肩袖触发点干针对肩痛患者上肢稳定性和功能的影响:随机临床试验研究。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Samira Ghasemi, Leila Abbasi, Narges Meftahi, Mohammad Amiri
{"title":"肩袖触发点干针对肩痛患者上肢稳定性和功能的影响:随机临床试验研究。","authors":"Samira Ghasemi, Leila Abbasi, Narges Meftahi, Mohammad Amiri","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2025.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shoulder pain, a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder (lifetime prevalence: 6.7%-66.7%), is closely linked to rotator cuff dysfunction. While trigger points in these muscles are common in symptomatic individuals, their impact on shoulder stability and function remains poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This randomized controlled trial examined whether dry needling of rotator cuff trigger points, compared with sham needling, improves pain, disability, shoulder stability, and functional outcomes in patients with chronic rotator cuff--related shoulder pain.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 44 patients aged 18-45years with shoulder pain randomly assigned to two groups. The first group received deep dry needling on trigger points, while the second group received sham dry needling. The treatment was performed over three sessions. Shoulder stability (Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test), pain (Visual Analog Scale), disability (Quick version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire), grip strength, and strength of internal and external shoulder rotators were measured at the baseline, at the end of the last session, and 1week after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dry needling significantly improved shoulder stability (MD=0.11, 95% CI=0.06-0.16), grip strength (MD=12.4 kg), and pain (MD=-35.6, 95% CI=-41.2 to -30.0) compared with sham needling (p<0.05). All improvements exceeded minimal clinically important differences. At 1-week follow-up, all outcomes favored dry needling with large effect sizes (d=1.09-2.16), exceeding Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Quick version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (Δ=15.9) and Visual Analog Scale (Δ=9.9). Time-group interactions confirmed sustained improvements in the treatment group (p<0.001). Post-treatment improvements in shoulder stability (Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test) were consistent across sexes, with no significant sex-by-group interactions (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Deep dry needling of rotator cuff trigger points significantly improves shoulder function, stability, pain, and disability in patients with chronic shoulder pain. Clinicians should consider integrating this intervention into rehabilitation protocols for rotator cuff--related disorders, as it demonstrates clinically meaningful outcomes surpassing minimal important differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of rotator cuff trigger points dry needling on the stability and function of the upper limb in people with shoulder pain: Randomized clinical trial study.\",\"authors\":\"Samira Ghasemi, Leila Abbasi, Narges Meftahi, Mohammad Amiri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jht.2025.04.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shoulder pain, a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder (lifetime prevalence: 6.7%-66.7%), is closely linked to rotator cuff dysfunction. While trigger points in these muscles are common in symptomatic individuals, their impact on shoulder stability and function remains poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This randomized controlled trial examined whether dry needling of rotator cuff trigger points, compared with sham needling, improves pain, disability, shoulder stability, and functional outcomes in patients with chronic rotator cuff--related shoulder pain.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 44 patients aged 18-45years with shoulder pain randomly assigned to two groups. The first group received deep dry needling on trigger points, while the second group received sham dry needling. The treatment was performed over three sessions. Shoulder stability (Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test), pain (Visual Analog Scale), disability (Quick version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire), grip strength, and strength of internal and external shoulder rotators were measured at the baseline, at the end of the last session, and 1week after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dry needling significantly improved shoulder stability (MD=0.11, 95% CI=0.06-0.16), grip strength (MD=12.4 kg), and pain (MD=-35.6, 95% CI=-41.2 to -30.0) compared with sham needling (p<0.05). All improvements exceeded minimal clinically important differences. At 1-week follow-up, all outcomes favored dry needling with large effect sizes (d=1.09-2.16), exceeding Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Quick version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (Δ=15.9) and Visual Analog Scale (Δ=9.9). Time-group interactions confirmed sustained improvements in the treatment group (p<0.001). Post-treatment improvements in shoulder stability (Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test) were consistent across sexes, with no significant sex-by-group interactions (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Deep dry needling of rotator cuff trigger points significantly improves shoulder function, stability, pain, and disability in patients with chronic shoulder pain. Clinicians should consider integrating this intervention into rehabilitation protocols for rotator cuff--related disorders, as it demonstrates clinically meaningful outcomes surpassing minimal important differences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2025.04.005\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2025.04.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肩痛是一种常见的肌肉骨骼疾病(终生患病率:6.7%-66.7%),与肩袖功能障碍密切相关。虽然这些肌肉的触发点在有症状的个体中很常见,但它们对肩部稳定性和功能的影响仍然知之甚少。目的:这项随机对照试验研究了干针刺肩袖触发点与假针刺相比,是否能改善慢性肩袖相关肩痛患者的疼痛、残疾、肩部稳定性和功能结局。研究设计:随机对照试验。方法:将44例18 ~ 45岁肩痛患者随机分为两组。第一组在触发点处深干针刺,第二组在触发点处假干针刺。治疗分三个阶段进行。肩稳定性(上肢闭合动力链稳定性测试)、疼痛(视觉模拟量表)、失能(手臂、肩膀和手的失能问卷快速版)、握力和内外肩旋转器的力量在基线、最后一次训练结束时和干预后1周进行测量。结果:与假针相比,干针可显著改善肩部稳定性(MD=0.11, 95% CI=0.06 ~ 0.16)、握力(MD=12.4 kg)和疼痛(MD=-35.6, 95% CI=-41.2 ~ -30.0) (p0.05)。结论:肩袖触发点深干针刺可显著改善慢性肩痛患者的肩功能、稳定性、疼痛和残疾。临床医生应考虑将这种干预纳入肩袖相关疾病的康复方案,因为它证明了具有临床意义的结果超过了最小的重要差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of rotator cuff trigger points dry needling on the stability and function of the upper limb in people with shoulder pain: Randomized clinical trial study.

