无盲训练暴露于缺氧增强随后的缺氧意识。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
August Allocco, Hanna van Waart, Charlotte Jw Connell, Nicole Ye Wong, Abhi Charukonda, Nicholas Gant, Xavier Ce Vrijdag, Simon J Mitchell
{"title":"无盲训练暴露于缺氧增强随后的缺氧意识。","authors":"August Allocco, Hanna van Waart, Charlotte Jw Connell, Nicole Ye Wong, Abhi Charukonda, Nicholas Gant, Xavier Ce Vrijdag, Simon J Mitchell","doi":"10.28920/dhm55.2.136-144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Malfunctions and human errors in diving rebreathers can cause hypoxia, hyperoxia, and/or hypercapnia. We evaluated whether a prior unblinded hypoxia experience enhances a diver's ability to recognise hypoxia and initiate self-rescue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty participants were randomised to receive either an information leaflet describing hypoxia symptoms or an unblinded hypoxia experience, prior to a blinded hypoxia testing exposure during a virtual reality dive over one month later. The primary outcome was the comparison of the proportion of participants in these two groups who initiated self-rescue before reaching a peripheral oxygen saturation of 70% in the blinded exposure. An individual's 'symptom profile' was assessed by comparing symptoms during the unblinded hypoxia experience and blinded testing exposures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the blinded hypoxia testing exposure, 18/20 (90%) participants in the hypoxia experience group performed a self-initiated rescue compared to 6/18 (33%) in the information leaflet group (P < 0.001). Participants in the information leaflet group had lower mean SpO₂ (73.4% vs 81.4%, mean difference 8% [95% CI = 2.5-13.5%, P = 0.005]) and lower inhaled oxygen fraction (7.6% vs 9.4%, mean difference 1.8% [95% CI = 0.6-3.1%, P = 0.005]) at self-rescue. The most frequent and severe symptoms were light-headedness and shortness of breath. Of the 20 participants completing both hypoxia exposures, 14 (70%) had a consistent hypoxia symptom profile, which was not related to the ability to recognise hypoxia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Self-rescue was approximately three times more likely for participants who had previously experienced hypoxia compared to simply receiving information on relevant symptoms. Most participants exhibited a consistent pattern of individual symptoms, which did not result in earlier or improved detection of hypoxia.</p>","PeriodicalId":11296,"journal":{"name":"Diving and hyperbaric medicine","volume":"55 2","pages":"136-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12267069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An unblinded training exposure to hypoxia enhances subsequent hypoxia awareness.\",\"authors\":\"August Allocco, Hanna van Waart, Charlotte Jw Connell, Nicole Ye Wong, Abhi Charukonda, Nicholas Gant, Xavier Ce Vrijdag, Simon J Mitchell\",\"doi\":\"10.28920/dhm55.2.136-144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Malfunctions and human errors in diving rebreathers can cause hypoxia, hyperoxia, and/or hypercapnia. We evaluated whether a prior unblinded hypoxia experience enhances a diver's ability to recognise hypoxia and initiate self-rescue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty participants were randomised to receive either an information leaflet describing hypoxia symptoms or an unblinded hypoxia experience, prior to a blinded hypoxia testing exposure during a virtual reality dive over one month later. The primary outcome was the comparison of the proportion of participants in these two groups who initiated self-rescue before reaching a peripheral oxygen saturation of 70% in the blinded exposure. An individual's 'symptom profile' was assessed by comparing symptoms during the unblinded hypoxia experience and blinded testing exposures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the blinded hypoxia testing exposure, 18/20 (90%) participants in the hypoxia experience group performed a self-initiated rescue compared to 6/18 (33%) in the information leaflet group (P < 0.001). Participants in the information leaflet group had lower mean SpO₂ (73.4% vs 81.4%, mean difference 8% [95% CI = 2.5-13.5%, P = 0.005]) and lower inhaled oxygen fraction (7.6% vs 9.4%, mean difference 1.8% [95% CI = 0.6-3.1%, P = 0.005]) at self-rescue. The most frequent and severe symptoms were light-headedness and shortness of breath. Of the 20 participants completing both hypoxia exposures, 14 (70%) had a consistent hypoxia symptom profile, which was not related to the ability to recognise hypoxia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Self-rescue was approximately three times more likely for participants who had previously experienced hypoxia compared to simply receiving information on relevant symptoms. Most participants exhibited a consistent pattern of individual symptoms, which did not result in earlier or improved detection of hypoxia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diving and hyperbaric medicine\",\"volume\":\"55 2\",\"pages\":\"136-144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12267069/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diving and hyperbaric medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28920/dhm55.2.136-144\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diving and hyperbaric medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28920/dhm55.2.136-144","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

