正念减压法适用于有心理社会脆弱性的孕妇——丹麦一家医院门诊环境的随机可行性试验。

IF 1.6 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Sine Skovbjerg, Michelle Kolls, Anette Kjærbye-Thygesen, Lone Overby Fjorback
{"title":"正念减压法适用于有心理社会脆弱性的孕妇——丹麦一家医院门诊环境的随机可行性试验。","authors":"Sine Skovbjerg, Michelle Kolls, Anette Kjærbye-Thygesen, Lone Overby Fjorback","doi":"10.1186/s40814-025-01670-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Supporting prenatal mental health in women with a preconception history of mental disorders or psychosocial vulnerability is important for a positive transition to parenthood. There is a need for more evidence-based and non-pharmacological mental health interventions in antenatal care. The primary objective of this trial was to evaluate the feasibility of prenatal MBSR, which is an adaption of Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR). This to inform a randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods/design: </strong>The trial was conducted at an obstetric outpatient clinic at Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Denmark. The outpatient clinic specializes in antenatal care for pregnant women with psychosocial vulnerabilities. Pregnant women were randomly assigned to an intervention group receiving prenatal MBSR or a waitlist control group. The primary outcome was the feasibility of a full-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT). Second, to examine trends in self-reported outcomes, i.e., mental well-being, perceived stress, anxiety, depression, decentering, reflective functioning, mindfulness, and self-compassion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 123 eligible women, 73 consented to participate (59.3%). The majority (75.3%) were nulliparous. The mean age was 30.7 (SD 4.7) years, and most participants were employed (74%) and living with a partner (93.1%) at the time of recruitment. The majority of participants had a history of one or more mental disorders. Most frequently depression or an anxiety disorder. For the intervention group (n = 37), 54.1% completed the prenatal MBSR program. The loss to follow-up was 56.8% for the intervention group (n = 21) and 50% for the waitlist control group (n = 18). For the secondary outcomes, all variables except for reflective functioning pointed in the expected direction, e.g., improved mental well-being, reduced mental distress, and more self-compassion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results from this trial suggest that prenatal MBSR is a feasible intervention for a clinical setting, supporting the conduct of an RCT. Strategies for improving adherence and reducing the extent of missing data would be advisable in a future RCT. Overall, there is a need for more evidence-based and non-pharmacological interventions addressing prenatal mental health. Results from a future RCT could thus be of relevance to antenatal care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT04571190, September 30, 2020 (ClinicalTrials.gov).</p>","PeriodicalId":20176,"journal":{"name":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","volume":"11 1","pages":"86"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12181856/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction adapted to pregnant women with psychosocial vulnerabilities - a randomized feasibility trial in a Danish hospital-based outpatient setting.\",\"authors\":\"Sine Skovbjerg, Michelle Kolls, Anette Kjærbye-Thygesen, Lone Overby Fjorback\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40814-025-01670-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Supporting prenatal mental health in women with a preconception history of mental disorders or psychosocial vulnerability is important for a positive transition to parenthood. There is a need for more evidence-based and non-pharmacological mental health interventions in antenatal care. The primary objective of this trial was to evaluate the feasibility of prenatal MBSR, which is an adaption of Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR). This to inform a randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods/design: </strong>The trial was conducted at an obstetric outpatient clinic at Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Denmark. The outpatient clinic specializes in antenatal care for pregnant women with psychosocial vulnerabilities. Pregnant women were randomly assigned to an intervention group receiving prenatal MBSR or a waitlist control group. The primary outcome was the feasibility of a full-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT). Second, to examine trends in self-reported outcomes, i.e., mental well-being, perceived stress, anxiety, depression, decentering, reflective functioning, mindfulness, and self-compassion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 123 eligible women, 73 consented to participate (59.3%). The majority (75.3%) were nulliparous. The mean age was 30.7 (SD 4.7) years, and most participants were employed (74%) and living with a partner (93.1%) at the time of recruitment. The majority of participants had a history of one or more mental disorders. Most frequently depression or an anxiety disorder. For the intervention group (n = 37), 54.1% completed the prenatal MBSR program. The loss to follow-up was 56.8% for the intervention group (n = 21) and 50% for the waitlist control group (n = 18). For the secondary outcomes, all variables except for reflective functioning pointed in the expected direction, e.g., improved mental well-being, reduced mental distress, and more self-compassion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results from this trial suggest that prenatal MBSR is a feasible intervention for a clinical setting, supporting the conduct of an RCT. Strategies for improving adherence and reducing the extent of missing data would be advisable in a future RCT. Overall, there is a need for more evidence-based and non-pharmacological interventions addressing prenatal mental health. Results from a future RCT could thus be of relevance to antenatal care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT04571190, September 30, 2020 (ClinicalTrials.gov).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pilot and Feasibility Studies\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12181856/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pilot and Feasibility Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-025-01670-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-025-01670-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:支持有孕前精神障碍史或心理社会脆弱性妇女的产前心理健康对积极过渡到为人父母很重要。在产前保健中需要更多以证据为基础的非药物心理健康干预措施。本试验的主要目的是评估产前正念减压(MBSR)的可行性,这是正念减压(MBSR)的一种适应。这为随机对照试验提供了信息。方法/设计:试验在哥本哈根大学医院的产科门诊进行,Amager和Hvidovre,丹麦。门诊诊所专门为有社会心理脆弱性的孕妇提供产前护理。孕妇被随机分配到接受产前正念减压的干预组或候补对照组。主要结果是一项全面随机对照试验(RCT)的可行性。第二,检查自我报告结果的趋势,即心理健康,感知压力,焦虑,抑郁,分散,反思功能,正念和自我同情。结果:123名符合条件的女性中,73名同意参加(59.3%)。大多数(75.3%)为未生育。平均年龄为30.7岁(SD 4.7),大多数参与者在招募时都有工作(74%)并与伴侣住在一起(93.1%)。大多数参与者都有一种或多种精神障碍病史。最常见的是抑郁症或焦虑症。干预组(n = 37), 54.1%的人完成了产前正念减压计划。干预组(n = 21)的随访失失率为56.8%,等候名单对照组(n = 18)的失失率为50%。对于次要结果,除了反思功能外,所有变量都指向预期的方向,例如,改善了心理健康,减少了心理痛苦,增加了自我同情。结论:本试验的结果表明,产前正念减压是一种可行的临床干预措施,支持进行随机对照试验。在未来的随机对照试验中,提高依从性和减少数据缺失程度的策略是可取的。总的来说,需要更多以证据为基础的非药物干预措施来解决产前心理健康问题。因此,未来的随机对照试验结果可能与产前护理相关。试验注册:NCT04571190, 2020年9月30日(ClinicalTrials.gov)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction adapted to pregnant women with psychosocial vulnerabilities - a randomized feasibility trial in a Danish hospital-based outpatient setting.

