Emilio Portaccio, Matteo Betti, Ermelinda De Meo, Luisa Pastò, Lorenzo Razzolini, Francesco Patti, Vincenzo Brescia Morra, Giovanna De Luca, Carlo Pozzilli, Carla Tortorella, Eleonora Cocco, Giuseppe Salemi, Diana Ferraro, Marika Vianello, Giacomo Lus, Alessandra Lugaresi, Matilde Inglese, Gioacchino Tedeschi, Sara Montepietra, Alessia Di Sapio, Mauro Zaffaroni, Pietro Iaffaldano, Marta Simone, Massimo Filippi, Maria Trojano, Maria Pia Amato
{"title":"复发性多发性硬化症初始高效治疗的年龄依赖性反应。","authors":"Emilio Portaccio, Matteo Betti, Ermelinda De Meo, Luisa Pastò, Lorenzo Razzolini, Francesco Patti, Vincenzo Brescia Morra, Giovanna De Luca, Carlo Pozzilli, Carla Tortorella, Eleonora Cocco, Giuseppe Salemi, Diana Ferraro, Marika Vianello, Giacomo Lus, Alessandra Lugaresi, Matilde Inglese, Gioacchino Tedeschi, Sara Montepietra, Alessia Di Sapio, Mauro Zaffaroni, Pietro Iaffaldano, Marta Simone, Massimo Filippi, Maria Trojano, Maria Pia Amato","doi":"10.1177/13524585251345317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the impact of age on the superiority of highly effective (HE) disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) compared to platform DMTs in a real-world population of relapsing MS patients (pwMS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 20,984 pwMS were extracted from the Italian Multiple Sclerosis Register with a diagnosis of Clinically Isolated Syndrome or Relapsing-Remitting MS, at least four Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) evaluations and 2 years follow-up, starting DMT. The baseline was the nearest visit to the first DMT starting date. The risk of first 24-week confirmed disability accumulation (CDA) on EDSS in HE versus platform DMTs after 2 years and the entire follow-up was assessed through Cox regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 1:1 propensity score matching, we evaluated 1698 pwMS initiating HE-DMTs and 1698 initiating platforms. After 2 years follow-up, the proportion of CDA events was lower in patients on HE-DMTs (12.2%) than those on platform DMTs (15%), as confirmed by Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.10-0.47; <i>p</i> < 0.001). HE-DMTs were more effective in patients under 45 years of age (HR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.39-0.63; <i>p</i> < 0.001), but not in patients over 45 (HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.54-1.08, <i>p</i> = 0.125). Notably, prolonged exposure to any DMT during follow-up reduced disability accumulation even in patients over 45 (HR = 0.13, 95% CI = 0.02-0.99; <i>p</i> = 0.050).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This real-world study of relapsing pwMS demonstrates that the benefit of initial HE treatment diminishes with age. However, even in older patients, DMT exposure, regardless of the efficacy level, appears to reduce disability accumulation, and so, on an individual level, initial HE treatment could still be more effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":520714,"journal":{"name":"Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)","volume":" ","pages":"13524585251345317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Age-dependent response to initial highly effective treatment in relapsing multiple sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Emilio Portaccio, Matteo Betti, Ermelinda De Meo, Luisa Pastò, Lorenzo Razzolini, Francesco Patti, Vincenzo Brescia Morra, Giovanna De Luca, Carlo Pozzilli, Carla Tortorella, Eleonora Cocco, Giuseppe Salemi, Diana Ferraro, Marika Vianello, Giacomo Lus, Alessandra Lugaresi, Matilde Inglese, Gioacchino Tedeschi, Sara Montepietra, Alessia Di Sapio, Mauro Zaffaroni, Pietro Iaffaldano, Marta Simone, Massimo Filippi, Maria Trojano, Maria Pia Amato\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13524585251345317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the impact of age on the superiority of highly effective (HE) disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) compared to platform DMTs in a real-world population of relapsing MS patients (pwMS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 20,984 pwMS were extracted from the Italian Multiple Sclerosis Register with a diagnosis of Clinically Isolated Syndrome or Relapsing-Remitting MS, at least four Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) evaluations and 2 years follow-up, starting