{"title":"神经影像学在脑死亡诊断中的作用:放射学协议的回顾和标准化的需要","authors":"Giulia Iacobellis , Alessia Leggio , Cecilia Salzillo , Miriam Solenne , Andrea Marzullo","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Brain death, defined as the irreversible cessation of all brain functions, including the brainstem, is a critical concept in modern medicine, particularly in the context of organ transplantation. The diagnosis of brain death relies primarily on a thorough clinical neurological examination, which assesses the absence of brainstem reflexes, coma, and apnoea. This paper underscores the critical role of neuroimaging-based ancillary tests in enhancing the accuracy of brain death determination and calls for harmonization of protocols to address existing disparities and improve clinical practice worldwide. The use of ancillary tests, particularly neuroimaging techniques plays a crucial role in confirming the diagnosis, especially in cases where clinical examination is inconclusive or confounded by factors such as drug intoxication or hypothermia. These tests provide objective evidence of the absence of cerebral blood, thereby supporting the clinical determination of brain death. Despite global consensus on the importance of the clinical neurological examination in diagnosing brain death, significant variations exist between countries regarding the use of ancillary tests, the number of required clinical examinations, observation periods, and the number of physicians involved in the determination process. The discrepancies among international guidelines, highlight the need for standardized to ensure consistency and reliability in brain death diagnosis, particularly in the context of organ transplantation, where timely and accurate diagnosis is essential. This literature review examines brain death in the context of organ donation, highlighting the differences in diagnostic protocols worldwide. It emphasises the importance of clinical and neuroimaging tests for accurate diagnosis and the need to standardise international guidelines to improve clinical practice and ensure timely and reliable decisions, particularly in organ transplantation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 112247"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of neuroimaging in brain death diagnosis: a review of radiological protocols and the need for standardization\",\"authors\":\"Giulia Iacobellis , Alessia Leggio , Cecilia Salzillo , Miriam Solenne , Andrea Marzullo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Brain death, defined as the irreversible cessation of all brain functions, including the brainstem, is a critical concept in modern medicine, particularly in the context of organ transplantation. The diagnosis of brain death relies primarily on a thorough clinical neurological examination, which assesses the absence of brainstem reflexes, coma, and apnoea. This paper underscores the critical role of neuroimaging-based ancillary tests in enhancing the accuracy of brain death determination and calls for harmonization of protocols to address existing disparities and improve clinical practice worldwide. The use of ancillary tests, particularly neuroimaging techniques plays a crucial role in confirming the diagnosis, especially in cases where clinical examination is inconclusive or confounded by factors such as drug intoxication or hypothermia. These tests provide objective evidence of the absence of cerebral blood, thereby supporting the clinical determination of brain death. Despite global consensus on the importance of the clinical neurological examination in diagnosing brain death, significant variations exist between countries regarding the use of ancillary tests, the number of required clinical examinations, observation periods, and the number of physicians involved in the determination process. The discrepancies among international guidelines, highlight the need for standardized to ensure consistency and reliability in brain death diagnosis, particularly in the context of organ transplantation, where timely and accurate diagnosis is essential. This literature review examines brain death in the context of organ donation, highlighting the differences in diagnostic protocols worldwide. It emphasises the importance of clinical and neuroimaging tests for accurate diagnosis and the need to standardise international guidelines to improve clinical practice and ensure timely and reliable decisions, particularly in organ transplantation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"190 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X2500333X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X2500333X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
The role of neuroimaging in brain death diagnosis: a review of radiological protocols and the need for standardization
Brain death, defined as the irreversible cessation of all brain functions, including the brainstem, is a critical concept in modern medicine, particularly in the context of organ transplantation. The diagnosis of brain death relies primarily on a thorough clinical neurological examination, which assesses the absence of brainstem reflexes, coma, and apnoea. This paper underscores the critical role of neuroimaging-based ancillary tests in enhancing the accuracy of brain death determination and calls for harmonization of protocols to address existing disparities and improve clinical practice worldwide. The use of ancillary tests, particularly neuroimaging techniques plays a crucial role in confirming the diagnosis, especially in cases where clinical examination is inconclusive or confounded by factors such as drug intoxication or hypothermia. These tests provide objective evidence of the absence of cerebral blood, thereby supporting the clinical determination of brain death. Despite global consensus on the importance of the clinical neurological examination in diagnosing brain death, significant variations exist between countries regarding the use of ancillary tests, the number of required clinical examinations, observation periods, and the number of physicians involved in the determination process. The discrepancies among international guidelines, highlight the need for standardized to ensure consistency and reliability in brain death diagnosis, particularly in the context of organ transplantation, where timely and accurate diagnosis is essential. This literature review examines brain death in the context of organ donation, highlighting the differences in diagnostic protocols worldwide. It emphasises the importance of clinical and neuroimaging tests for accurate diagnosis and the need to standardise international guidelines to improve clinical practice and ensure timely and reliable decisions, particularly in organ transplantation.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field.
Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.