在现实世界的远程症状监测程序中,对技术障碍和实施策略的患者观点。

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-23 DOI:10.1200/CCI-24-00232
Tanvi V Padalkar, Nicole L Henderson, D'Ambra N Dent, Emma Hendrix, Catherine Smith, Chao-Hui Sylvia Huang, Tara Kaufmann, Chelsea McGowan, Jennifer Young Pierce, Stacey A Ingram, Angela M Stover, Ethan M Basch, Doris Howell, Bryan J Weiner, J Nicholas Odom, Gabrielle B Rocque
{"title":"在现实世界的远程症状监测程序中,对技术障碍和实施策略的患者观点。","authors":"Tanvi V Padalkar, Nicole L Henderson, D'Ambra N Dent, Emma Hendrix, Catherine Smith, Chao-Hui Sylvia Huang, Tara Kaufmann, Chelsea McGowan, Jennifer Young Pierce, Stacey A Ingram, Angela M Stover, Ethan M Basch, Doris Howell, Bryan J Weiner, J Nicholas Odom, Gabrielle B Rocque","doi":"10.1200/CCI-24-00232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Remote symptom monitoring (RSM) using electronic patient-reported outcomes leverages digital technologies to gather real-time information on patient experiences for symptom management. This study reports a formative evaluation of technology-related barriers encountered by patients participating in RSM and implementation strategies used to address those barriers in real-world, large-scale RSM implementations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Purposive sampling was conducted to recruit patients diagnosed with cancer and participating in RSM at the University of Alabama at Birmingham and USA Health Mitchell Cancer Institute for semi-structured interviews. Interviews were coded to identify technology-related barriers using a constant comparative method. Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change list was used to address the barriers to optimize RSM implementation. Barrier-associated themes from the interviews were mapped to implementation strategies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty participants age 24-77 years, half of whom were 60 years or older, were interviewed from December 2021 to February 2024. Three barrier themes relevant to technology utilization in RSM were identified: (1) <i>accessibility concerns</i>, (2) <i>digital health literacy</i>, and (3) <i>user interface challenges</i>. Themes were mapped to the implementation strategies as identified by the implementation team. Eight total implementation strategies were used to address these technology barriers: (1) assess for readiness and identify barriers and facilitators, (2) obtain and use patients/consumers and family/caregiver feedback, (3) involve patients/consumers and family members/caregivers, (4) access new funding, (5) change physical structure and equipment, (6) centralize technical assistance, (7) prepare patients/consumers to be active participants, and (8) intervene with patients/consumers to enhance uptake and adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Technology-related barriers may limit the uptake of RSM by patients. Addressing these barriers through multimodel assessment and intervention strategies is crucial to ensuring successful implementation of RSM in real-world settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51626,"journal":{"name":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","volume":"9 ","pages":"e2400232"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12184978/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Perspectives on Technological Barriers and Implementation Strategies Leveraged During a Real-World Remote Symptom Monitoring Program.\",\"authors\":\"Tanvi V Padalkar, Nicole L Henderson, D'Ambra N Dent, Emma Hendrix, Catherine Smith, Chao-Hui Sylvia Huang, Tara Kaufmann, Chelsea McGowan, Jennifer Young Pierce, Stacey A Ingram, Angela M Stover, Ethan M Basch, Doris Howell, Bryan J Weiner, J Nicholas Odom, Gabrielle B Rocque\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/CCI-24-00232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Remote symptom monitoring (RSM) using electronic patient-reported outcomes leverages digital technologies to gather real-time information on patient experiences for symptom management. This study reports a formative evaluation of technology-related barriers encountered by patients participating in RSM and implementation strategies used to address those barriers in real-world, large-scale RSM implementations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Purposive sampling was conducted to recruit patients diagnosed with cancer and participating in RSM at the University of Alabama at Birmingham and USA Health Mitchell Cancer Institute for semi-structured interviews. Interviews were coded to identify technology-related barriers using a constant comparative method. Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change list was used to address the barriers to optimize RSM implementation. Barrier-associated themes from the interviews were mapped to implementation strategies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty participants age 24-77 years, half of whom were 60 years or older, were interviewed from December 2021 to February 2024. Three barrier themes relevant to technology utilization in RSM were identified: (1) <i>accessibility concerns</i>, (2) <i>digital health literacy</i>, and (3) <i>user interface challenges</i>. Themes were mapped to the implementation strategies as identified by the implementation team. Eight total implementation strategies were used to address these technology barriers: (1) assess for readiness and identify barriers and facilitators, (2) obtain and use patients/consumers and family/caregiver feedback, (3) involve patients/consumers and family members/caregivers, (4) access new funding, (5) change physical structure and equipment, (6) centralize technical assistance, (7) prepare patients/consumers to be active participants, and (8) intervene with patients/consumers to enhance uptake and adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Technology-related barriers may limit the uptake of RSM by patients. Addressing these barriers through multimodel assessment and intervention strategies is crucial to ensuring successful implementation of RSM in real-world settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"e2400232\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12184978/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI-24-00232\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI-24-00232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:使用电子患者报告结果的远程症状监测(RSM)利用数字技术收集患者体验的实时信息以进行症状管理。本研究报告了对参与RSM的患者遇到的技术相关障碍的形成性评估,以及用于解决现实世界中大规模RSM实施中这些障碍的实施策略。方法:采用有目的抽样的方法,对阿拉巴马大学伯明翰分校和美国健康米切尔癌症研究所诊断为癌症并参加RSM的患者进行半结构化访谈。对访谈进行编码,以使用恒定的比较方法确定与技术相关的障碍。实施变更的专家建议列表用于解决优化RSM实施的障碍。访谈中与障碍有关的主题被映射到执行战略中。结果:从2021年12月到2024年2月,40名年龄在24-77岁之间的参与者接受了采访,其中一半年龄在60岁或以上。确定了与RSM中技术利用相关的三个障碍主题:(1)可访问性问题,(2)数字健康素养,以及(3)用户界面挑战。主题被映射到实施小组确定的实施战略。总共使用了八项实施战略来解决这些技术障碍:(1)评估准备情况并识别障碍和促进因素,(2)获取和使用患者/消费者和家庭/照顾者的反馈,(3)让患者/消费者和家庭成员/照顾者参与,(4)获得新的资金,(5)改变物理结构和设备,(6)集中技术援助,(7)让患者/消费者成为积极的参与者,(8)干预患者/消费者以增强吸收和依从性。结论:与技术相关的障碍可能会限制患者对RSM的吸收。通过多模式评估和干预策略解决这些障碍对于确保在现实环境中成功实施RSM至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient Perspectives on Technological Barriers and Implementation Strategies Leveraged During a Real-World Remote Symptom Monitoring Program.

