{"title":"排泄障碍患者开始直肠灌洗的社会人口学和临床预测因素。","authors":"Tanzeela Gala, Abigail Fernandes, Mehak Saini, Carlotta Sarzo, Noman Shahzad, Carlene Igbedioh, Sarah Ferdinand, Alexis Schizas, Linda Ferrari, Alison J Hainsworth","doi":"10.12968/bjon.2025.0040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rectal irrigation is recommended in patients with evacuation disorders (EDs) that are resistant to preliminary conservative treatments.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to determine the incidence and predictors of rectal irrigation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study included patients treated for EDs from a prospectively maintained database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1618 patients with ED, irrigation was started in 594, of whom 399 (67%) were started on low-volume rectal irrigation (LVRI) and the remaining 195 (33%) on high-volume rectal irrigation (HVRI). LVRI was associated with patients aged >50 years and anal incontinence, while HVRI was associated with constipation and patients aged <50 years (<i>P</i><0.001). The study also found that patients in the LVRI group were more likely to complete treatment than those in the HVRI group. No variability was found between gender, socio-economic status, ethnicity and the study findings when a comparison was made between patients who continued preliminary conservative treatments and those who started on irrigation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides predictors of rectal irrigation. Future research is needed to explore the outcome and barriers to irrigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":520014,"journal":{"name":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","volume":"34 12","pages":"626-634"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socio-demographic and clinical predictors for initiation of rectal irrigation in patients with evacuation disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Tanzeela Gala, Abigail Fernandes, Mehak Saini, Carlotta Sarzo, Noman Shahzad, Carlene Igbedioh, Sarah Ferdinand, Alexis Schizas, Linda Ferrari, Alison J Hainsworth\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/bjon.2025.0040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rectal irrigation is recommended in patients with evacuation disorders (EDs) that are resistant to preliminary conservative treatments.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to determine the incidence and predictors of rectal irrigation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study included patients treated for EDs from a prospectively maintained database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1618 patients with ED, irrigation was started in 594, of whom 399 (67%) were started on low-volume rectal irrigation (LVRI) and the remaining 195 (33%) on high-volume rectal irrigation (HVRI). LVRI was associated with patients aged >50 years and anal incontinence, while HVRI was associated with constipation and patients aged <50 years (<i>P</i><0.001). The study also found that patients in the LVRI group were more likely to complete treatment than those in the HVRI group. No variability was found between gender, socio-economic status, ethnicity and the study findings when a comparison was made between patients who continued preliminary conservative treatments and those who started on irrigation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides predictors of rectal irrigation. Future research is needed to explore the outcome and barriers to irrigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)\",\"volume\":\"34 12\",\"pages\":\"626-634\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2025.0040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2025.0040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Socio-demographic and clinical predictors for initiation of rectal irrigation in patients with evacuation disorders.
Background: Rectal irrigation is recommended in patients with evacuation disorders (EDs) that are resistant to preliminary conservative treatments.
Aim: This study aimed to determine the incidence and predictors of rectal irrigation.
Method: This study included patients treated for EDs from a prospectively maintained database.
Results: Out of 1618 patients with ED, irrigation was started in 594, of whom 399 (67%) were started on low-volume rectal irrigation (LVRI) and the remaining 195 (33%) on high-volume rectal irrigation (HVRI). LVRI was associated with patients aged >50 years and anal incontinence, while HVRI was associated with constipation and patients aged <50 years (P<0.001). The study also found that patients in the LVRI group were more likely to complete treatment than those in the HVRI group. No variability was found between gender, socio-economic status, ethnicity and the study findings when a comparison was made between patients who continued preliminary conservative treatments and those who started on irrigation.
Conclusion: This study provides predictors of rectal irrigation. Future research is needed to explore the outcome and barriers to irrigation.