溶瘤病毒治疗中晚期实体瘤的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 4 2区 医学 Q2 VIROLOGY
Jin-Zhou Xu, Jian-Xuan Sun, Chen-Qian Liu, Ruo-Yan Pan, Na Zeng, Si-Han Zhang, Ye An, Meng-Yao Xu, Xing-Yu Zhong, Si-Yang Ma, Hao-Dong He, Jia Hu, Shao-Gang Wang, Qi-Dong Xia
{"title":"溶瘤病毒治疗中晚期实体瘤的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Jin-Zhou Xu, Jian-Xuan Sun, Chen-Qian Liu, Ruo-Yan Pan, Na Zeng, Si-Han Zhang, Ye An, Meng-Yao Xu, Xing-Yu Zhong, Si-Yang Ma, Hao-Dong He, Jia Hu, Shao-Gang Wang, Qi-Dong Xia","doi":"10.1128/jvi.00640-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This meta-analysis assessed oncolytic virus therapy's efficacy for intermediate-to-advanced solid tumors. We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases until March 6, 2025. Our review included 87 studies, involving 5,385 individuals, encompassing 75 clinical trials and 12 retrospective studies. Patient response rates were as follows: complete response (CR) 11%, partial response (PR) 18%, stable disease (SD) 32%, and progressive disease (PD) 32%. The overall response rate (ORR) was 29%, and the durable response rate (DRR) was 39%. Comparing oncolytic virus therapy to alternatives, the odds ratio (OR) for overall response was 1.62, and the hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) was 0.86. This analysis emphasizes the effectiveness of oncolytic virus therapy for intermediate-to-advanced solid tumors, highlighting its promise as a treatment option. These findings offer vital insights into cancer therapy researchers and practitioners.IMPORTANCEAlthough previous meta-analyses on this topic have been published, our research addresses the limitations of previous studies by including missed and newly published studies, updating the results, and conducting extensive subgroup analyses. Our study fills a gap in the literature by providing a comprehensive evaluation of the therapeutic potential of oncolytic viruses for solid tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":17583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Virology","volume":" ","pages":"e0064025"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of oncolytic virus in the treatment of intermediate-to-advanced solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jin-Zhou Xu, Jian-Xuan Sun, Chen-Qian Liu, Ruo-Yan Pan, Na Zeng, Si-Han Zhang, Ye An, Meng-Yao Xu, Xing-Yu Zhong, Si-Yang Ma, Hao-Dong He, Jia Hu, Shao-Gang Wang, Qi-Dong Xia\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/jvi.00640-25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This meta-analysis assessed oncolytic virus therapy's efficacy for intermediate-to-advanced solid tumors. We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases until March 6, 2025. Our review included 87 studies, involving 5,385 individuals, encompassing 75 clinical trials and 12 retrospective studies. Patient response rates were as follows: complete response (CR) 11%, partial response (PR) 18%, stable disease (SD) 32%, and progressive disease (PD) 32%. The overall response rate (ORR) was 29%, and the durable response rate (DRR) was 39%. Comparing oncolytic virus therapy to alternatives, the odds ratio (OR) for overall response was 1.62, and the hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) was 0.86. This analysis emphasizes the effectiveness of oncolytic virus therapy for intermediate-to-advanced solid tumors, highlighting its promise as a treatment option. These findings offer vital insights into cancer therapy researchers and practitioners.IMPORTANCEAlthough previous meta-analyses on this topic have been published, our research addresses the limitations of previous studies by including missed and newly published studies, updating the results, and conducting extensive subgroup analyses. Our study fills a gap in the literature by providing a comprehensive evaluation of the therapeutic potential of oncolytic viruses for solid tumors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Virology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0064025\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Virology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.00640-25\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.00640-25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本荟萃分析评估了溶瘤病毒治疗中晚期实体瘤的疗效。我们系统地检索了PubMed、Cochrane Library和Embase数据库,直到2025年3月6日。我们的综述包括87项研究,涉及5385人,包括75项临床试验和12项回顾性研究。患者反应率如下:完全缓解(CR) 11%,部分缓解(PR) 18%,病情稳定(SD) 32%,病情进展(PD) 32%。总缓解率(ORR)为29%,持久缓解率(DRR)为39%。将溶瘤病毒疗法与替代疗法进行比较,总缓解的优势比(OR)为1.62,总生存期(OS)的危险比(HR)为0.86。该分析强调了溶瘤病毒治疗中晚期实体瘤的有效性,强调了其作为一种治疗选择的前景。这些发现为癌症治疗研究人员和从业者提供了重要的见解。虽然之前关于该主题的荟萃分析已经发表,但我们的研究通过纳入遗漏和新发表的研究、更新结果和进行广泛的亚组分析来解决先前研究的局限性。我们的研究填补了文献的空白,提供了溶瘤病毒对实体瘤的治疗潜力的综合评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of oncolytic virus in the treatment of intermediate-to-advanced solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis assessed oncolytic virus therapy's efficacy for intermediate-to-advanced solid tumors. We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases until March 6, 2025. Our review included 87 studies, involving 5,385 individuals, encompassing 75 clinical trials and 12 retrospective studies. Patient response rates were as follows: complete response (CR) 11%, partial response (PR) 18%, stable disease (SD) 32%, and progressive disease (PD) 32%. The overall response rate (ORR) was 29%, and the durable response rate (DRR) was 39%. Comparing oncolytic virus therapy to alternatives, the odds ratio (OR) for overall response was 1.62, and the hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) was 0.86. This analysis emphasizes the effectiveness of oncolytic virus therapy for intermediate-to-advanced solid tumors, highlighting its promise as a treatment option. These findings offer vital insights into cancer therapy researchers and practitioners.IMPORTANCEAlthough previous meta-analyses on this topic have been published, our research addresses the limitations of previous studies by including missed and newly published studies, updating the results, and conducting extensive subgroup analyses. Our study fills a gap in the literature by providing a comprehensive evaluation of the therapeutic potential of oncolytic viruses for solid tumors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Virology
Journal of Virology 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
906
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Virology (JVI) explores the nature of the viruses of animals, archaea, bacteria, fungi, plants, and protozoa. We welcome papers on virion structure and assembly, viral genome replication and regulation of gene expression, genetic diversity and evolution, virus-cell interactions, cellular responses to infection, transformation and oncogenesis, gene delivery, viral pathogenesis and immunity, and vaccines and antiviral agents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信