排泄障碍患者开始直肠灌洗的社会人口学和临床预测因素。

Tanzeela Gala, Abigail Fernandes, Mehak Saini, Carlotta Sarzo, Noman Shahzad, Carlene Igbedioh, Sarah Ferdinand, Alexis Schizas, Linda Ferrari, Alison J Hainsworth
{"title":"排泄障碍患者开始直肠灌洗的社会人口学和临床预测因素。","authors":"Tanzeela Gala, Abigail Fernandes, Mehak Saini, Carlotta Sarzo, Noman Shahzad, Carlene Igbedioh, Sarah Ferdinand, Alexis Schizas, Linda Ferrari, Alison J Hainsworth","doi":"10.12968/bjon.2025.0040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rectal irrigation is recommended in patients with evacuation disorders (EDs) that are resistant to preliminary conservative treatments.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to determine the incidence and predictors of rectal irrigation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study included patients treated for EDs from a prospectively maintained database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1618 patients with ED, irrigation was started in 594, of whom 399 (67%) were started on low-volume rectal irrigation (LVRI) and the remaining 195 (33%) on high-volume rectal irrigation (HVRI). LVRI was associated with patients aged >50 years and anal incontinence, while HVRI was associated with constipation and patients aged <50 years (<i>P</i><0.001). The study also found that patients in the LVRI group were more likely to complete treatment than those in the HVRI group. No variability was found between gender, socio-economic status, ethnicity and the study findings when a comparison was made between patients who continued preliminary conservative treatments and those who started on irrigation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides predictors of rectal irrigation. Future research is needed to explore the outcome and barriers to irrigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":520014,"journal":{"name":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","volume":"34 12","pages":"626-634"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socio-demographic and clinical predictors for initiation of rectal irrigation in patients with evacuation disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Tanzeela Gala, Abigail Fernandes, Mehak Saini, Carlotta Sarzo, Noman Shahzad, Carlene Igbedioh, Sarah Ferdinand, Alexis Schizas, Linda Ferrari, Alison J Hainsworth\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/bjon.2025.0040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rectal irrigation is recommended in patients with evacuation disorders (EDs) that are resistant to preliminary conservative treatments.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to determine the incidence and predictors of rectal irrigation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study included patients treated for EDs from a prospectively maintained database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1618 patients with ED, irrigation was started in 594, of whom 399 (67%) were started on low-volume rectal irrigation (LVRI) and the remaining 195 (33%) on high-volume rectal irrigation (HVRI). LVRI was associated with patients aged >50 years and anal incontinence, while HVRI was associated with constipation and patients aged <50 years (<i>P</i><0.001). The study also found that patients in the LVRI group were more likely to complete treatment than those in the HVRI group. No variability was found between gender, socio-economic status, ethnicity and the study findings when a comparison was made between patients who continued preliminary conservative treatments and those who started on irrigation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides predictors of rectal irrigation. Future research is needed to explore the outcome and barriers to irrigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)\",\"volume\":\"34 12\",\"pages\":\"626-634\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2025.0040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2025.0040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:直肠冲洗推荐用于对初步保守治疗有抵抗的排空障碍(EDs)患者。目的:本研究旨在确定直肠冲洗的发生率和预测因素。方法:本研究纳入了前瞻性维护数据库中接受ed治疗的患者。结果:在1618例ED患者中,594例开始冲洗,其中399例(67%)开始使用低容量直肠冲洗(LVRI),其余195例(33%)开始使用高容量直肠冲洗(HVRI)。LVRI与bb0 ~ 50岁患者和肛门失禁相关,而HVRI与便秘和p岁患者相关。结论:本研究提供了直肠冲洗的预测因子。未来的研究需要探索灌溉的结果和障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Socio-demographic and clinical predictors for initiation of rectal irrigation in patients with evacuation disorders.

Background: Rectal irrigation is recommended in patients with evacuation disorders (EDs) that are resistant to preliminary conservative treatments.

Aim: This study aimed to determine the incidence and predictors of rectal irrigation.

Method: This study included patients treated for EDs from a prospectively maintained database.

Results: Out of 1618 patients with ED, irrigation was started in 594, of whom 399 (67%) were started on low-volume rectal irrigation (LVRI) and the remaining 195 (33%) on high-volume rectal irrigation (HVRI). LVRI was associated with patients aged >50 years and anal incontinence, while HVRI was associated with constipation and patients aged <50 years (P<0.001). The study also found that patients in the LVRI group were more likely to complete treatment than those in the HVRI group. No variability was found between gender, socio-economic status, ethnicity and the study findings when a comparison was made between patients who continued preliminary conservative treatments and those who started on irrigation.

Conclusion: This study provides predictors of rectal irrigation. Future research is needed to explore the outcome and barriers to irrigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信