以病人为中心的评估行为健康危机护理的结果框架。

IF 3.2
Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-19 DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.20250040
Ashlyn Burns, Emily Meanwell, Justin Blackburn, Zachary Adams, Leslie Hulvershorn, Bernice Pescosolido
{"title":"以病人为中心的评估行为健康危机护理的结果框架。","authors":"Ashlyn Burns, Emily Meanwell, Justin Blackburn, Zachary Adams, Leslie Hulvershorn, Bernice Pescosolido","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20250040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recent federal investments have accelerated a nationwide transformation of the behavioral health crisis care (BHCC) system, raising pertinent questions about quality and effectiveness. In response to calls to collect more data and define outcomes for assessing BHCC, this study sought to identify patient-centered outcomes (PCOs) from the perspectives of individuals with lived experience of a behavioral disorder and individuals who have delivered BHCC services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Via a multiphased recruitment approach, qualitative interviews were conducted with 120 stakeholders: peers with lived experience (N=21), direct-service providers (N=47), program directors and managers (N=44), and executive leaders (N=8). All interview transcripts were analyzed by using an open coding approach to generate emerging themes that captured measurable components of BHCC and outcomes of interest meaningful to stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A PCO framework for evaluating BHCC was developed by mapping emerging themes to a conceptual framework adapted from Donabedian's structure-process-outcome model. Forty-five themes were identified and grouped under five domains: system structure, system implementation, system use, social outcomes, and health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although further efforts are needed to engage patients and providers in the process of developing specific measures, this framework provides a starting point for PCO research on BHCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":520759,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)","volume":" ","pages":"834-845"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Patient-Centered Outcomes Framework for Evaluating Behavioral Health Crisis Care.\",\"authors\":\"Ashlyn Burns, Emily Meanwell, Justin Blackburn, Zachary Adams, Leslie Hulvershorn, Bernice Pescosolido\",\"doi\":\"10.1176/appi.ps.20250040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recent federal investments have accelerated a nationwide transformation of the behavioral health crisis care (BHCC) system, raising pertinent questions about quality and effectiveness. In response to calls to collect more data and define outcomes for assessing BHCC, this study sought to identify patient-centered outcomes (PCOs) from the perspectives of individuals with lived experience of a behavioral disorder and individuals who have delivered BHCC services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Via a multiphased recruitment approach, qualitative interviews were conducted with 120 stakeholders: peers with lived experience (N=21), direct-service providers (N=47), program directors and managers (N=44), and executive leaders (N=8). All interview transcripts were analyzed by using an open coding approach to generate emerging themes that captured measurable components of BHCC and outcomes of interest meaningful to stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A PCO framework for evaluating BHCC was developed by mapping emerging themes to a conceptual framework adapted from Donabedian's structure-process-outcome model. Forty-five themes were identified and grouped under five domains: system structure, system implementation, system use, social outcomes, and health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although further efforts are needed to engage patients and providers in the process of developing specific measures, this framework provides a starting point for PCO research on BHCC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"834-845\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20250040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20250040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:最近的联邦投资加速了全国范围内行为健康危机护理(BHCC)系统的转型,提出了有关质量和有效性的相关问题。为了响应收集更多数据和定义BHCC评估结果的呼吁,本研究试图从有行为障碍生活经历的个体和提供BHCC服务的个体的角度确定以患者为中心的结果(PCOs)。方法:采用多阶段招聘方法,对120名利益相关者进行了定性访谈:有实际经验的同行(N=21),直接服务提供者(N=47),项目主管和经理(N=44),以及执行领导(N=8)。通过使用开放编码方法对所有访谈记录进行分析,以生成捕获BHCC可测量成分的新主题和对利益相关者有意义的感兴趣的结果。结果:通过将新兴主题映射到改编自Donabedian的结构-过程-结果模型的概念框架,开发了评估BHCC的PCO框架。确定了45个主题,并将其分为五个领域:系统结构、系统实施、系统使用、社会结果和健康结果。结论:虽然在制定具体措施的过程中需要进一步努力使患者和提供者参与其中,但该框架为BHCC PCO研究提供了一个起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Patient-Centered Outcomes Framework for Evaluating Behavioral Health Crisis Care.

Objective: Recent federal investments have accelerated a nationwide transformation of the behavioral health crisis care (BHCC) system, raising pertinent questions about quality and effectiveness. In response to calls to collect more data and define outcomes for assessing BHCC, this study sought to identify patient-centered outcomes (PCOs) from the perspectives of individuals with lived experience of a behavioral disorder and individuals who have delivered BHCC services.

Methods: Via a multiphased recruitment approach, qualitative interviews were conducted with 120 stakeholders: peers with lived experience (N=21), direct-service providers (N=47), program directors and managers (N=44), and executive leaders (N=8). All interview transcripts were analyzed by using an open coding approach to generate emerging themes that captured measurable components of BHCC and outcomes of interest meaningful to stakeholders.

Results: A PCO framework for evaluating BHCC was developed by mapping emerging themes to a conceptual framework adapted from Donabedian's structure-process-outcome model. Forty-five themes were identified and grouped under five domains: system structure, system implementation, system use, social outcomes, and health outcomes.

Conclusions: Although further efforts are needed to engage patients and providers in the process of developing specific measures, this framework provides a starting point for PCO research on BHCC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信