Ahmed Alamri, Mohammad Alshehri, Laila Alrajhi, Alexandra Cristea
{"title":"mooc认证预测:系统文献综述","authors":"Ahmed Alamri, Mohammad Alshehri, Laila Alrajhi, Alexandra Cristea","doi":"10.1145/3743671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have been proliferating, offering free or low-cost content for learners. Nevertheless, the certification rate of both free and paid courses has been low (between 4.5% - 13% and 1% - 3%, respectively). Thus, this study aims to survey MOOCs certification predictive models, synthesise results for a comprehensive and deep understanding of this field and explore how these models contributed to addressing the very low certification level. We adopted the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) for transparently conducting the present review and reporting the results from the works reviewed. Additionally, this SLR highlights several trends and limitations within the present predictive models, including some methodological concerns: the extent to which the present models are generalisable, the excessive filtration of the experimental population, the incompatibility of some experiments with real-time scenarios (nonrealistic modelling), and the shallow reporting of model performances. We have also discussed the replicability of the present models and ongoing efforts towards building a state-of-the-art predictive model. Finally, we highlight future research opportunities in the field of MOOC certification prediction that either deal with the limitations of the present models or address unanswered questions.","PeriodicalId":50926,"journal":{"name":"ACM Computing Surveys","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":23.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of Certification in MOOCs: A Systematic Literature Review\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Alamri, Mohammad Alshehri, Laila Alrajhi, Alexandra Cristea\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3743671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have been proliferating, offering free or low-cost content for learners. Nevertheless, the certification rate of both free and paid courses has been low (between 4.5% - 13% and 1% - 3%, respectively). Thus, this study aims to survey MOOCs certification predictive models, synthesise results for a comprehensive and deep understanding of this field and explore how these models contributed to addressing the very low certification level. We adopted the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) for transparently conducting the present review and reporting the results from the works reviewed. Additionally, this SLR highlights several trends and limitations within the present predictive models, including some methodological concerns: the extent to which the present models are generalisable, the excessive filtration of the experimental population, the incompatibility of some experiments with real-time scenarios (nonrealistic modelling), and the shallow reporting of model performances. We have also discussed the replicability of the present models and ongoing efforts towards building a state-of-the-art predictive model. Finally, we highlight future research opportunities in the field of MOOC certification prediction that either deal with the limitations of the present models or address unanswered questions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Computing Surveys\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":23.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Computing Surveys\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3743671\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Computing Surveys","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3743671","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prediction of Certification in MOOCs: A Systematic Literature Review
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have been proliferating, offering free or low-cost content for learners. Nevertheless, the certification rate of both free and paid courses has been low (between 4.5% - 13% and 1% - 3%, respectively). Thus, this study aims to survey MOOCs certification predictive models, synthesise results for a comprehensive and deep understanding of this field and explore how these models contributed to addressing the very low certification level. We adopted the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) for transparently conducting the present review and reporting the results from the works reviewed. Additionally, this SLR highlights several trends and limitations within the present predictive models, including some methodological concerns: the extent to which the present models are generalisable, the excessive filtration of the experimental population, the incompatibility of some experiments with real-time scenarios (nonrealistic modelling), and the shallow reporting of model performances. We have also discussed the replicability of the present models and ongoing efforts towards building a state-of-the-art predictive model. Finally, we highlight future research opportunities in the field of MOOC certification prediction that either deal with the limitations of the present models or address unanswered questions.
期刊介绍:
ACM Computing Surveys is an academic journal that focuses on publishing surveys and tutorials on various areas of computing research and practice. The journal aims to provide comprehensive and easily understandable articles that guide readers through the literature and help them understand topics outside their specialties. In terms of impact, CSUR has a high reputation with a 2022 Impact Factor of 16.6. It is ranked 3rd out of 111 journals in the field of Computer Science Theory & Methods.
ACM Computing Surveys is indexed and abstracted in various services, including AI2 Semantic Scholar, Baidu, Clarivate/ISI: JCR, CNKI, DeepDyve, DTU, EBSCO: EDS/HOST, and IET Inspec, among others.