DICOM®标准的神经生理学信号编解码器:初步结果。

Filippo Battaglia, Mattia Galanti, Giovanni Gugliandolo, Stefan Rampp, Jan Remi, Alexandra Parashos, Sonali Sharma, Sonal Bhatia, Brian C Dean, Ekrem Kutluay, Zeke Campbell, Sarah Schmitt, Nicola Donato, Jonathan J Halford, Giuseppe Campobello
{"title":"DICOM®标准的神经生理学信号编解码器:初步结果。","authors":"Filippo Battaglia, Mattia Galanti, Giovanni Gugliandolo, Stefan Rampp, Jan Remi, Alexandra Parashos, Sonali Sharma, Sonal Bhatia, Brian C Dean, Ekrem Kutluay, Zeke Campbell, Sarah Schmitt, Nicola Donato, Jonathan J Halford, Giuseppe Campobello","doi":"10.1109/memea60663.2024.10596834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this paper we report experimental results on compression of neurophysiology signals obtained as part of the standardization activities conducted by the Working Group 32 (WG-32) of the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM). WG-32 focuses on extending the DICOM<sup>®</sup> standard for clinical neurophysiology data exchange. With this aim, several compression techniques specifically devised for neurophysiology signals, as well as audio codecs, have been investigated and compared using real-world datasets. Moreover, a web-based application, named EEGnet and developed specifically for viewing and annotating electroencephalography (EEG) data, has been exploited for determining the maximum distortion that can be tolerated on neurophysiology signals. Through the EEGnet framework, eight neurologists, affiliated to different universities and medical centers, identified signals where they observed a clinically-significant difference. As one of the main results of our study, we found that, in the case of EEG signals, a percentage root mean square difference (PRD) of 5% can be accepted by clinicians and experts. On the other hand, all experts agreed that distortion is unacceptable when the PRD is greater than 15%. Finally, surprisingly enough, experimental results showed that audio codecs provide performance levels that, in some cases, are comparable to those of state-of-the-art algorithms specifically devised for compression of EEG signals.</p>","PeriodicalId":520902,"journal":{"name":"... IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications : proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications","volume":"2024 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178048/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neurophysiology Signal Codecs for the DICOM<sup>®</sup> Standard: Preliminary Results.\",\"authors\":\"Filippo Battaglia, Mattia Galanti, Giovanni Gugliandolo, Stefan Rampp, Jan Remi, Alexandra Parashos, Sonali Sharma, Sonal Bhatia, Brian C Dean, Ekrem Kutluay, Zeke Campbell, Sarah Schmitt, Nicola Donato, Jonathan J Halford, Giuseppe Campobello\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/memea60663.2024.10596834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this paper we report experimental results on compression of neurophysiology signals obtained as part of the standardization activities conducted by the Working Group 32 (WG-32) of the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM). WG-32 focuses on extending the DICOM<sup>®</sup> standard for clinical neurophysiology data exchange. With this aim, several compression techniques specifically devised for neurophysiology signals, as well as audio codecs, have been investigated and compared using real-world datasets. Moreover, a web-based application, named EEGnet and developed specifically for viewing and annotating electroencephalography (EEG) data, has been exploited for determining the maximum distortion that can be tolerated on neurophysiology signals. Through the EEGnet framework, eight neurologists, affiliated to different universities and medical centers, identified signals where they observed a clinically-significant difference. As one of the main results of our study, we found that, in the case of EEG signals, a percentage root mean square difference (PRD) of 5% can be accepted by clinicians and experts. On the other hand, all experts agreed that distortion is unacceptable when the PRD is greater than 15%. Finally, surprisingly enough, experimental results showed that audio codecs provide performance levels that, in some cases, are comparable to those of state-of-the-art algorithms specifically devised for compression of EEG signals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"... IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications : proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications\",\"volume\":\"2024 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178048/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"... IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications : proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/memea60663.2024.10596834\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"... IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications : proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/memea60663.2024.10596834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们报告了神经生理学信号压缩的实验结果,这些信号是由医学数字成像和通信(DICOM)第32工作组(WG-32)进行的标准化活动的一部分。WG-32专注于扩展临床神经生理学数据交换的DICOM®标准。为此,研究人员研究了几种专门为神经生理学信号和音频编解码器设计的压缩技术,并使用现实世界的数据集进行了比较。此外,一个名为EEGnet的基于网络的应用程序,专门用于查看和注释脑电图(EEG)数据,已被用于确定神经生理学信号可以容忍的最大失真。通过EEGnet框架,隶属于不同大学和医学中心的八名神经学家识别出了他们观察到的具有临床意义的差异的信号。作为我们研究的主要结果之一,我们发现,在脑电图信号的情况下,5%的百分比均方根差(PRD)可以被临床医生和专家接受。另一方面,所有专家都同意,当珠三角占比超过15%时,扭曲是不可接受的。最后,令人惊讶的是,实验结果表明,在某些情况下,音频编解码器提供的性能水平可与专门为脑电图信号压缩设计的最先进算法相媲美。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neurophysiology Signal Codecs for the DICOM® Standard: Preliminary Results.

In this paper we report experimental results on compression of neurophysiology signals obtained as part of the standardization activities conducted by the Working Group 32 (WG-32) of the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM). WG-32 focuses on extending the DICOM® standard for clinical neurophysiology data exchange. With this aim, several compression techniques specifically devised for neurophysiology signals, as well as audio codecs, have been investigated and compared using real-world datasets. Moreover, a web-based application, named EEGnet and developed specifically for viewing and annotating electroencephalography (EEG) data, has been exploited for determining the maximum distortion that can be tolerated on neurophysiology signals. Through the EEGnet framework, eight neurologists, affiliated to different universities and medical centers, identified signals where they observed a clinically-significant difference. As one of the main results of our study, we found that, in the case of EEG signals, a percentage root mean square difference (PRD) of 5% can be accepted by clinicians and experts. On the other hand, all experts agreed that distortion is unacceptable when the PRD is greater than 15%. Finally, surprisingly enough, experimental results showed that audio codecs provide performance levels that, in some cases, are comparable to those of state-of-the-art algorithms specifically devised for compression of EEG signals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信