潜水换气器的故障和人为错误会导致缺氧、高氧和/或高碳酸血症。我们评估了先前的无盲缺氧经验是否能提高潜水员识别缺氧和启动自救的能力。方法:40名参与者被随机分配,在一个多月后的虚拟现实潜水期间进行盲法缺氧测试之前,接受描述缺氧症状的信息传单或非盲法缺氧体验。主要结果是比较这两组参与者在盲法暴露中外周氧饱和度达到70%之前开始自救的比例。个体的“症状概况”是通过比较无盲缺氧经历和盲法测试暴露期间的症状来评估的。结果:在盲法缺氧试验暴露过程中,缺氧体验组有18/20(90%)的参与者进行了主动抢救,而信息单张组有6/18(33%)的参与者进行了主动抢救(P < 0.001)。信息单张组患者在自救时平均SpO₂(73.4% vs 81.4%,平均差8% [95% CI = 2.5 ~ 13.5%, P = 0.005])和吸入氧分数(7.6% vs 9.4%,平均差1.8% [95% CI = 0.6 ~ 3.1%, P = 0.005])较低。最常见和最严重的症状是头晕和呼吸短促。在完成两种缺氧暴露的20名参与者中,14名(70%)有一致的缺氧症状,这与识别缺氧的能力无关。结论:与仅仅接受相关症状信息相比,先前经历过缺氧的参与者自救的可能性大约是其三倍。大多数参与者表现出一致的个体症状模式,这并没有导致早期或改善对缺氧的检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An unblinded training exposure to hypoxia enhances subsequent hypoxia awareness.

Introduction: Malfunctions and human errors in diving rebreathers can cause hypoxia, hyperoxia, and/or hypercapnia. We evaluated whether a prior unblinded hypoxia experience enhances a diver's ability to recognise hypoxia and initiate self-rescue.

Methods: Forty participants were randomised to receive either an information leaflet describing hypoxia symptoms or an unblinded hypoxia experience, prior to a blinded hypoxia testing exposure during a virtual reality dive over one month later. The primary outcome was the comparison of the proportion of participants in these two groups who initiated self-rescue before reaching a peripheral oxygen saturation of 70% in the blinded exposure. An individual's 'symptom profile' was assessed by comparing symptoms during the unblinded hypoxia experience and blinded testing exposures.

Results: During the blinded hypoxia testing exposure, 18/20 (90%) participants in the hypoxia experience group performed a self-initiated rescue compared to 6/18 (33%) in the information leaflet group (P < 0.001). Participants in the information leaflet group had lower mean SpO₂ (73.4% vs 81.4%, mean difference 8% [95% CI = 2.5-13.5%, P = 0.005]) and lower inhaled oxygen fraction (7.6% vs 9.4%, mean difference 1.8% [95% CI = 0.6-3.1%, P = 0.005]) at self-rescue. The most frequent and severe symptoms were light-headedness and shortness of breath. Of the 20 participants completing both hypoxia exposures, 14 (70%) had a consistent hypoxia symptom profile, which was not related to the ability to recognise hypoxia.

Conclusions: Self-rescue was approximately three times more likely for participants who had previously experienced hypoxia compared to simply receiving information on relevant symptoms. Most participants exhibited a consistent pattern of individual symptoms, which did not result in earlier or improved detection of hypoxia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diving and hyperbaric medicine
Diving and hyperbaric medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
22.20%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine (DHM) is the combined journal of the South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society (SPUMS) and the European Underwater and Baromedical Society (EUBS). It seeks to publish papers of high quality on all aspects of diving and hyperbaric medicine of interest to diving medical professionals, physicians of all specialties, scientists, members of the diving and hyperbaric industries, and divers. Manuscripts must be offered exclusively to Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, unless clearly authenticated copyright exemption accompaniesthe manuscript. All manuscripts will be subject to peer review. Accepted contributions will also be subject to editing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信