在资源有限的加沙队列中,胸部CT对COVID-19肺炎的诊断准确性:一项252例患者的回顾性研究

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Husam H Mansour, Noor Khairiah A Karim, Noor Diyana Osman, Rohayu Hami, Yasser S Alajerami
{"title":"在资源有限的加沙队列中,胸部CT对COVID-19肺炎的诊断准确性:一项252例患者的回顾性研究","authors":"Husam H Mansour, Noor Khairiah A Karim, Noor Diyana Osman, Rohayu Hami, Yasser S Alajerami","doi":"10.1007/s10140-025-02359-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of chest CT for COVID-19 pneumonia in resource-limited Gaza. It compared CT performance to RT-PCR and examined how CT severity scores and interobserver agreement influence diagnostic accuracy, reproducibility, and clinical utility for early detection and triage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on 252 consecutive patients diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia between September 2020 and June 2021 at three major governmental hospitals across the Gaza Strip. Chest CT scans were compared to RT-PCR as the gold standard for diagnosis. CT severity scores were calculated using a 25-point system, and interobserver agreement was assessed using kappa statistics. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated for various threshold levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 252 patients included in the study, the mean age was 56.81 ± 11.34 years, with 113 males and 139 females. The diagnostic sensitivity of chest CT was 91.4%, with a specificity of 76.4%. The highest accuracy was observed with a severity score threshold of ≥ 15, with a Youden index of 0.630. Interobserver agreement was excellent (kappa = 0.87) for ground-glass opacities and consolidation. The NPV was 71.2%, indicating the need for supplementary RT-PCR testing in low-prevalence cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Chest CT is a reliable diagnostic adjunct for COVID-19 pneumonia, especially in Gaza's severely resource-limited setting, where CT was more accessible than RT-PCR. A CT severity score threshold of ≥ 15 offers an optimal balance of sensitivity and specificity. These findings highlight the practical role of CT imaging in pandemic response in resource-constrained environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic accuracy of chest CT for COVID-19 pneumonia in a resource-limited Gaza cohort: a retrospective study of 252 patients.\",\"authors\":\"Husam H Mansour, Noor Khairiah A Karim, Noor Diyana Osman, Rohayu Hami, Yasser S Alajerami\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10140-025-02359-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of chest CT for COVID-19 pneumonia in resource-limited Gaza. It compared CT performance to RT-PCR and examined how CT severity scores and interobserver agreement influence diagnostic accuracy, reproducibility, and clinical utility for early detection and triage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on 252 consecutive patients diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia between September 2020 and June 2021 at three major governmental hospitals across the Gaza Strip. Chest CT scans were compared to RT-PCR as the gold standard for diagnosis. CT severity scores were calculated using a 25-point system, and interobserver agreement was assessed using kappa statistics. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated for various threshold levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 252 patients included in the study, the mean age was 56.81 ± 11.34 years, with 113 males and 139 females. The diagnostic sensitivity of chest CT was 91.4%, with a specificity of 76.4%. The highest accuracy was observed with a severity score threshold of ≥ 15, with a Youden index of 0.630. Interobserver agreement was excellent (kappa = 0.87) for ground-glass opacities and consolidation. The NPV was 71.2%, indicating the need for supplementary RT-PCR testing in low-prevalence cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Chest CT is a reliable diagnostic adjunct for COVID-19 pneumonia, especially in Gaza's severely resource-limited setting, where CT was more accessible than RT-PCR. A CT severity score threshold of ≥ 15 offers an optimal balance of sensitivity and specificity. These findings highlight the practical role of CT imaging in pandemic response in resource-constrained environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-025-02359-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-025-02359-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价资源有限的加沙地区胸部CT对COVID-19肺炎的诊断准确性。它比较了CT表现与RT-PCR,并检查了CT严重程度评分和观察者间的一致性如何影响诊断准确性、可重复性以及早期检测和分诊的临床效用。方法:对2020年9月至2021年6月期间在加沙地带三家主要政府医院连续诊断为COVID-19肺炎的252例患者进行回顾性分析。将胸部CT扫描与RT-PCR作为诊断的金标准进行比较。采用25分制计算CT严重程度评分,采用kappa统计评估观察者间的一致性。对不同阈值水平计算敏感性、特异性和预测值。结果:纳入研究的252例患者平均年龄56.81±11.34岁,其中男性113例,女性139例。胸部CT诊断敏感性为91.4%,特异性为76.4%。严重度评分阈值≥15时准确率最高,约登指数为0.630。观察者间对于毛玻璃混浊和实变的一致性非常好(kappa = 0.87)。NPV为71.2%,表明在低流行病例中需要补充RT-PCR检测。结论:胸部CT是COVID-19肺炎的可靠诊断辅助手段,特别是在加沙严重资源有限的环境中,CT比RT-PCR更容易获得。CT严重性评分阈值≥15提供了敏感性和特异性的最佳平衡。这些发现突出了CT成像在资源受限环境中应对大流行的实际作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic accuracy of chest CT for COVID-19 pneumonia in a resource-limited Gaza cohort: a retrospective study of 252 patients.

Purpose: The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of chest CT for COVID-19 pneumonia in resource-limited Gaza. It compared CT performance to RT-PCR and examined how CT severity scores and interobserver agreement influence diagnostic accuracy, reproducibility, and clinical utility for early detection and triage.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 252 consecutive patients diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia between September 2020 and June 2021 at three major governmental hospitals across the Gaza Strip. Chest CT scans were compared to RT-PCR as the gold standard for diagnosis. CT severity scores were calculated using a 25-point system, and interobserver agreement was assessed using kappa statistics. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated for various threshold levels.

Results: Among the 252 patients included in the study, the mean age was 56.81 ± 11.34 years, with 113 males and 139 females. The diagnostic sensitivity of chest CT was 91.4%, with a specificity of 76.4%. The highest accuracy was observed with a severity score threshold of ≥ 15, with a Youden index of 0.630. Interobserver agreement was excellent (kappa = 0.87) for ground-glass opacities and consolidation. The NPV was 71.2%, indicating the need for supplementary RT-PCR testing in low-prevalence cases.

Conclusion: Chest CT is a reliable diagnostic adjunct for COVID-19 pneumonia, especially in Gaza's severely resource-limited setting, where CT was more accessible than RT-PCR. A CT severity score threshold of ≥ 15 offers an optimal balance of sensitivity and specificity. These findings highlight the practical role of CT imaging in pandemic response in resource-constrained environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Radiology
Emergency Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: To advance and improve the radiologic aspects of emergency careTo establish Emergency Radiology as an area of special interest in the field of diagnostic imagingTo improve methods of education in Emergency RadiologyTo provide, through formal meetings, a mechanism for presentation of scientific papers on various aspects of Emergency Radiology and continuing educationTo promote research in Emergency Radiology by clinical and basic science investigators, including residents and other traineesTo act as the resource body on Emergency Radiology for those interested in emergency patient care Members of the American Society of Emergency Radiology (ASER) receive the Emergency Radiology journal as a benefit of membership!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信