利用LACE指数分析创伤患者再入院率和死亡率。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
American Surgeon Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-21 DOI:10.1177/00031348251353801
Joan H Brown, Julie M Reichert, Isabella L Filippone, Miguel A Rosa, Anthony B Tepetitla, Nathan A Schlessinger, Kelly F Bonneville, Ryan E Ward, Lindsey L Perea
{"title":"利用LACE指数分析创伤患者再入院率和死亡率。","authors":"Joan H Brown, Julie M Reichert, Isabella L Filippone, Miguel A Rosa, Anthony B Tepetitla, Nathan A Schlessinger, Kelly F Bonneville, Ryan E Ward, Lindsey L Perea","doi":"10.1177/00031348251353801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundTrauma patients are sometimes readmitted unexpectedly soon after discharge from index admission. LACE Index measures four variables (Length of stay, Acuity of admission, Comorbidity, and prior Emergency department visits within 6 months) that are independently associated with death or readmission within 30 days of discharge from hospitalization. Our Trauma Center began utilizing LACE scores to schedule follow-ups for patients discharged home with LACE scores ≥7. We sought to determine factors related to trauma patient readmission and mortality and evaluate the impact of LACE follow-up appointments on 30-day readmission and mortality. We hypothesized that instituting LACE follow-ups would reduce readmissions and mortality.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review (1/1/21-6/30/22 and 7/1/22-12/31/23) evaluating readmission in trauma patients ≥18y before LACE (BL) and during LACE (DL) follow-up appointments. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted. A <i>P</i>-value <.05 was considered significant.Results1788 patients were included: 872 BL and 914 DL. Readmission was slightly higher DL vs BL and mortality was lower DL vs BL. Multivariable analysis showed patients with cirrhosis had an increased risk of readmission and patients with commercial insurance had a decreased risk of readmission. Multivariable analysis showed attending a follow-up did not impact risk of readmission but decreased risk of mortality.ConclusionOur data partially supported our hypothesis; attending an LACE follow-up decreased 30-day mortality but not readmission. Further investigation is warranted to validate the threshold of LACE score that will help prevent readmission and mortality in trauma patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"1251-1257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Readmission and Mortality in Trauma Patients Utilizing LACE Index.\",\"authors\":\"Joan H Brown, Julie M Reichert, Isabella L Filippone, Miguel A Rosa, Anthony B Tepetitla, Nathan A Schlessinger, Kelly F Bonneville, Ryan E Ward, Lindsey L Perea\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00031348251353801\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundTrauma patients are sometimes readmitted unexpectedly soon after discharge from index admission. LACE Index measures four variables (Length of stay, Acuity of admission, Comorbidity, and prior Emergency department visits within 6 months) that are independently associated with death or readmission within 30 days of discharge from hospitalization. Our Trauma Center began utilizing LACE scores to schedule follow-ups for patients discharged home with LACE scores ≥7. We sought to determine factors related to trauma patient readmission and mortality and evaluate the impact of LACE follow-up appointments on 30-day readmission and mortality. We hypothesized that instituting LACE follow-ups would reduce readmissions and mortality.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review (1/1/21-6/30/22 and 7/1/22-12/31/23) evaluating readmission in trauma patients ≥18y before LACE (BL) and during LACE (DL) follow-up appointments. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted. A <i>P</i>-value <.05 was considered significant.Results1788 patients were included: 872 BL and 914 DL. Readmission was slightly higher DL vs BL and mortality was lower DL vs BL. Multivariable analysis showed patients with cirrhosis had an increased risk of readmission and patients with commercial insurance had a decreased risk of readmission. Multivariable analysis showed attending a follow-up did not impact risk of readmission but decreased risk of mortality.ConclusionOur data partially supported our hypothesis; attending an LACE follow-up decreased 30-day mortality but not readmission. Further investigation is warranted to validate the threshold of LACE score that will help prevent readmission and mortality in trauma patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Surgeon\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1251-1257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Surgeon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251353801\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251353801","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:创伤患者有时会在出院后不久意外地再次入院。LACE指数测量与出院30天内死亡或再入院独立相关的4个变量(住院时间、入院急诊科急症、合并症和6个月内急诊就诊)。我们的创伤中心开始使用LACE评分来安排对LACE评分≥7的出院患者的随访。我们试图确定与创伤患者再入院和死亡率相关的因素,并评估LACE随访预约对30天再入院和死亡率的影响。我们假设建立LACE随访会降低再入院率和死亡率。方法回顾性分析(1/1/21-6/30/22和7/1/22-12/31/23)创伤患者在LACE (BL)和LACE (DL)随访前≥18y的再入院情况。进行了单变量和多变量分析。一个假定值
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Readmission and Mortality in Trauma Patients Utilizing LACE Index.

BackgroundTrauma patients are sometimes readmitted unexpectedly soon after discharge from index admission. LACE Index measures four variables (Length of stay, Acuity of admission, Comorbidity, and prior Emergency department visits within 6 months) that are independently associated with death or readmission within 30 days of discharge from hospitalization. Our Trauma Center began utilizing LACE scores to schedule follow-ups for patients discharged home with LACE scores ≥7. We sought to determine factors related to trauma patient readmission and mortality and evaluate the impact of LACE follow-up appointments on 30-day readmission and mortality. We hypothesized that instituting LACE follow-ups would reduce readmissions and mortality.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review (1/1/21-6/30/22 and 7/1/22-12/31/23) evaluating readmission in trauma patients ≥18y before LACE (BL) and during LACE (DL) follow-up appointments. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted. A P-value <.05 was considered significant.Results1788 patients were included: 872 BL and 914 DL. Readmission was slightly higher DL vs BL and mortality was lower DL vs BL. Multivariable analysis showed patients with cirrhosis had an increased risk of readmission and patients with commercial insurance had a decreased risk of readmission. Multivariable analysis showed attending a follow-up did not impact risk of readmission but decreased risk of mortality.ConclusionOur data partially supported our hypothesis; attending an LACE follow-up decreased 30-day mortality but not readmission. Further investigation is warranted to validate the threshold of LACE score that will help prevent readmission and mortality in trauma patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信