{"title":"地缘政治风险会阻碍全球供应链吗?","authors":"Chi Wei Su, Rongrong Dong, Meng Qin","doi":"10.1016/j.frl.2025.107811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the context of economic globalization, geopolitics has emerged as a major disruptor of global supply chains. To date, a systematic investigation into the bidirectional causal relationship between geopolitical risks (GPR) and global supply chain pressure (SCP) is lacking in the current literature. To fill this research gap, this paper explores the time-varying interrelationship between GPR and SCP using the rolling-window Granger causality test. The empirical outcomes signify negative and positive effects moving from GPR to SCP, with the latter indicating that geopolitical risks can impede global supply chains. However, this disruption cannot be continuously instituted when GPR negatively affects SCP, primarily due to global supply chain diversification. Conversely, there are negative and positive impacts from SCP to GPR, revealing that global supply chain pressures can alleviate or exacerbate geopolitical risks in specific economic circumstances. Therefore, against the backdrop of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, governments should maintain peace and strengthen cooperation to prevent the potential risks of geopolitical events. Furthermore, countries and enterprises should develop resilient supply chain ecosystems that can rapidly adapt and respond to risks, stabilising global supply chains.","PeriodicalId":12167,"journal":{"name":"Finance Research Letters","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do geopolitical risks impede the global supply chain?\",\"authors\":\"Chi Wei Su, Rongrong Dong, Meng Qin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.frl.2025.107811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the context of economic globalization, geopolitics has emerged as a major disruptor of global supply chains. To date, a systematic investigation into the bidirectional causal relationship between geopolitical risks (GPR) and global supply chain pressure (SCP) is lacking in the current literature. To fill this research gap, this paper explores the time-varying interrelationship between GPR and SCP using the rolling-window Granger causality test. The empirical outcomes signify negative and positive effects moving from GPR to SCP, with the latter indicating that geopolitical risks can impede global supply chains. However, this disruption cannot be continuously instituted when GPR negatively affects SCP, primarily due to global supply chain diversification. Conversely, there are negative and positive impacts from SCP to GPR, revealing that global supply chain pressures can alleviate or exacerbate geopolitical risks in specific economic circumstances. Therefore, against the backdrop of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, governments should maintain peace and strengthen cooperation to prevent the potential risks of geopolitical events. Furthermore, countries and enterprises should develop resilient supply chain ecosystems that can rapidly adapt and respond to risks, stabilising global supply chains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Finance Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Finance Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107811\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107811","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Do geopolitical risks impede the global supply chain?
In the context of economic globalization, geopolitics has emerged as a major disruptor of global supply chains. To date, a systematic investigation into the bidirectional causal relationship between geopolitical risks (GPR) and global supply chain pressure (SCP) is lacking in the current literature. To fill this research gap, this paper explores the time-varying interrelationship between GPR and SCP using the rolling-window Granger causality test. The empirical outcomes signify negative and positive effects moving from GPR to SCP, with the latter indicating that geopolitical risks can impede global supply chains. However, this disruption cannot be continuously instituted when GPR negatively affects SCP, primarily due to global supply chain diversification. Conversely, there are negative and positive impacts from SCP to GPR, revealing that global supply chain pressures can alleviate or exacerbate geopolitical risks in specific economic circumstances. Therefore, against the backdrop of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, governments should maintain peace and strengthen cooperation to prevent the potential risks of geopolitical events. Furthermore, countries and enterprises should develop resilient supply chain ecosystems that can rapidly adapt and respond to risks, stabilising global supply chains.
期刊介绍:
Finance Research Letters welcomes submissions across all areas of finance, aiming for rapid publication of significant new findings. The journal particularly encourages papers that provide insight into the replicability of established results, examine the cross-national applicability of previous findings, challenge existing methodologies, or demonstrate methodological contingencies.
Papers are invited in the following areas:
Actuarial studies
Alternative investments
Asset Pricing
Bankruptcy and liquidation
Banks and other Depository Institutions
Behavioral and experimental finance
Bibliometric and Scientometric studies of finance
Capital budgeting and corporate investment
Capital markets and accounting
Capital structure and payout policy
Commodities
Contagion, crises and interdependence
Corporate governance
Credit and fixed income markets and instruments
Derivatives
Emerging markets
Energy Finance and Energy Markets
Financial Econometrics
Financial History
Financial intermediation and money markets
Financial markets and marketplaces
Financial Mathematics and Econophysics
Financial Regulation and Law
Forecasting
Frontier market studies
International Finance
Market efficiency, event studies
Mergers, acquisitions and the market for corporate control
Micro Finance Institutions
Microstructure
Non-bank Financial Institutions
Personal Finance
Portfolio choice and investing
Real estate finance and investing
Risk
SME, Family and Entrepreneurial Finance