Background: Supporting prenatal mental health in women with a preconception history of mental disorders or psychosocial vulnerability is important for a positive transition to parenthood. There is a need for more evidence-based and non-pharmacological mental health interventions in antenatal care. The primary objective of this trial was to evaluate the feasibility of prenatal MBSR, which is an adaption of Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR). This to inform a randomized controlled trial.

Methods/design: The trial was conducted at an obstetric outpatient clinic at Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Denmark. The outpatient clinic specializes in antenatal care for pregnant women with psychosocial vulnerabilities. Pregnant women were randomly assigned to an intervention group receiving prenatal MBSR or a waitlist control group. The primary outcome was the feasibility of a full-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT). Second, to examine trends in self-reported outcomes, i.e., mental well-being, perceived stress, anxiety, depression, decentering, reflective functioning, mindfulness, and self-compassion.

Results: Of 123 eligible women, 73 consented to participate (59.3%). The majority (75.3%) were nulliparous. The mean age was 30.7 (SD 4.7) years, and most participants were employed (74%) and living with a partner (93.1%) at the time of recruitment. The majority of participants had a history of one or more mental disorders. Most frequently depression or an anxiety disorder. For the intervention group (n = 37), 54.1% completed the prenatal MBSR program. The loss to follow-up was 56.8% for the intervention group (n = 21) and 50% for the waitlist control group (n = 18). For the secondary outcomes, all variables except for reflective functioning pointed in the expected direction, e.g., improved mental well-being, reduced mental distress, and more self-compassion.

Conclusions: The results from this trial suggest that prenatal MBSR is a feasible intervention for a clinical setting, supporting the conduct of an RCT. Strategies for improving adherence and reducing the extent of missing data would be advisable in a future RCT. Overall, there is a need for more evidence-based and non-pharmacological interventions addressing prenatal mental health. Results from a future RCT could thus be of relevance to antenatal care.

Trial registration: NCT04571190, September 30, 2020 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Pilot and Feasibility Studies Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
241
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Pilot and Feasibility Studies encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of pilot and feasibility studies in biomedicine. The journal publishes research articles that are intended to directly influence future clinical trials or large scale observational studies, as well as protocols, commentaries and methodology articles. The journal also ensures that the results of all well-conducted, peer-reviewed, pilot and feasibility studies are published, regardless of outcome or significance of findings. Pilot and feasibility studies are increasingly conducted prior to a full randomized controlled trial. However, these studies often lack clear objectives, many remain unpublished, and there is confusion over the meanings of the words “pilot” and “feasibility”. Pilot and Feasibility Studies provides a forum for discussion around this key aspect of the scientific process, and seeks to ensure that these studies are published, so as to complete the publication thread for clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信