fda批准的药物在药代动力学、安全性和有效性方面存在种族和民族差异的特征和民族敏感性评价。

IF 2.3 4区 医学
Kei Fukuhara, Yusuke Tanetsugu, Shinsuke Wada, Chieko Muto, Norisuke Kawai
{"title":"fda批准的药物在药代动力学、安全性和有效性方面存在种族和民族差异的特征和民族敏感性评价。","authors":"Kei Fukuhara, Yusuke Tanetsugu, Shinsuke Wada, Chieko Muto, Norisuke Kawai","doi":"10.1002/jcph.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Racial and ethnic differences in drug disposition and response may have a significant impact on its risk-benefit balance. Therefore, it is important to examine whether an investigational drug has characteristics that make the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and efficacy likely to be affected by intrinsic and extrinsic ethnic factors based on ethnic sensitivity assessment. This assessment is recommended by the latest Japanese guideline (issued in December 2023) for Japanese phase 1 studies before participation in multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs). To comprehensively understand characteristics and ethnic sensitivity of drugs that seem to have racial/ethnic differences in its disposition and response, we investigated 620 new molecular entities (NMEs) approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2008 and 2023. Of those, only 6.5% (40 NMEs) reported racial/ethnic differences in the PK (5.0%), safety (1.6%), and/or efficacy (0.6%) in the FDA drug labeling, with only one NME (0.16%) having a clinically significant PK difference which requires a reduced starting dose in East Asian patients. Additionally, 4.4% of 620 NMEs reported differences in the pharmacogenetics for drug-metabolizing enzymes. The comprehensive evaluation of characteristics and ethnic sensitivity of 40 NMEs with racial/ethnic differences in the PK, safety, and/or efficacy indicated two key findings. First, participation in MRCTs from various regions as early as possible is much more important than conduct of an additional phase 1 study in a specific region/country. Second, more attention and deeper evaluation of Asian PK would be needed for drugs with low bioavailability in the overall drug development.</p>","PeriodicalId":48908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Characteristics and Ethnic Sensitivity for FDA-Approved Drugs with Racial and Ethnic Differences in Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy.\",\"authors\":\"Kei Fukuhara, Yusuke Tanetsugu, Shinsuke Wada, Chieko Muto, Norisuke Kawai\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcph.70065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Racial and ethnic differences in drug disposition and response may have a significant impact on its risk-benefit balance. Therefore, it is important to examine whether an investigational drug has characteristics that make the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and efficacy likely to be affected by intrinsic and extrinsic ethnic factors based on ethnic sensitivity assessment. This assessment is recommended by the latest Japanese guideline (issued in December 2023) for Japanese phase 1 studies before participation in multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs). To comprehensively understand characteristics and ethnic sensitivity of drugs that seem to have racial/ethnic differences in its disposition and response, we investigated 620 new molecular entities (NMEs) approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2008 and 2023. Of those, only 6.5% (40 NMEs) reported racial/ethnic differences in the PK (5.0%), safety (1.6%), and/or efficacy (0.6%) in the FDA drug labeling, with only one NME (0.16%) having a clinically significant PK difference which requires a reduced starting dose in East Asian patients. Additionally, 4.4% of 620 NMEs reported differences in the pharmacogenetics for drug-metabolizing enzymes. The comprehensive evaluation of characteristics and ethnic sensitivity of 40 NMEs with racial/ethnic differences in the PK, safety, and/or efficacy indicated two key findings. First, participation in MRCTs from various regions as early as possible is much more important than conduct of an additional phase 1 study in a specific region/country. Second, more attention and deeper evaluation of Asian PK would be needed for drugs with low bioavailability in the overall drug development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.70065\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.70065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

药物处置和反应的种族和民族差异可能对其风险-收益平衡产生重大影响。因此,基于民族敏感性评估,研究药物是否具有使药代动力学(PK)、安全性和有效性可能受到内在和外在民族因素影响的特征是很重要的。日本最新指南(2023年12月发布)建议在参与多区域临床试验(mrct)之前进行日本1期研究。为了全面了解在处置和反应上似乎存在种族/民族差异的药物的特征和种族敏感性,我们调查了2008年至2023年间美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的620种新分子实体(NMEs)。其中,只有6.5%(40个NME)在FDA药品标签中报告了PK(5.0%)、安全性(1.6%)和/或有效性(0.6%)的种族/民族差异,只有1个NME(0.16%)在东亚患者中具有临床显著的PK差异,需要降低起始剂量。此外,620个NMEs中有4.4%报告了药物代谢酶的药物遗传学差异。对40种NMEs的特征和种族敏感性进行综合评估,这些NMEs在PK、安全性和/或有效性方面存在种族/民族差异,得出了两个关键结论。首先,尽早参与来自不同地区的mrct比在特定地区/国家进行额外的1期研究重要得多。其次,在整体药物开发中,对于生物利用度较低的药物,需要更多的关注和更深入的评价亚洲PK。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Characteristics and Ethnic Sensitivity for FDA-Approved Drugs with Racial and Ethnic Differences in Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy.

Racial and ethnic differences in drug disposition and response may have a significant impact on its risk-benefit balance. Therefore, it is important to examine whether an investigational drug has characteristics that make the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and efficacy likely to be affected by intrinsic and extrinsic ethnic factors based on ethnic sensitivity assessment. This assessment is recommended by the latest Japanese guideline (issued in December 2023) for Japanese phase 1 studies before participation in multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs). To comprehensively understand characteristics and ethnic sensitivity of drugs that seem to have racial/ethnic differences in its disposition and response, we investigated 620 new molecular entities (NMEs) approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2008 and 2023. Of those, only 6.5% (40 NMEs) reported racial/ethnic differences in the PK (5.0%), safety (1.6%), and/or efficacy (0.6%) in the FDA drug labeling, with only one NME (0.16%) having a clinically significant PK difference which requires a reduced starting dose in East Asian patients. Additionally, 4.4% of 620 NMEs reported differences in the pharmacogenetics for drug-metabolizing enzymes. The comprehensive evaluation of characteristics and ethnic sensitivity of 40 NMEs with racial/ethnic differences in the PK, safety, and/or efficacy indicated two key findings. First, participation in MRCTs from various regions as early as possible is much more important than conduct of an additional phase 1 study in a specific region/country. Second, more attention and deeper evaluation of Asian PK would be needed for drugs with low bioavailability in the overall drug development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
3.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (JCP) is a Human Pharmacology journal designed to provide physicians, pharmacists, research scientists, regulatory scientists, drug developers and academic colleagues a forum to present research in all aspects of Clinical Pharmacology. This includes original research in pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics/pharmacogenomics, pharmacometrics, physiologic based pharmacokinetic modeling, drug interactions, therapeutic drug monitoring, regulatory sciences (including unique methods of data analysis), special population studies, drug development, pharmacovigilance, womens’ health, pediatric pharmacology, and pharmacodynamics. Additionally, JCP publishes review articles, commentaries and educational manuscripts. The Journal also serves as an instrument to disseminate Public Policy statements from the American College of Clinical Pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信