埃塞俄比亚Omo-Gibe河上游流域潜在含水层排水带的多准则决策分析和地理空间方法

IF 2.2 4区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Legesse Begashaw , Tenalem Ayenew , Taye Alemayehu
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚Omo-Gibe河上游流域潜在含水层排水带的多准则决策分析和地理空间方法","authors":"Legesse Begashaw ,&nbsp;Tenalem Ayenew ,&nbsp;Taye Alemayehu","doi":"10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2025.105734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Groundwater potential regions in the upper Omo-Gibe River basin were identified using the geospatial and multi-criteria decision-making methods. The groundwater area delineations in the sub-basin were estimated by geology, slope, topographic wetness index, land use land cover, soil texture, lineament density, recharge, and distance from rivers. Multicollinearity tests conducted before layer combination confirmed that none of the eight thematic layers utilized in the research demonstrated collinearity problems. The identified groundwater potential regions within the basin are very high (15 %), high (24 %), moderate (30 %), low (23 %), and very low (8 %) groundwater potential regions. The predicted groundwater prospect map was validated via well yields using the receiver operating characteristic curve, extending an area of 79 %. The validation of the model result using specific capacity and transmissivity displays the correlation coefficients of R<sup>2</sup> 0.71 and 0.77, respectively. Moreover, the map removal sensitivity analysis indicated that recharge and geology are the most sensitive parameters of groundwater availability, with sensitivity indices of 2.5 % and 2.16 %, respectively. However, the topographic wetness index with a sensitivity index (SI) of −1.55 % is the least sensitive factor, exhibiting an insignificant impact on identifying the groundwater potential areas. The findings of an integrated approach are important for developing sustainable water resources management strategies in the basin.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14874,"journal":{"name":"Journal of African Earth Sciences","volume":"230 ","pages":"Article 105734"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-criteria decision analysis and geospatial methods for identifying potential aquifer discharge zones in the upper Omo-Gibe River basin, Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"Legesse Begashaw ,&nbsp;Tenalem Ayenew ,&nbsp;Taye Alemayehu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2025.105734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Groundwater potential regions in the upper Omo-Gibe River basin were identified using the geospatial and multi-criteria decision-making methods. The groundwater area delineations in the sub-basin were estimated by geology, slope, topographic wetness index, land use land cover, soil texture, lineament density, recharge, and distance from rivers. Multicollinearity tests conducted before layer combination confirmed that none of the eight thematic layers utilized in the research demonstrated collinearity problems. The identified groundwater potential regions within the basin are very high (15 %), high (24 %), moderate (30 %), low (23 %), and very low (8 %) groundwater potential regions. The predicted groundwater prospect map was validated via well yields using the receiver operating characteristic curve, extending an area of 79 %. The validation of the model result using specific capacity and transmissivity displays the correlation coefficients of R<sup>2</sup> 0.71 and 0.77, respectively. Moreover, the map removal sensitivity analysis indicated that recharge and geology are the most sensitive parameters of groundwater availability, with sensitivity indices of 2.5 % and 2.16 %, respectively. However, the topographic wetness index with a sensitivity index (SI) of −1.55 % is the least sensitive factor, exhibiting an insignificant impact on identifying the groundwater potential areas. The findings of an integrated approach are important for developing sustainable water resources management strategies in the basin.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of African Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"230 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105734\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of African Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1464343X25002018\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of African Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1464343X25002018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用地理空间和多准则决策方法,确定了奥莫吉贝河上游地下水潜力区。利用地质、坡度、地形湿度指数、土地利用、土地覆被、土壤质地、沉积物密度、补给以及与河流的距离等因素对子流域的地下水区域进行了圈定。在层组合之前进行的多重共线性测试证实,研究中使用的八个主题层都没有共线性问题。盆地内确定的地下水潜力区为极高(15%)、高(24%)、中等(30%)、低(23%)和极低(8%)。利用接收器工作特征曲线,通过井产量对预测的地下水远景图进行了验证,将面积扩大了79%。利用比容和透射率对模型结果进行验证,相关系数R2分别为0.71和0.77。此外,地图去除敏感性分析表明,补给和地质是地下水可利用性最敏感的参数,敏感性指数分别为2.5%和2.16%。而地形湿度指数敏感性指数(SI)为- 1.55%,是最不敏感的因子,对识别地下水潜势区影响不显著。综合方法的结果对于在该流域制定可持续水资源管理战略具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-criteria decision analysis and geospatial methods for identifying potential aquifer discharge zones in the upper Omo-Gibe River basin, Ethiopia
Groundwater potential regions in the upper Omo-Gibe River basin were identified using the geospatial and multi-criteria decision-making methods. The groundwater area delineations in the sub-basin were estimated by geology, slope, topographic wetness index, land use land cover, soil texture, lineament density, recharge, and distance from rivers. Multicollinearity tests conducted before layer combination confirmed that none of the eight thematic layers utilized in the research demonstrated collinearity problems. The identified groundwater potential regions within the basin are very high (15 %), high (24 %), moderate (30 %), low (23 %), and very low (8 %) groundwater potential regions. The predicted groundwater prospect map was validated via well yields using the receiver operating characteristic curve, extending an area of 79 %. The validation of the model result using specific capacity and transmissivity displays the correlation coefficients of R2 0.71 and 0.77, respectively. Moreover, the map removal sensitivity analysis indicated that recharge and geology are the most sensitive parameters of groundwater availability, with sensitivity indices of 2.5 % and 2.16 %, respectively. However, the topographic wetness index with a sensitivity index (SI) of −1.55 % is the least sensitive factor, exhibiting an insignificant impact on identifying the groundwater potential areas. The findings of an integrated approach are important for developing sustainable water resources management strategies in the basin.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of African Earth Sciences
Journal of African Earth Sciences 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
240
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of African Earth Sciences sees itself as the prime geological journal for all aspects of the Earth Sciences about the African plate. Papers dealing with peripheral areas are welcome if they demonstrate a tight link with Africa. The Journal publishes high quality, peer-reviewed scientific papers. It is devoted primarily to research papers but short communications relating to new developments of broad interest, reviews and book reviews will also be considered. Papers must have international appeal and should present work of more regional than local significance and dealing with well identified and justified scientific questions. Specialised technical papers, analytical or exploration reports must be avoided. Papers on applied geology should preferably be linked to such core disciplines and must be addressed to a more general geoscientific audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信