Sophie Le Fur, Iva Gueorguieva, Kevin Perge, Fatiha Guémazi, Nathalie Frament, Natacha Bouhours-Nouet, Berthe Razafimahefa, Pascale Trioche-Eberschweiler, Ramona Nicolescu, Patricia Pigeon-Kherchiche, Fabienne Dalla Vale, Claire Rodet, Alice Bonin, Nadège Bourvis, Pierre Bougnères
{"title":"焦点小组评估儿童和青少年1型糖尿病患者的治疗负担","authors":"Sophie Le Fur, Iva Gueorguieva, Kevin Perge, Fatiha Guémazi, Nathalie Frament, Natacha Bouhours-Nouet, Berthe Razafimahefa, Pascale Trioche-Eberschweiler, Ramona Nicolescu, Patricia Pigeon-Kherchiche, Fabienne Dalla Vale, Claire Rodet, Alice Bonin, Nadège Bourvis, Pierre Bougnères","doi":"10.1155/pedi/8833434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Taking into account the burden of treatment (BOT) should favor psychological fulfillment and adherence of young patients to treatment, which largely determines the quality of type 1 diabetes (T1D) control. To identify BOT components, the Ariane study carried out a focus group survey among 84 children and adolescents with T1D aged 12.6 ± 3.7 years. <b>Research Design and Methods:</b> Focus groups were organized in 10 pediatric diabetes centers, a qualitative research method that brings together a small group of patients to express their perception of treatment and answer questions in a moderated nonmedical setting. <b>Results:</b> A total of 3640 verbatim voicing children's concerns were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed by five working groups composed of pediatric diabetologists, specialized nurses, adults with childhood-onset T1D, and two groups from the civil society. Each group studied the verbatim separately to extract 24 main concerns summarizing BOT. These concerns fell into two distinct categories: concerns about physical, material, and care organization (<i>N</i> = 15) or psychological concerns (<i>N</i> = 9). A BOT score summed the number of concerns of each patient. The mean BOT score was 7.4 ± 3.3 (range 1-18). Gender had a prominent influence on concerns (<i>p</i>=0.002). <b>Conclusions:</b> The identification of common concerns expressed through focus groups provides a new tool for estimation of BOT in childhood T1D.</p>","PeriodicalId":19797,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Diabetes","volume":"2025 ","pages":"8833434"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Burden of Treatment in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Evaluated by Focus Groups.\",\"authors\":\"Sophie Le Fur, Iva Gueorguieva, Kevin Perge, Fatiha Guémazi, Nathalie Frament, Natacha Bouhours-Nouet, Berthe Razafimahefa, Pascale Trioche-Eberschweiler, Ramona Nicolescu, Patricia Pigeon-Kherchiche, Fabienne Dalla Vale, Claire Rodet, Alice Bonin, Nadège Bourvis, Pierre Bougnères\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/pedi/8833434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Taking into account the burden of treatment (BOT) should favor psychological fulfillment and adherence of young patients to treatment, which largely determines the quality of type 1 diabetes (T1D) control. To identify BOT components, the Ariane study carried out a focus group survey among 84 children and adolescents with T1D aged 12.6 ± 3.7 years. <b>Research Design and Methods:</b> Focus groups were organized in 10 pediatric diabetes centers, a qualitative research method that brings together a small group of patients to express their perception of treatment and answer questions in a moderated nonmedical setting. <b>Results:</b> A total of 3640 verbatim voicing children's concerns were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed by five working groups composed of pediatric diabetologists, specialized nurses, adults with childhood-onset T1D, and two groups from the civil society. Each group studied the verbatim separately to extract 24 main concerns summarizing BOT. These concerns fell into two distinct categories: concerns about physical, material, and care organization (<i>N</i> = 15) or psychological concerns (<i>N</i> = 9). A BOT score summed the number of concerns of each patient. The mean BOT score was 7.4 ± 3.3 (range 1-18). Gender had a prominent influence on concerns (<i>p</i>=0.002). <b>Conclusions:</b> The identification of common concerns expressed through focus groups provides a new tool for estimation of BOT in childhood T1D.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Diabetes\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"8833434\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178731/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/pedi/8833434\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/pedi/8833434","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Burden of Treatment in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Evaluated by Focus Groups.
Objective: Taking into account the burden of treatment (BOT) should favor psychological fulfillment and adherence of young patients to treatment, which largely determines the quality of type 1 diabetes (T1D) control. To identify BOT components, the Ariane study carried out a focus group survey among 84 children and adolescents with T1D aged 12.6 ± 3.7 years. Research Design and Methods: Focus groups were organized in 10 pediatric diabetes centers, a qualitative research method that brings together a small group of patients to express their perception of treatment and answer questions in a moderated nonmedical setting. Results: A total of 3640 verbatim voicing children's concerns were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed by five working groups composed of pediatric diabetologists, specialized nurses, adults with childhood-onset T1D, and two groups from the civil society. Each group studied the verbatim separately to extract 24 main concerns summarizing BOT. These concerns fell into two distinct categories: concerns about physical, material, and care organization (N = 15) or psychological concerns (N = 9). A BOT score summed the number of concerns of each patient. The mean BOT score was 7.4 ± 3.3 (range 1-18). Gender had a prominent influence on concerns (p=0.002). Conclusions: The identification of common concerns expressed through focus groups provides a new tool for estimation of BOT in childhood T1D.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Diabetes is a bi-monthly journal devoted to disseminating new knowledge relating to the epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, management, complications and prevention of diabetes in childhood and adolescence. The aim of the journal is to become the leading vehicle for international dissemination of research and practice relating to diabetes in youth. Papers are considered for publication based on the rigor of scientific approach, novelty, and importance for understanding mechanisms involved in the epidemiology and etiology of this disease, especially its molecular, biochemical and physiological aspects. Work relating to the clinical presentation, course, management and outcome of diabetes, including its physical and emotional sequelae, is considered. In vitro studies using animal or human tissues, whole animal and clinical studies in humans are also considered. The journal reviews full-length papers, preliminary communications with important new information, clinical reports, and reviews of major topics. Invited editorials, commentaries, and perspectives are a regular feature. The editors, based in the USA, Europe, and Australasia, maintain regular communications to assure rapid turnaround time of submitted manuscripts.