Astrid Karina Valås Harring, Maria Kjærgaard, Tine Bennedsen Gehrt
{"title":"频繁呼叫者与频繁使用者——对紧急医疗服务频繁联系人的范围审查。","authors":"Astrid Karina Valås Harring, Maria Kjærgaard, Tine Bennedsen Gehrt","doi":"10.1186/s12245-025-00925-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A significant limitation in the literature on frequent callers and frequent users of prehospital Emergency Medical Services (EMS) is the lack of consistent and thus, comparable definitions, as well as inconsistent use of terminology. Here we aim to summarise and address discrepancies in the existing literature, contributing to the ongoing discussion.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of available literature from 2000 up until February 2024 in the PubMed database. Search terms related to both frequent callers and frequent users of the prehospital EMS.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 19 articles were included in our analysis of definitions of frequent callers and users of prehospital EMS. The average minimum number of calls required to be defined as a frequent caller was 42.5 calls per year (range: 4-120). For frequent users, an average minimum number of ambulance responses was 4.7 per year (range: 3-10).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings emphasise both the possibility and the need to distinguish between frequent users and frequent callers of prehospital EMS. Existing definitions in the literature vary widely, making comparisons difficult. Standardised definitions and consistent terminology are essential to address underlying issues and enable further research synthesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"18 1","pages":"108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12180229/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequent callers vs. frequent users - a scoping review of frequent contacts to the emergency medical services.\",\"authors\":\"Astrid Karina Valås Harring, Maria Kjærgaard, Tine Bennedsen Gehrt\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12245-025-00925-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A significant limitation in the literature on frequent callers and frequent users of prehospital Emergency Medical Services (EMS) is the lack of consistent and thus, comparable definitions, as well as inconsistent use of terminology. Here we aim to summarise and address discrepancies in the existing literature, contributing to the ongoing discussion.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of available literature from 2000 up until February 2024 in the PubMed database. Search terms related to both frequent callers and frequent users of the prehospital EMS.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 19 articles were included in our analysis of definitions of frequent callers and users of prehospital EMS. The average minimum number of calls required to be defined as a frequent caller was 42.5 calls per year (range: 4-120). For frequent users, an average minimum number of ambulance responses was 4.7 per year (range: 3-10).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings emphasise both the possibility and the need to distinguish between frequent users and frequent callers of prehospital EMS. Existing definitions in the literature vary widely, making comparisons difficult. Standardised definitions and consistent terminology are essential to address underlying issues and enable further research synthesis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12180229/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-025-00925-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-025-00925-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Frequent callers vs. frequent users - a scoping review of frequent contacts to the emergency medical services.
Background: A significant limitation in the literature on frequent callers and frequent users of prehospital Emergency Medical Services (EMS) is the lack of consistent and thus, comparable definitions, as well as inconsistent use of terminology. Here we aim to summarise and address discrepancies in the existing literature, contributing to the ongoing discussion.
Method: We conducted a systematic search of available literature from 2000 up until February 2024 in the PubMed database. Search terms related to both frequent callers and frequent users of the prehospital EMS.
Result: A total of 19 articles were included in our analysis of definitions of frequent callers and users of prehospital EMS. The average minimum number of calls required to be defined as a frequent caller was 42.5 calls per year (range: 4-120). For frequent users, an average minimum number of ambulance responses was 4.7 per year (range: 3-10).
Conclusion: Our findings emphasise both the possibility and the need to distinguish between frequent users and frequent callers of prehospital EMS. Existing definitions in the literature vary widely, making comparisons difficult. Standardised definitions and consistent terminology are essential to address underlying issues and enable further research synthesis.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the journal is to bring to light the various clinical advancements and research developments attained over the world and thus help the specialty forge ahead. It is directed towards physicians and medical personnel undergoing training or working within the field of Emergency Medicine. Medical students who are interested in pursuing a career in Emergency Medicine will also benefit from the journal. This is particularly useful for trainees in countries where the specialty is still in its infancy. Disciplines covered will include interesting clinical cases, the latest evidence-based practice and research developments in Emergency medicine including emergency pediatrics.