非城市地区拥有和使用电动滑板车的证据

IF 5.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION
Tobias Dürhammer , Maria Juschten , Julia Schilder , Reinhard Hössinger
{"title":"非城市地区拥有和使用电动滑板车的证据","authors":"Tobias Dürhammer ,&nbsp;Maria Juschten ,&nbsp;Julia Schilder ,&nbsp;Reinhard Hössinger","doi":"10.1016/j.tbs.2025.101088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Private e-scooters are under-researched, particularly outside urban areas. While shared e-scooters are mainly found in cities and are primarily used for short trips, private e-scooters appear better suited to replace long car trips across all regions, especially when integrated with public transport (PT). However, little is known about the ownership and use of private e-scooters, especially outside cities, due to data scarcity and the methodological challenge of reaching this dispersed population. We investigate the adoption of private e-scooters using the Diffusion of Innovations theory, drawing on a nationwide sample from Austria including both e-scooter owners and non-owners in urban and non-urban settings. We identify adopter characteristics using an ordered logit model. Results reveal contrasting relationships with travel alternatives: urban adopters own more cars, while non-urban adopters own more PT subscriptions and fewer cars compared to non-users in the respective areas. This indicates greater potential for car substitution in non-urban settings. Across both areas, typical adopters are middle-aged male workers with moderate educational levels who perceive e-scooters as practical and enjoyable. Usage patterns, derived from a travel diary of e-scooter owners, align with expectations: non-urban residents are more likely to use their e-scooter as PT feeders and car substitutes. Their lower car ownership rate compared to non-users will cause substantial additional savings. These findings underscore the need for targeted strategies to promote private e-scooter adoption and integration with PT, particularly in non-urban areas, to foster a more inclusive and less car-dependent transport system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51534,"journal":{"name":"Travel Behaviour and Society","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101088"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence on e-scooter ownership and use in non-urban areas\",\"authors\":\"Tobias Dürhammer ,&nbsp;Maria Juschten ,&nbsp;Julia Schilder ,&nbsp;Reinhard Hössinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tbs.2025.101088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Private e-scooters are under-researched, particularly outside urban areas. While shared e-scooters are mainly found in cities and are primarily used for short trips, private e-scooters appear better suited to replace long car trips across all regions, especially when integrated with public transport (PT). However, little is known about the ownership and use of private e-scooters, especially outside cities, due to data scarcity and the methodological challenge of reaching this dispersed population. We investigate the adoption of private e-scooters using the Diffusion of Innovations theory, drawing on a nationwide sample from Austria including both e-scooter owners and non-owners in urban and non-urban settings. We identify adopter characteristics using an ordered logit model. Results reveal contrasting relationships with travel alternatives: urban adopters own more cars, while non-urban adopters own more PT subscriptions and fewer cars compared to non-users in the respective areas. This indicates greater potential for car substitution in non-urban settings. Across both areas, typical adopters are middle-aged male workers with moderate educational levels who perceive e-scooters as practical and enjoyable. Usage patterns, derived from a travel diary of e-scooter owners, align with expectations: non-urban residents are more likely to use their e-scooter as PT feeders and car substitutes. Their lower car ownership rate compared to non-users will cause substantial additional savings. These findings underscore the need for targeted strategies to promote private e-scooter adoption and integration with PT, particularly in non-urban areas, to foster a more inclusive and less car-dependent transport system.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Travel Behaviour and Society\",\"volume\":\"41 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101088\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Travel Behaviour and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X25001061\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Behaviour and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X25001061","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

私人电动滑板车的研究不足,尤其是在城市以外的地区。虽然共享电动滑板车主要出现在城市,主要用于短途旅行,但私人电动滑板车似乎更适合取代所有地区的长途汽车旅行,尤其是与公共交通(PT)结合使用时。然而,由于数据稀缺和接触这些分散人群的方法挑战,人们对私人电动滑板车的所有权和使用情况知之甚少,特别是在城市以外。我们使用创新扩散理论调查了私人电动滑板车的采用情况,并从奥地利全国范围内抽取样本,包括城市和非城市环境中的电动滑板车所有者和非所有者。我们使用有序logit模型识别采用者特征。结果揭示了不同出行方式之间的对比关系:城市用户拥有更多的汽车,而非城市用户拥有更多的PT订阅,而与各自地区的非用户相比,他们拥有更少的汽车。这表明在非城市环境中,汽车替代的潜力更大。在这两个地区,典型的用户都是中等教育水平的中年男性工人,他们认为电动滑板车既实用又有趣。从电动滑板车车主的旅行日记中得出的使用模式与预期相符:非城市居民更有可能将电动滑板车作为PT的补充和汽车的替代品。与不使用汽车的人相比,他们的汽车拥有率较低,这将带来大量的额外节省。这些发现强调需要有针对性的策略来促进私人电动滑板车的采用和与PT的整合,特别是在非城市地区,以建立一个更具包容性和更少依赖汽车的交通系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evidence on e-scooter ownership and use in non-urban areas
Private e-scooters are under-researched, particularly outside urban areas. While shared e-scooters are mainly found in cities and are primarily used for short trips, private e-scooters appear better suited to replace long car trips across all regions, especially when integrated with public transport (PT). However, little is known about the ownership and use of private e-scooters, especially outside cities, due to data scarcity and the methodological challenge of reaching this dispersed population. We investigate the adoption of private e-scooters using the Diffusion of Innovations theory, drawing on a nationwide sample from Austria including both e-scooter owners and non-owners in urban and non-urban settings. We identify adopter characteristics using an ordered logit model. Results reveal contrasting relationships with travel alternatives: urban adopters own more cars, while non-urban adopters own more PT subscriptions and fewer cars compared to non-users in the respective areas. This indicates greater potential for car substitution in non-urban settings. Across both areas, typical adopters are middle-aged male workers with moderate educational levels who perceive e-scooters as practical and enjoyable. Usage patterns, derived from a travel diary of e-scooter owners, align with expectations: non-urban residents are more likely to use their e-scooter as PT feeders and car substitutes. Their lower car ownership rate compared to non-users will cause substantial additional savings. These findings underscore the need for targeted strategies to promote private e-scooter adoption and integration with PT, particularly in non-urban areas, to foster a more inclusive and less car-dependent transport system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Travel Behaviour and Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high-quality original papers which report leading edge research in theories, methodologies and applications concerning transportation issues and challenges which involve the social and spatial dimensions. In particular, it provides a discussion forum for major research in travel behaviour, transportation infrastructure, transportation and environmental issues, mobility and social sustainability, transportation geographic information systems (TGIS), transportation and quality of life, transportation data collection and analysis, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信