转移性乳腺癌患者的痛苦温度计和心理痛苦的决定因素。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Huihui Sun, Huimin Lv, Limin Niu, Shumin Chen, Zhiqing Zhang, Min Yan
{"title":"转移性乳腺癌患者的痛苦温度计和心理痛苦的决定因素。","authors":"Huihui Sun, Huimin Lv, Limin Niu, Shumin Chen, Zhiqing Zhang, Min Yan","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2025-005431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is generally considered an incurable disease, and patients require continuous systematic treatment. Receiving the diagnosis and treatment of MBC is a distressing experience that may accelerate an episode of psychological disorder. This study examined the performance of the distress thermometer (DT) and identified the risk factors associated with psychological distress (PD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed 337 patients diagnosed with MBC in Henan Cancer Hospital. All patients completed the electronic DT and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) online. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis compared DT accuracy against HADS-Total score (HADS-T) defined PD (HADS≥15). Multivariate regression identified PD-associated factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DT average scores were significantly higher in HADS-T≥15 patients (4.27 vs 2.01, p<0.001). In ROC analysis, the DT showed strong discriminatory power relative to the HADS diagnosis of depression and anxiety, with an area under the curve of 0.76. A score of 4 represented the optimal trade-off between sensitivity (0.58) and specificity (0.85) characteristics for detecting distress. PD was associated with (unstandardised coefficient (B)=1.663, p=0.04) curative effect, and patients with poorer therapeutic effects experience more distress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The single-item DT has been determined to be a valid tool for screening distress in patients with MBC. We recommend using a cut-off score of 4 in this population. While our analysis revealed a significant association between poor treatment response and elevated distress scores, these findings cohere with the broader clinical imperative to prioritise distress management for all cancer patients regardless of treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distress thermometer and determinants of psychological distress in metastatic breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Huihui Sun, Huimin Lv, Limin Niu, Shumin Chen, Zhiqing Zhang, Min Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/spcare-2025-005431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is generally considered an incurable disease, and patients require continuous systematic treatment. Receiving the diagnosis and treatment of MBC is a distressing experience that may accelerate an episode of psychological disorder. This study examined the performance of the distress thermometer (DT) and identified the risk factors associated with psychological distress (PD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed 337 patients diagnosed with MBC in Henan Cancer Hospital. All patients completed the electronic DT and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) online. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis compared DT accuracy against HADS-Total score (HADS-T) defined PD (HADS≥15). Multivariate regression identified PD-associated factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DT average scores were significantly higher in HADS-T≥15 patients (4.27 vs 2.01, p<0.001). In ROC analysis, the DT showed strong discriminatory power relative to the HADS diagnosis of depression and anxiety, with an area under the curve of 0.76. A score of 4 represented the optimal trade-off between sensitivity (0.58) and specificity (0.85) characteristics for detecting distress. PD was associated with (unstandardised coefficient (B)=1.663, p=0.04) curative effect, and patients with poorer therapeutic effects experience more distress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The single-item DT has been determined to be a valid tool for screening distress in patients with MBC. We recommend using a cut-off score of 4 in this population. While our analysis revealed a significant association between poor treatment response and elevated distress scores, these findings cohere with the broader clinical imperative to prioritise distress management for all cancer patients regardless of treatment outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2025-005431\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2025-005431","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:转移性乳腺癌(MBC)通常被认为是一种无法治愈的疾病,患者需要持续的系统治疗。接受MBC的诊断和治疗是一种痛苦的经历,可能会加速心理障碍的发作。本研究考察了困扰温度计(DT)的表现,并确定了与心理困扰(PD)相关的危险因素。方法:对河南省肿瘤医院确诊为MBC的337例患者进行评价。所有患者均在线完成电子DT和医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)。受试者工作特征(ROC)分析比较DT准确度与HADS- total score (HADS- t)定义的PD (HADS≥15)。多元回归确定了pd相关因素。结果:在HADS-T≥15的患者中,DT平均得分显著更高(4.27 vs 2.01, p)。结论:单项DT已被确定为筛查MBC患者窘迫的有效工具。我们建议在这一人群中使用4分的临界值。虽然我们的分析揭示了不良治疗反应与痛苦评分升高之间的显著关联,但这些发现与更广泛的临床必要性相一致,即优先考虑所有癌症患者的痛苦管理,而不管治疗结果如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distress thermometer and determinants of psychological distress in metastatic breast cancer.

Background: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is generally considered an incurable disease, and patients require continuous systematic treatment. Receiving the diagnosis and treatment of MBC is a distressing experience that may accelerate an episode of psychological disorder. This study examined the performance of the distress thermometer (DT) and identified the risk factors associated with psychological distress (PD).

Methods: We assessed 337 patients diagnosed with MBC in Henan Cancer Hospital. All patients completed the electronic DT and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) online. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis compared DT accuracy against HADS-Total score (HADS-T) defined PD (HADS≥15). Multivariate regression identified PD-associated factors.

Results: DT average scores were significantly higher in HADS-T≥15 patients (4.27 vs 2.01, p<0.001). In ROC analysis, the DT showed strong discriminatory power relative to the HADS diagnosis of depression and anxiety, with an area under the curve of 0.76. A score of 4 represented the optimal trade-off between sensitivity (0.58) and specificity (0.85) characteristics for detecting distress. PD was associated with (unstandardised coefficient (B)=1.663, p=0.04) curative effect, and patients with poorer therapeutic effects experience more distress.

Conclusion: The single-item DT has been determined to be a valid tool for screening distress in patients with MBC. We recommend using a cut-off score of 4 in this population. While our analysis revealed a significant association between poor treatment response and elevated distress scores, these findings cohere with the broader clinical imperative to prioritise distress management for all cancer patients regardless of treatment outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance. We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication. In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信