker Nielsen , Thomas Kjær Rasmussen","doi":"10.1016/j.trb.2025.103275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Multinomial Logit (MNL) model is widely used in route choice modelling due to its simple closed-form choice probability function. However, MNL assumes that the error terms are independently and identically distributed with infinite support. As a result, it imposes homoscedasticity, meaning that long and short trips share the same error variance, disregards correlations between overlapping routes, and assigns non-zero choice probabilities to all available routes, regardless of their cost. This paper addresses these limitations by developing a closed-form route choice model. We introduce the Bounded q-Product Logit (BqPL) model, which incorporates heteroscedastic error terms with bounded support. The parameter <span><math><mi>q</mi></math></span> controls the rate at which error term variance increases with trip cost, and routes that violate cost bounds receive zero choice probabilities, implicitly defining the route choice set. Furthermore, we extend the BqPL model to account for correlations between overlapping routes by integrating path size correction terms within the choice probability function, resulting in the Bounded Path Size q-Product Logit (BPSqPL) model. We illustrate the properties of the BPSqPL model on small-scale networks, contrasting it with a range of existing choice models into which it can collapse. We then present a method to estimate the model parameters and standard errors, using bootstrapping. Finally, we estimate the model using a large-scale bicycle route choice case study, comparing its goodness-of-fit, interpretability, and forecasting ability with relevant collapsing models. We also test the impact of the choice set size on the estimated parameters. The results underscore the importance of addressing the three key limitations of the MNL model and demonstrate the effectiveness of the BPSqPL model in doing so.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part B-Methodological","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 103275"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A closed-form bounded route choice model accounting for heteroscedasticity, overlap, and choice set formation\",\"authors\":\"Laurent Cazor , Lawrence Christopher Duncan , David Paul Watling , Otto Anker Nielsen , Thomas Kjær Rasmussen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trb.2025.103275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Multinomial Logit (MNL) model is widely used in route choice modelling due to its simple closed-form choice probability function. However, MNL assumes that the error terms are independently and identically distributed with infinite support. As a result, it imposes homoscedasticity, meaning that long and short trips share the same error variance, disregards correlations between overlapping routes, and assigns non-zero choice probabilities to all available routes, regardless of their cost. This paper addresses these limitations by developing a closed-form route choice model. We introduce the Bounded q-Product Logit (BqPL) model, which incorporates heteroscedastic error terms with bounded support. The parameter <span><math><mi>q</mi></math></span> controls the rate at which error term variance increases with trip cost, and routes that violate cost bounds receive zero choice probabilities, implicitly defining the route choice set. Furthermore, we extend the BqPL model to account for correlations between overlapping routes by integrating path size correction terms within the choice probability function, resulting in the Bounded Path Size q-Product Logit (BPSqPL) model. We illustrate the properties of the BPSqPL model on small-scale networks, contrasting it with a range of existing choice models into which it can collapse. We then present a method to estimate the model parameters and standard errors, using bootstrapping. Finally, we estimate the model using a large-scale bicycle route choice case study, comparing its goodness-of-fit, interpretability, and forecasting ability with relevant collapsing models. We also test the impact of the choice set size on the estimated parameters. The results underscore the importance of addressing the three key limitations of the MNL model and demonstrate the effectiveness of the BPSqPL model in doing so.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part B-Methodological\",\"volume\":\"199 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part B-Methodological\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261525001249\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part B-Methodological","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261525001249","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A closed-form bounded route choice model accounting for heteroscedasticity, overlap, and choice set formation
The Multinomial Logit (MNL) model is widely used in route choice modelling due to its simple closed-form choice probability function. However, MNL assumes that the error terms are independently and identically distributed with infinite support. As a result, it imposes homoscedasticity, meaning that long and short trips share the same error variance, disregards correlations between overlapping routes, and assigns non-zero choice probabilities to all available routes, regardless of their cost. This paper addresses these limitations by developing a closed-form route choice model. We introduce the Bounded q-Product Logit (BqPL) model, which incorporates heteroscedastic error terms with bounded support. The parameter controls the rate at which error term variance increases with trip cost, and routes that violate cost bounds receive zero choice probabilities, implicitly defining the route choice set. Furthermore, we extend the BqPL model to account for correlations between overlapping routes by integrating path size correction terms within the choice probability function, resulting in the Bounded Path Size q-Product Logit (BPSqPL) model. We illustrate the properties of the BPSqPL model on small-scale networks, contrasting it with a range of existing choice models into which it can collapse. We then present a method to estimate the model parameters and standard errors, using bootstrapping. Finally, we estimate the model using a large-scale bicycle route choice case study, comparing its goodness-of-fit, interpretability, and forecasting ability with relevant collapsing models. We also test the impact of the choice set size on the estimated parameters. The results underscore the importance of addressing the three key limitations of the MNL model and demonstrate the effectiveness of the BPSqPL model in doing so.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research: Part B publishes papers on all methodological aspects of the subject, particularly those that require mathematical analysis. The general theme of the journal is the development and solution of problems that are adequately motivated to deal with important aspects of the design and/or analysis of transportation systems. Areas covered include: traffic flow; design and analysis of transportation networks; control and scheduling; optimization; queuing theory; logistics; supply chains; development and application of statistical, econometric and mathematical models to address transportation problems; cost models; pricing and/or investment; traveler or shipper behavior; cost-benefit methodologies.