{"title":"综述:反刍动物科学中的关键问题1 .反刍动物采食量控制。","authors":"W Pittroff, M M Kothmann","doi":"10.1016/j.animal.2025.101553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 1999, we were invited to review the literature on feed intake control in ruminants for the V<sup>th</sup> International Symposium on the Nutrition of Herbivores (Pittroff and Kothmann, 1999). Our key findings were: (1) the dominating bi-phasic intake control model, with physical intake control at low DM digestibilities changing to metabolic control at higher DM digestibilities, is not supported by experimental evidence; (2) although main substrates in energy metabolism differ between ruminants and monogastrics, principal intake control mechanisms appear to be the same; (3) the most likely central intake control element is ATP generation in the liver; (4) peripheral anabolic and catabolic processes, which change fuel supply to the liver, produce predictable adjustments in feed intake: (5) tissue-available N for synthesis plays a pivotal role in the dynamics of nutrient allocation and therefore in fuel storage, and fuel oxidation in the liver and periphery. From these findings, it follows that multiple interactions between feed components, and between feed components and animal characteristics determine feed quality in the ruminant. Consequently, static factorial feed requirement systems cannot optimise the match between feed supply and animal requirements. We were asked again to review the literature on feed intake control for the 11th ISNH and conclude, 25 years later, that important new experimental evidence supports our original conclusions and hypotheses. However, although key elements of our new theoretical concept were taken up by other authors (albeit unreferenced), corresponding new developments in feed requirement prediction models did not occur and consequently, major progress in optimising feed resource utilisation in ruminant production is absent. We discuss the reasons and future research directions, including a brief critical review of 'big data' proposals for the optimisation of ruminant nutritional management.</p>","PeriodicalId":50789,"journal":{"name":"Animal","volume":" ","pages":"101553"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review: Keystone issues in ruminant science I. Feed intake control in ruminants.\",\"authors\":\"W Pittroff, M M Kothmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.animal.2025.101553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In 1999, we were invited to review the literature on feed intake control in ruminants for the V<sup>th</sup> International Symposium on the Nutrition of Herbivores (Pittroff and Kothmann, 1999). Our key findings were: (1) the dominating bi-phasic intake control model, with physical intake control at low DM digestibilities changing to metabolic control at higher DM digestibilities, is not supported by experimental evidence; (2) although main substrates in energy metabolism differ between ruminants and monogastrics, principal intake control mechanisms appear to be the same; (3) the most likely central intake control element is ATP generation in the liver; (4) peripheral anabolic and catabolic processes, which change fuel supply to the liver, produce predictable adjustments in feed intake: (5) tissue-available N for synthesis plays a pivotal role in the dynamics of nutrient allocation and therefore in fuel storage, and fuel oxidation in the liver and periphery. From these findings, it follows that multiple interactions between feed components, and between feed components and animal characteristics determine feed quality in the ruminant. Consequently, static factorial feed requirement systems cannot optimise the match between feed supply and animal requirements. We were asked again to review the literature on feed intake control for the 11th ISNH and conclude, 25 years later, that important new experimental evidence supports our original conclusions and hypotheses. However, although key elements of our new theoretical concept were taken up by other authors (albeit unreferenced), corresponding new developments in feed requirement prediction models did not occur and consequently, major progress in optimising feed resource utilisation in ruminant production is absent. We discuss the reasons and future research directions, including a brief critical review of 'big data' proposals for the optimisation of ruminant nutritional management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101553\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2025.101553\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2025.101553","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
1999年,我们受邀为第五届国际草食动物营养研讨会(Pittroff and Kothmann, 1999)综述反刍动物采食量控制的文献。我们的主要发现是:(1)主导的双相摄入控制模型,即低干物质消化率时的身体摄入控制转变为高干物质消化率时的代谢控制,没有实验证据支持;(2)虽然反刍动物和单目动物能量代谢的主要底物不同,但主要的摄入控制机制似乎是相同的;(3)最可能的中央摄入控制因素是肝脏中ATP的生成;(4)外周合成代谢和分解代谢过程,改变肝脏的燃料供应,产生可预测的采食量调整;(5)用于合成的组织可利用氮在营养分配动态中起关键作用,因此在肝脏和外周的燃料储存和燃料氧化中起关键作用。由此可见,饲料成分之间以及饲料成分与动物特性之间的多重相互作用决定了反刍动物的饲料质量。因此,静态因子饲料需求系统无法优化饲料供应和动物需求之间的匹配。我们再次被要求回顾第11届ISNH采食量控制的文献,并在25年后得出结论,重要的新实验证据支持了我们最初的结论和假设。然而,尽管我们的新理论概念的关键要素被其他作者(尽管未被引用)所采用,但饲料需求预测模型的相应新发展并未出现,因此,在优化反刍动物生产中饲料资源利用方面缺乏重大进展。我们讨论了原因和未来的研究方向,包括对优化反刍动物营养管理的“大数据”建议进行简要的批判性回顾。
Review: Keystone issues in ruminant science I. Feed intake control in ruminants.
In 1999, we were invited to review the literature on feed intake control in ruminants for the Vth International Symposium on the Nutrition of Herbivores (Pittroff and Kothmann, 1999). Our key findings were: (1) the dominating bi-phasic intake control model, with physical intake control at low DM digestibilities changing to metabolic control at higher DM digestibilities, is not supported by experimental evidence; (2) although main substrates in energy metabolism differ between ruminants and monogastrics, principal intake control mechanisms appear to be the same; (3) the most likely central intake control element is ATP generation in the liver; (4) peripheral anabolic and catabolic processes, which change fuel supply to the liver, produce predictable adjustments in feed intake: (5) tissue-available N for synthesis plays a pivotal role in the dynamics of nutrient allocation and therefore in fuel storage, and fuel oxidation in the liver and periphery. From these findings, it follows that multiple interactions between feed components, and between feed components and animal characteristics determine feed quality in the ruminant. Consequently, static factorial feed requirement systems cannot optimise the match between feed supply and animal requirements. We were asked again to review the literature on feed intake control for the 11th ISNH and conclude, 25 years later, that important new experimental evidence supports our original conclusions and hypotheses. However, although key elements of our new theoretical concept were taken up by other authors (albeit unreferenced), corresponding new developments in feed requirement prediction models did not occur and consequently, major progress in optimising feed resource utilisation in ruminant production is absent. We discuss the reasons and future research directions, including a brief critical review of 'big data' proposals for the optimisation of ruminant nutritional management.
期刊介绍:
Editorial board
animal attracts the best research in animal biology and animal systems from across the spectrum of the agricultural, biomedical, and environmental sciences. It is the central element in an exciting collaboration between the British Society of Animal Science (BSAS), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) and the European Federation of Animal Science (EAAP) and represents a merging of three scientific journals: Animal Science; Animal Research; Reproduction, Nutrition, Development. animal publishes original cutting-edge research, ''hot'' topics and horizon-scanning reviews on animal-related aspects of the life sciences at the molecular, cellular, organ, whole animal and production system levels. The main subject areas include: breeding and genetics; nutrition; physiology and functional biology of systems; behaviour, health and welfare; farming systems, environmental impact and climate change; product quality, human health and well-being. Animal models and papers dealing with the integration of research between these topics and their impact on the environment and people are particularly welcome.