DMT. The baseline was the nearest visit to the first DMT starting date. The risk of first 24-week confirmed disability accumulation (CDA) on EDSS in HE versus platform DMTs after 2 years and the entire follow-up was assessed through Cox regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 1:1 propensity score matching, we evaluated 1698 pwMS initiating HE-DMTs and 1698 initiating platforms. After 2 years follow-up, the proportion of CDA events was lower in patients on HE-DMTs (12.2%) than those on platform DMTs (15%), as confirmed by Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.10-0.47; <i>p</i> < 0.001). HE-DMTs were more effective in patients under 45 years of age (HR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.39-0.63; <i>p</i> < 0.001), but not in patients over 45 (HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.54-1.08, <i>p</i> = 0.125). Notably, prolonged exposure to any DMT during follow-up reduced disability accumulation even in patients over 45 (HR = 0.13, 95% CI = 0.02-0.99; <i>p</i> = 0.050).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This real-world study of relapsing pwMS demonstrates that the benefit of initial HE treatment diminishes with age. However, even in older patients, DMT exposure, regardless of the efficacy level, appears to reduce disability accumulation, and so, on an individual level, initial HE treatment could still be more effective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13524585251345317\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585251345317\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585251345317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:在现实世界的多发性硬化症复发患者(pwMS)中,评估年龄对高效(HE)疾病改善治疗(DMTs)与平台dmt的优越性的影响。方法:从意大利多发性硬化症登记册中提取了20,984例诊断为临床孤立综合征或复发-缓解型多发性硬化症的pwMS,至少进行了四次扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)评估,随访2年,开始DMT。基线是距离第一次DMT开始日期最近的访问。通过Cox回归模型评估2年后HE与平台dmt在EDSS上第一个24周确认残疾积累(CDA)的风险。结果:经过1:1的倾向评分匹配,我们评估了1698个pwMS启动he - dmt和1698个启动平台。随访2年后,Cox回归分析证实,he - dmt组患者的CDA事件比例(12.2%)低于平台dmt组(15%)(风险比(HR) = 0.22, 95%可信区间(CI) = 0.10-0.47;P < 0.001)。HE-DMTs在45岁以下患者中更有效(HR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.39-0.63;p < 0.001),但在45岁以上的患者中没有(HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.54-1.08, p = 0.125)。值得注意的是,即使在45岁以上的患者中,随访期间长时间暴露于任何DMT也能减少残疾积累(HR = 0.13, 95% CI = 0.02-0.99;P = 0.050)。结论:这项对复发性pwMS的现实研究表明,初始HE治疗的益处随着年龄的增长而减少。然而,即使在老年患者中,DMT暴露,不管疗效如何,似乎可以减少残疾积累,因此,在个人层面上,初始HE治疗仍然可能更有效。
Age-dependent response to initial highly effective treatment in relapsing multiple sclerosis.
Objectives: To assess the impact of age on the superiority of highly effective (HE) disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) compared to platform DMTs in a real-world population of relapsing MS patients (pwMS).
Methods: A total of 20,984 pwMS were extracted from the Italian Multiple Sclerosis Register with a diagnosis of Clinically Isolated Syndrome or Relapsing-Remitting MS, at least four Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) evaluations and 2 years follow-up, starting DMT. The baseline was the nearest visit to the first DMT starting date. The risk of first 24-week confirmed disability accumulation (CDA) on EDSS in HE versus platform DMTs after 2 years and the entire follow-up was assessed through Cox regression models.
Results: After 1:1 propensity score matching, we evaluated 1698 pwMS initiating HE-DMTs and 1698 initiating platforms. After 2 years follow-up, the proportion of CDA events was lower in patients on HE-DMTs (12.2%) than those on platform DMTs (15%), as confirmed by Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.10-0.47; p < 0.001). HE-DMTs were more effective in patients under 45 years of age (HR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.39-0.63; p < 0.001), but not in patients over 45 (HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.54-1.08, p = 0.125). Notably, prolonged exposure to any DMT during follow-up reduced disability accumulation even in patients over 45 (HR = 0.13, 95% CI = 0.02-0.99; p = 0.050).
Conclusion: This real-world study of relapsing pwMS demonstrates that the benefit of initial HE treatment diminishes with age. However, even in older patients, DMT exposure, regardless of the efficacy level, appears to reduce disability accumulation, and so, on an individual level, initial HE treatment could still be more effective.