68Ga前列腺特异性膜抗原-11 (HBED-CC) PET/MRI用于前列腺癌生化复发的前列腺复发报告成像(PI-RR)系统的验证:一项初步研究。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Nuclear Medicine Communications Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-20 DOI:10.1097/MNM.0000000000002016
Lebriz Uslu-Beşli, Baris Turkbey, Bariş Bakir, Selahattin Durmaz, Çetin Demirdağ, Haluk Burçak Sayman
{"title":"68Ga前列腺特异性膜抗原-11 (HBED-CC) PET/MRI用于前列腺癌生化复发的前列腺复发报告成像(PI-RR)系统的验证:一项初步研究。","authors":"Lebriz Uslu-Beşli, Baris Turkbey, Bariş Bakir, Selahattin Durmaz, Çetin Demirdağ, Haluk Burçak Sayman","doi":"10.1097/MNM.0000000000002016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the diagnostic performance of Prostate Imaging for Recurrence Reporting (PI-RR) system using 68 Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 (HBED-CC) PET/MRI in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PET/MRI data of 31 PCa patients [17 with radical prostatectomy (RP) and 14 with radiotherapy (RT)] with BCR were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent PSMA PET/MRI and multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI). Images were evaluated using PI-RR system for mpMRI and the European Association of Nuclear Medicine standardized reporting guidelines (E-PSMA) for PET, with PI-RR and E-PSMA scores dichotomized as ≤2 negative and ≥3 positive for recurrence. Diagnostic performances were assessed using expert-based ground truth establishment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 64.7%, 85.7%, and 74.2%, respectively, for PET and 70.6%, 100%, and 83.9%, respectively, for PI-RR. While PI-RR did not reveal any false positive lesions, five patients with false negative PI-RR results were also negative with PET. In patients with RP, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 44.4%, 100%, and 70.6%, respectively, for PET and 55.6%, 100%, and 76.5%, respectively, for PI-RR. For patients with RT, these values were 87.5%, 66.7%, and 78.6%, respectively, for PET and 87.5%, 100%, and 92.9%, respectively, for PI-RR. There was no significant performance difference between PET or PI-RR in all patients ( P = 0.564), patients with RP ( P = 0.317), or RT ( P = 0.157).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>68 Ga PSMA PET evaluation with E-PSMA and mpMRI interpretation with PI-RR have similar diagnostic performance for detection of local recurrence after RP or RT in PCa.</p>","PeriodicalId":19708,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","volume":" ","pages":"895-904"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Prostate Imaging for Recurrence Reporting (PI-RR) System using 68 Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen-11 (HBED-CC) PET/MRI in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Lebriz Uslu-Beşli, Baris Turkbey, Bariş Bakir, Selahattin Durmaz, Çetin Demirdağ, Haluk Burçak Sayman\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MNM.0000000000002016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the diagnostic performance of Prostate Imaging for Recurrence Reporting (PI-RR) system using 68 Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 (HBED-CC) PET/MRI in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PET/MRI data of 31 PCa patients [17 with radical prostatectomy (RP) and 14 with radiotherapy (RT)] with BCR were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent PSMA PET/MRI and multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI). Images were evaluated using PI-RR system for mpMRI and the European Association of Nuclear Medicine standardized reporting guidelines (E-PSMA) for PET, with PI-RR and E-PSMA scores dichotomized as ≤2 negative and ≥3 positive for recurrence. Diagnostic performances were assessed using expert-based ground truth establishment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 64.7%, 85.7%, and 74.2%, respectively, for PET and 70.6%, 100%, and 83.9%, respectively, for PI-RR. While PI-RR did not reveal any false positive lesions, five patients with false negative PI-RR results were also negative with PET. In patients with RP, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 44.4%, 100%, and 70.6%, respectively, for PET and 55.6%, 100%, and 76.5%, respectively, for PI-RR. For patients with RT, these values were 87.5%, 66.7%, and 78.6%, respectively, for PET and 87.5%, 100%, and 92.9%, respectively, for PI-RR. There was no significant performance difference between PET or PI-RR in all patients ( P = 0.564), patients with RP ( P = 0.317), or RT ( P = 0.157).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>68 Ga PSMA PET evaluation with E-PSMA and mpMRI interpretation with PI-RR have similar diagnostic performance for detection of local recurrence after RP or RT in PCa.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Medicine Communications\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"895-904\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Medicine Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000002016\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000002016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨68Ga前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)-11 (HBED-CC) PET/MRI在前列腺癌(PCa)生化复发(BCR)患者中的诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析31例前列腺癌患者(根治性前列腺切除术(RP) 17例,放疗(RT) 14例)的PET/MRI资料。所有患者均接受PSMA PET/MRI和多参数前列腺MRI (mpMRI)检查。采用mpMRI的PI-RR系统和PET的欧洲核医学协会标准化报告指南(E-PSMA)对图像进行评估,PI-RR和E-PSMA评分分为复发≤2分阴性和≥3分阳性。使用基于专家的基础真值建立来评估诊断性能。结果:PET的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为64.7%、85.7%和74.2%,PI-RR的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为70.6%、100%和83.9%。虽然PI-RR未显示任何假阳性病变,但5例PI-RR假阴性患者的PET检测结果也为阴性。在RP患者中,PET的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为44.4%、100%和70.6%,PI-RR的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为55.6%、100%和76.5%。对于RT患者,这些值分别为87.5%、66.7%和78.6%,PET和PI-RR分别为87.5%、100%和92.9%。PET与PI-RR在所有患者(P = 0.564)、RP患者(P = 0.317)、RT患者(P = 0.157)中均无显著差异。结论:采用E-PSMA的68Ga PSMA PET评价与采用PI-RR的mpMRI解释对PCa RP或RT后局部复发的诊断性能相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of the Prostate Imaging for Recurrence Reporting (PI-RR) System using 68 Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen-11 (HBED-CC) PET/MRI in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a pilot study.

