在日本预防偏头痛的有效性和安全性:一项双盲,随机对照试验。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Headache Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-20 DOI:10.1111/head.14995
Shigekazu Kitamura, Yasuhiko Matsumori, Toshimasa Yamamoto, Tomofumi Ishikawa, Yuko Hoshino, Hiroki Yoshimatsu, Alexandra Thiry, Akio Arakawa, Robert Croop, Terence Fullerton, Fumihiko Sakai, Takao Takeshima
{"title":"在日本预防偏头痛的有效性和安全性:一项双盲,随机对照试验。","authors":"Shigekazu Kitamura, Yasuhiko Matsumori, Toshimasa Yamamoto, Tomofumi Ishikawa, Yuko Hoshino, Hiroki Yoshimatsu, Alexandra Thiry, Akio Arakawa, Robert Croop, Terence Fullerton, Fumihiko Sakai, Takao Takeshima","doi":"10.1111/head.14995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives/background: </strong>This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of the oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist rimegepant relative to placebo as a preventive treatment for migraine in Japan. This was the first randomized placebo-controlled trial of rimegepant for the preventive treatment of migraine to be conducted outside the United States and the second conducted globally.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this phase 3, double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial, conducted August 9, 2022 through January 18, 2024, adults in Japan with a history of 4-18 migraine attacks/month of moderate or severe pain intensity completed a 28-day observation phase and then took rimegepant 75 mg or placebo every other day during the 12-week double-blind treatment phase. The primary endpoint was the mean change from the observation phase in the number of monthly migraine days in the last 4 weeks of the double-blind treatment phase. Safety was assessed based on the frequency of adverse events and laboratory test abnormalities during the double-blind treatment phase.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 484 (efficacy) and 496 (safety) treated participants were evaluable. During the observation phase, participants in the rimegepant and placebo groups, respectively, reported a mean (SD) of 9.3 (3.1) and 9.0 (3.1) monthly migraine days. The study met its primary endpoint with a statistically significant difference in mean change from the observation phase in the number of monthly migraine days in the last 4 weeks of the double-blind treatment phase (difference rimegepant vs. placebo: -1.1 [95% confidence interval = -1.73 to -0.38], p = 0.002). In the rimegepant and placebo groups, respectively, 54.7% and 41.0% of participants reported adverse events and 0.8% and 0.4% reported serious adverse events during the double-blind treatment phase. No signal of drug-induced liver injury due to rimegepant was identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rimegepant 75 mg every other day demonstrated efficacy superior to that of placebo for the preventive treatment of migraine, with a favorable safety profile. NCT05399485.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>This study tested the effectiveness of rimegepant for migraine prevention in Japan. Results showed that rimegepant was more effective than placebo in reducing monthly migraine days, with very few adverse effects. These results support the previous findings from a clinical study conducted in the United States and broaden them to a wider population.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"1403-1412"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12455392/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of rimegepant for the preventive treatment of migraine in Japan: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Shigekazu Kitamura, Yasuhiko Matsumori, Toshimasa Yamamoto, Tomofumi Ishikawa, Yuko Hoshino, Hiroki Yoshimatsu, Alexandra Thiry, Akio Arakawa, Robert Croop, Terence Fullerton, Fumihiko Sakai, Takao Takeshima\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/head.14995\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives/background: </strong>This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of the oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist rimegepant relative to placebo as a preventive treatment for migraine in Japan. This was the first randomized placebo-controlled trial of rimegepant for the preventive treatment of migraine to be conducted outside the United States and the second conducted globally.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this phase 3, double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial, conducted August 9, 2022 through January 18, 2024, adults in Japan with a history of 4-18 migraine attacks/month of moderate or severe pain intensity completed a 28-day observation phase and then took rimegepant 75 mg or placebo every other day during the 12-week double-blind treatment phase. The primary endpoint was the mean change from the observation phase in the number of monthly migraine days in the last 4 weeks of the double-blind treatment phase. Safety was assessed based on the frequency of adverse events and laboratory test abnormalities during the double-blind treatment phase.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 484 (efficacy) and 496 (safety) treated participants were evaluable. During the observation phase, participants in the rimegepant and placebo groups, respectively, reported a mean (SD) of 9.3 (3.1) and 9.0 (3.1) monthly migraine days. The study met its primary endpoint with a statistically significant difference in mean change from the observation phase in the number of monthly migraine days in the last 4 weeks of the double-blind treatment phase (difference rimegepant vs. placebo: -1.1 [95% confidence interval = -1.73 to -0.38], p = 0.002). In the rimegepant and placebo groups, respectively, 54.7% and 41.0% of participants reported adverse events and 0.8% and 0.4% reported serious adverse events during the double-blind treatment phase. No signal of drug-induced liver injury due to rimegepant was identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rimegepant 75 mg every other day demonstrated efficacy superior to that of placebo for the preventive treatment of migraine, with a favorable safety profile. NCT05399485.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>This study tested the effectiveness of rimegepant for migraine prevention in Japan. Results showed that rimegepant was more effective than placebo in reducing monthly migraine days, with very few adverse effects. These results support the previous findings from a clinical study conducted in the United States and broaden them to a wider population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Headache\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1403-1412\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12455392/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Headache\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14995\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14995","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的/背景:本研究在日本进行,比较口服降钙素基因相关肽受体拮抗剂rimegepant与安慰剂作为偏头痛预防治疗的疗效。这是第一个在美国以外进行的偏头痛预防性治疗的随机安慰剂对照试验,也是第二个在全球范围内进行的试验。方法:在这项于2022年8月9日至2024年1月18日进行的3期双盲、随机、多中心试验中,患有中度或重度疼痛/月4-18次偏头痛病史的日本成年人完成了28天的观察期,然后在12周的双盲治疗阶段每隔一天服用75 mg或安慰剂。主要终点是双盲治疗期最后4周观察期每月偏头痛天数的平均变化。安全性是根据在双盲治疗阶段不良事件的频率和实验室检查异常来评估的。结果:共有484名(有效性)和496名(安全性)治疗参与者可评估。在观察阶段,安慰剂组和安慰剂组的参与者分别报告了平均(SD) 9.3(3.1)和9.0(3.1)个月偏头痛天数。该研究达到了其主要终点,双盲治疗期最后4周每月偏头痛天数的平均变化与观察期相比有统计学显著差异(差异巨大:-1.1[95%置信区间= -1.73至-0.38],p = 0.002)。在双盲治疗阶段,分别有54.7%和41.0%的参与者报告了不良事件,0.8%和0.4%的参与者报告了严重不良事件。未发现药物性肝损伤的信号。结论:Rimegepant每隔一天服用75mg,其预防偏头痛的疗效优于安慰剂,且安全性较好。NCT05399485。摘要:本研究在日本测试了利莫止预防偏头痛的有效性。结果显示,rimegepant在减少每月偏头痛天数方面比安慰剂更有效,副作用很少。这些结果支持了先前在美国进行的一项临床研究的发现,并将其扩展到更广泛的人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efficacy and safety of rimegepant for the preventive treatment of migraine in Japan: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Efficacy and safety of rimegepant for the preventive treatment of migraine in Japan: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Efficacy and safety of rimegepant for the preventive treatment of migraine in Japan: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Efficacy and safety of rimegepant for the preventive treatment of migraine in Japan: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Objectives/background: This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of the oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist rimegepant relative to placebo as a preventive treatment for migraine in Japan. This was the first randomized placebo-controlled trial of rimegepant for the preventive treatment of migraine to be conducted outside the United States and the second conducted globally.