Background: Shoulder pain, a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder (lifetime prevalence: 6.7%-66.7%), is closely linked to rotator cuff dysfunction. While trigger points in these muscles are common in symptomatic individuals, their impact on shoulder stability and function remains poorly understood.

Purpose: This randomized controlled trial examined whether dry needling of rotator cuff trigger points, compared with sham needling, improves pain, disability, shoulder stability, and functional outcomes in patients with chronic rotator cuff--related shoulder pain.

Study design: Randomized controlled trial.

Methods: In total, 44 patients aged 18-45years with shoulder pain randomly assigned to two groups. The first group received deep dry needling on trigger points, while the second group received sham dry needling. The treatment was performed over three sessions. Shoulder stability (Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test), pain (Visual Analog Scale), disability (Quick version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire), grip strength, and strength of internal and external shoulder rotators were measured at the baseline, at the end of the last session, and 1week after the intervention.

Results: Dry needling significantly improved shoulder stability (MD=0.11, 95% CI=0.06-0.16), grip strength (MD=12.4 kg), and pain (MD=-35.6, 95% CI=-41.2 to -30.0) compared with sham needling (p<0.05). All improvements exceeded minimal clinically important differences. At 1-week follow-up, all outcomes favored dry needling with large effect sizes (d=1.09-2.16), exceeding Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Quick version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (Δ=15.9) and Visual Analog Scale (Δ=9.9). Time-group interactions confirmed sustained improvements in the treatment group (p<0.001). Post-treatment improvements in shoulder stability (Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test) were consistent across sexes, with no significant sex-by-group interactions (p>0.05).

Conclusions: Deep dry needling of rotator cuff trigger points significantly improves shoulder function, stability, pain, and disability in patients with chronic shoulder pain. Clinicians should consider integrating this intervention into rehabilitation protocols for rotator cuff--related disorders, as it demonstrates clinically meaningful outcomes surpassing minimal important differences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hand Therapy
Journal of Hand Therapy 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信