Objective: To assess the diagnostic performance of Prostate Imaging for Recurrence Reporting (PI-RR) system using 68 Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 (HBED-CC) PET/MRI in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR).

Methods: PET/MRI data of 31 PCa patients [17 with radical prostatectomy (RP) and 14 with radiotherapy (RT)] with BCR were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent PSMA PET/MRI and multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI). Images were evaluated using PI-RR system for mpMRI and the European Association of Nuclear Medicine standardized reporting guidelines (E-PSMA) for PET, with PI-RR and E-PSMA scores dichotomized as ≤2 negative and ≥3 positive for recurrence. Diagnostic performances were assessed using expert-based ground truth establishment.

Results: Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 64.7%, 85.7%, and 74.2%, respectively, for PET and 70.6%, 100%, and 83.9%, respectively, for PI-RR. While PI-RR did not reveal any false positive lesions, five patients with false negative PI-RR results were also negative with PET. In patients with RP, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 44.4%, 100%, and 70.6%, respectively, for PET and 55.6%, 100%, and 76.5%, respectively, for PI-RR. For patients with RT, these values were 87.5%, 66.7%, and 78.6%, respectively, for PET and 87.5%, 100%, and 92.9%, respectively, for PI-RR. There was no significant performance difference between PET or PI-RR in all patients ( P = 0.564), patients with RP ( P = 0.317), or RT ( P = 0.157).

Conclusion: 68 Ga PSMA PET evaluation with E-PSMA and mpMRI interpretation with PI-RR have similar diagnostic performance for detection of local recurrence after RP or RT in PCa.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nuclear Medicine Communications, the official journal of the British Nuclear Medicine Society, is a rapid communications journal covering nuclear medicine and molecular imaging with radionuclides, and the basic supporting sciences. As well as clinical research and commentary, manuscripts describing research on preclinical and basic sciences (radiochemistry, radiopharmacy, radiobiology, radiopharmacology, medical physics, computing and engineering, and technical and nursing professions involved in delivering nuclear medicine services) are welcomed, as the journal is intended to be of interest internationally to all members of the many medical and non-medical disciplines involved in nuclear medicine. In addition to papers reporting original studies, frankly written editorials and topical reviews are a regular feature of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信