对同一健康研究人员所经历的社会心理过程的认识论反思。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Global Public Health Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-19 DOI:10.1080/17441692.2025.2509185
Costanza Puppo, Dulce Ferraz, Pascale Frey-Klett, Marie Préau
{"title":"对同一健康研究人员所经历的社会心理过程的认识论反思。","authors":"Costanza Puppo, Dulce Ferraz, Pascale Frey-Klett, Marie Préau","doi":"10.1080/17441692.2025.2509185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the era of the Anthropocene and the ensuing transitions, the One Health approach is one of the possible answers to rethinking our place on the planet. The aim of this article is to propose an epistemological reflection on the psychosocial processes that concern researchers working with the One Health approach, developing some perspectives that have received limited attention to date. We argue for the importance of making these processes explicit, and to focus on the complexity associated with sticking to both a One Health and a community-based approach. Drawing on our experience as researchers engaged in participatory and community-based research in the field of social psychology of health and ecology, and involved in research projects oriented towards the One Health perspective, we outline four key challenges researchers may face: (1) moving beyond anthropocentric conceptions of health, particularly in human medicine, the social sciences, and public health; (2) integrating moral commitments, values, and plural identities into scientific reflection; (3) collaborating with other 'disciplinary communities'; (4) integrating non-academic researchers into the co-construction of science, by legitimising the experiential knowledge. For each challenge, we propose theoretical and methodological tools, conceived as resources to support researchers navigating these transitions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12735,"journal":{"name":"Global Public Health","volume":"20 1","pages":"2509185"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An epistemological reflection on the psychosocial processes experienced by One Health researchers.\",\"authors\":\"Costanza Puppo, Dulce Ferraz, Pascale Frey-Klett, Marie Préau\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17441692.2025.2509185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the era of the Anthropocene and the ensuing transitions, the One Health approach is one of the possible answers to rethinking our place on the planet. The aim of this article is to propose an epistemological reflection on the psychosocial processes that concern researchers working with the One Health approach, developing some perspectives that have received limited attention to date. We argue for the importance of making these processes explicit, and to focus on the complexity associated with sticking to both a One Health and a community-based approach. Drawing on our experience as researchers engaged in participatory and community-based research in the field of social psychology of health and ecology, and involved in research projects oriented towards the One Health perspective, we outline four key challenges researchers may face: (1) moving beyond anthropocentric conceptions of health, particularly in human medicine, the social sciences, and public health; (2) integrating moral commitments, values, and plural identities into scientific reflection; (3) collaborating with other 'disciplinary communities'; (4) integrating non-academic researchers into the co-construction of science, by legitimising the experiential knowledge. For each challenge, we propose theoretical and methodological tools, conceived as resources to support researchers navigating these transitions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Public Health\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"2509185\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2025.2509185\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2025.2509185","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在人类世时代和随后的过渡时期,同一个健康方法是重新思考我们在地球上的位置的可能答案之一。这篇文章的目的是提出一个认识论的反思,涉及研究人员与一个健康的方法工作的社会心理过程,发展一些迄今为止受到有限关注的观点。我们认为明确这些过程的重要性,并将重点放在坚持“一个健康”和以社区为基础的方法的复杂性上。根据我们在健康和生态社会心理学领域从事参与式和基于社区的研究的研究人员的经验,并参与了面向“同一个健康”观点的研究项目,我们概述了研究人员可能面临的四个关键挑战:(1)超越以人类为中心的健康概念,特别是在人类医学、社会科学和公共卫生方面;(2)将道德承诺、价值观和多元身份融入科学反思;(3)与其他“学科团体”合作;(4)通过使经验知识合法化,将非学术研究人员纳入科学的共同建设。对于每一个挑战,我们提出理论和方法工具,设想为资源,以支持研究人员导航这些转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An epistemological reflection on the psychosocial processes experienced by One Health researchers.

In the era of the Anthropocene and the ensuing transitions, the One Health approach is one of the possible answers to rethinking our place on the planet. The aim of this article is to propose an epistemological reflection on the psychosocial processes that concern researchers working with the One Health approach, developing some perspectives that have received limited attention to date. We argue for the importance of making these processes explicit, and to focus on the complexity associated with sticking to both a One Health and a community-based approach. Drawing on our experience as researchers engaged in participatory and community-based research in the field of social psychology of health and ecology, and involved in research projects oriented towards the One Health perspective, we outline four key challenges researchers may face: (1) moving beyond anthropocentric conceptions of health, particularly in human medicine, the social sciences, and public health; (2) integrating moral commitments, values, and plural identities into scientific reflection; (3) collaborating with other 'disciplinary communities'; (4) integrating non-academic researchers into the co-construction of science, by legitimising the experiential knowledge. For each challenge, we propose theoretical and methodological tools, conceived as resources to support researchers navigating these transitions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Public Health
Global Public Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: Global Public Health is an essential peer-reviewed journal that energetically engages with key public health issues that have come to the fore in the global environment — mounting inequalities between rich and poor; the globalization of trade; new patterns of travel and migration; epidemics of newly-emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases; the HIV/AIDS pandemic; the increase in chronic illnesses; escalating pressure on public health infrastructures around the world; and the growing range and scale of conflict situations, terrorist threats, environmental pressures, natural and human-made disasters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信