共同设计和测试卒中后疲劳同伴支持的管理方案:诺丁汉卒中后疲劳研究(NotFAST3)。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-20 DOI:10.1177/02692155251350084
Joanne Ablewhite, Shirley Thomas, Roshan das Nair, Fiona Jones, Nikola Sprigg, Heather Wharrad, Avril Drummond
{"title":"共同设计和测试卒中后疲劳同伴支持的管理方案:诺丁汉卒中后疲劳研究(NotFAST3)。","authors":"Joanne Ablewhite, Shirley Thomas, Roshan das Nair, Fiona Jones, Nikola Sprigg, Heather Wharrad, Avril Drummond","doi":"10.1177/02692155251350084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo develop and test a novel programme to support post-stroke fatigue management for testing in a future clinical trial.DesignStaged approach to development and preliminary testing. Phases 1 and 2: co-design groups held to agree programme content and resources. Phase 3: training for facilitators developed and delivered. Phase 4: feasibility of programme delivery tested with questionnaires completed at beginning and end, and feedback interviews conducted.SettingCommunity, online.ParticipantsStroke survivors with post-stroke fatigue, carers and healthcare professionals.InterventionPost-stroke fatigue management programme supported by 'buddies' with lived or professional experience of managing fatigue.Main measuresIn phase 4, we examined feasibility of programme delivery (recruitment, retention, engagement and acceptability) and preliminary signals of efficacy.ResultsIn phases 1 and 2 we recruited 23 participants (16 stroke survivors, 2 carers and 5 healthcare professionals) and designed resources. In phase 3, 10 people supported training development: 7 received training to be buddies. In phase 4 we recruited 15 people with fatigue; 13 completed the programme. Of these, 13 completed baseline and 12 follow-up questionnaires. All buddies (7/7) and 12/13 participants were interviewed. Mean number of sessions delivered was 9 (SD 3.24; range 3-13) and ranged from 10 to 60 minutes (mean 28 minutes; SD 10.04). Overall, mean fatigue severity reduced, activity increased, and mood measures improved. Participants and buddies were positive about the programme and believed it was worthwhile.ConclusionsThe programme was acceptable and feasible, with preliminary evidence of efficacy, but some issues need to be addressed in future trial design.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1080-1091"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12290229/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-designing and testing a management programme with peer support for post-stroke fatigue: Nottingham fatigue after stroke study (NotFAST3).\",\"authors\":\"Joanne Ablewhite, Shirley Thomas, Roshan das Nair, Fiona Jones, Nikola Sprigg, Heather Wharrad, Avril Drummond\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692155251350084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveTo develop and test a novel programme to support post-stroke fatigue management for testing in a future clinical trial.DesignStaged approach to development and preliminary testing. Phases 1 and 2: co-design groups held to agree programme content and resources. Phase 3: training for facilitators developed and delivered. Phase 4: feasibility of programme delivery tested with questionnaires completed at beginning and end, and feedback interviews conducted.SettingCommunity, online.ParticipantsStroke survivors with post-stroke fatigue, carers and healthcare professionals.InterventionPost-stroke fatigue management programme supported by 'buddies' with lived or professional experience of managing fatigue.Main measuresIn phase 4, we examined feasibility of programme delivery (recruitment, retention, engagement and acceptability) and preliminary signals of efficacy.ResultsIn phases 1 and 2 we recruited 23 participants (16 stroke survivors, 2 carers and 5 healthcare professionals) and designed resources. In phase 3, 10 people supported training development: 7 received training to be buddies. In phase 4 we recruited 15 people with fatigue; 13 completed the programme. Of these, 13 completed baseline and 12 follow-up questionnaires. All buddies (7/7) and 12/13 participants were interviewed. Mean number of sessions delivered was 9 (SD 3.24; range 3-13) and ranged from 10 to 60 minutes (mean 28 minutes; SD 10.04). Overall, mean fatigue severity reduced, activity increased, and mood measures improved. Participants and buddies were positive about the programme and believed it was worthwhile.ConclusionsThe programme was acceptable and feasible, with preliminary evidence of efficacy, but some issues need to be addressed in future trial design.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1080-1091\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12290229/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251350084\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251350084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的开发和测试一种支持脑卒中后疲劳管理的新方案,为未来的临床试验提供支持。设计阶段的开发和初步测试方法。第一阶段和第二阶段:共同设计小组商定节目内容和资源。第3阶段:开发和交付促进器的培训。第四阶段:测试方案实施的可行性,在开始和结束时完成问卷调查,并进行反馈访谈。SettingCommunity,在线。参与者:中风后疲劳的幸存者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员。干预措施卒中后疲劳管理方案,由具有管理疲劳的生活或专业经验的“伙伴”支持。在第4阶段,我们检查了项目交付的可行性(招聘、保留、参与和可接受性)和有效性的初步信号。结果在第一和第二阶段,我们招募了23名参与者(16名中风幸存者,2名护理人员和5名医护人员)并设计了资源。在第三阶段,10人支持培训发展:7人接受了成为伙伴的培训。在第四阶段,我们招募了15名疲劳患者;13人完成课程。其中13人完成了基线调查问卷,12人完成了后续调查问卷。所有的伙伴(7/7)和12/13参与者进行了访谈。平均治疗次数为9次(SD 3.24;范围3-13),范围从10到60分钟(平均28分钟;SD 10.04)。总体而言,平均疲劳程度降低,活动量增加,情绪测量改善。参与者和伙伴们对这个项目都持积极态度,认为这是值得的。结论该方案是可接受和可行的,有初步的疗效证据,但在未来的试验设计中仍需解决一些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Co-designing and testing a management programme with peer support for post-stroke fatigue: Nottingham fatigue after stroke study (NotFAST3).

ObjectiveTo develop and test a novel programme to support post-stroke fatigue management for testing in a future clinical trial.DesignStaged approach to development and preliminary testing. Phases 1 and 2: co-design groups held to agree programme content and resources. Phase 3: training for facilitators developed and delivered. Phase 4: feasibility of programme delivery tested with questionnaires completed at beginning and end, and feedback interviews conducted.SettingCommunity, online.ParticipantsStroke survivors with post-stroke fatigue, carers and healthcare professionals.InterventionPost-stroke fatigue management programme supported by 'buddies' with lived or professional experience of managing fatigue.Main measuresIn phase 4, we examined feasibility of programme delivery (recruitment, retention, engagement and acceptability) and preliminary signals of efficacy.ResultsIn phases 1 and 2 we recruited 23 participants (16 stroke survivors, 2 carers and 5 healthcare professionals) and designed resources. In phase 3, 10 people supported training development: 7 received training to be buddies. In phase 4 we recruited 15 people with fatigue; 13 completed the programme. Of these, 13 completed baseline and 12 follow-up questionnaires. All buddies (7/7) and 12/13 participants were interviewed. Mean number of sessions delivered was 9 (SD 3.24; range 3-13) and ranged from 10 to 60 minutes (mean 28 minutes; SD 10.04). Overall, mean fatigue severity reduced, activity increased, and mood measures improved. Participants and buddies were positive about the programme and believed it was worthwhile.ConclusionsThe programme was acceptable and feasible, with preliminary evidence of efficacy, but some issues need to be addressed in future trial design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信