Purpose: Remote symptom monitoring (RSM) using electronic patient-reported outcomes leverages digital technologies to gather real-time information on patient experiences for symptom management. This study reports a formative evaluation of technology-related barriers encountered by patients participating in RSM and implementation strategies used to address those barriers in real-world, large-scale RSM implementations.

Methods: Purposive sampling was conducted to recruit patients diagnosed with cancer and participating in RSM at the University of Alabama at Birmingham and USA Health Mitchell Cancer Institute for semi-structured interviews. Interviews were coded to identify technology-related barriers using a constant comparative method. Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change list was used to address the barriers to optimize RSM implementation. Barrier-associated themes from the interviews were mapped to implementation strategies.

Results: Forty participants age 24-77 years, half of whom were 60 years or older, were interviewed from December 2021 to February 2024. Three barrier themes relevant to technology utilization in RSM were identified: (1) accessibility concerns, (2) digital health literacy, and (3) user interface challenges. Themes were mapped to the implementation strategies as identified by the implementation team. Eight total implementation strategies were used to address these technology barriers: (1) assess for readiness and identify barriers and facilitators, (2) obtain and use patients/consumers and family/caregiver feedback, (3) involve patients/consumers and family members/caregivers, (4) access new funding, (5) change physical structure and equipment, (6) centralize technical assistance, (7) prepare patients/consumers to be active participants, and (8) intervene with patients/consumers to enhance uptake and adherence.

Conclusion: Technology-related barriers may limit the uptake of RSM by patients. Addressing these barriers through multimodel assessment and intervention strategies is crucial to ensuring successful implementation of RSM in real-world settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
190
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信