Methods: In this phase 3, double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial, conducted August 9, 2022 through January 18, 2024, adults in Japan with a history of 4-18 migraine attacks/month of moderate or severe pain intensity completed a 28-day observation phase and then took rimegepant 75 mg or placebo every other day during the 12-week double-blind treatment phase. The primary endpoint was the mean change from the observation phase in the number of monthly migraine days in the last 4 weeks of the double-blind treatment phase. Safety was assessed based on the frequency of adverse events and laboratory test abnormalities during the double-blind treatment phase.

Results: A total of 484 (efficacy) and 496 (safety) treated participants were evaluable. During the observation phase, participants in the rimegepant and placebo groups, respectively, reported a mean (SD) of 9.3 (3.1) and 9.0 (3.1) monthly migraine days. The study met its primary endpoint with a statistically significant difference in mean change from the observation phase in the number of monthly migraine days in the last 4 weeks of the double-blind treatment phase (difference rimegepant vs. placebo: -1.1 [95% confidence interval = -1.73 to -0.38], p = 0.002). In the rimegepant and placebo groups, respectively, 54.7% and 41.0% of participants reported adverse events and 0.8% and 0.4% reported serious adverse events during the double-blind treatment phase. No signal of drug-induced liver injury due to rimegepant was identified.

Conclusion: Rimegepant 75 mg every other day demonstrated efficacy superior to that of placebo for the preventive treatment of migraine, with a favorable safety profile. NCT05399485.

Plain language summary: This study tested the effectiveness of rimegepant for migraine prevention in Japan. Results showed that rimegepant was more effective than placebo in reducing monthly migraine days, with very few adverse effects. These results support the previous findings from a clinical study conducted in the United States and broaden them to a wider population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Headache
Headache 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Headache publishes original articles on all aspects of head and face pain including communications on clinical and basic research, diagnosis and management, epidemiology, genetics, and pathophysiology of primary and secondary headaches, cranial neuralgias, and pains referred to the head and face. Monthly issues feature case reports, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, and news items regarding AHS plus medicolegal and socioeconomic aspects of head pain. This is the official journal of the American Headache Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信