教育用虚拟现实外科模拟的研究趋势:系统综述。

Changhyun Choi, Hongrae Kim, Dae Kyung Sohn
{"title":"教育用虚拟现实外科模拟的研究趋势:系统综述。","authors":"Changhyun Choi, Hongrae Kim, Dae Kyung Sohn","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2025.28.2.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a transformative tool in surgical education, offering a controlled and repeatable training environment that mitigates ethical and legal challenges associated with traditional apprenticeship models. By simulating real-life surgical scenarios, VR allows trainees to practice procedures safely while improving skill acquisition and procedural efficiency. In this study, we systematically reviewed research trends in VR-based surgical education to provide insights into its current applications and future potential.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, identifying 395 studies. Of these, 92 studies met predefined inclusion criteria and were selected for analysis. The selected studies were analyzed based on publication period, surgical procedure, medical specialty, country of origin, and outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study findings revealed that research on VR surgical simulation peaked between 2005 and 2009, followed by a decline in recent years. Laparoscopic and endoscopic training were the most frequently studied procedures, with general surgery and gastroenterology being the most predominant specialties. The United States contributed the highest number of publications. Common outcome measures for evaluating VR training effectiveness included time, movement economy, subject evaluation, error rates, proficiency scales, and accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings illustrate the historical trajectory and current landscape of VR use in surgical training. While the initial surge in interest has waned, VR remains a valuable tool for procedural skill development, particularly in laparoscopic and endoscopic training, and its future potential may depend on improvements in realism, cost-efficiency, and curriculum integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"28 2","pages":"51-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12179675/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research trends in virtual reality surgical simulation for education: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Changhyun Choi, Hongrae Kim, Dae Kyung Sohn\",\"doi\":\"10.7602/jmis.2025.28.2.51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a transformative tool in surgical education, offering a controlled and repeatable training environment that mitigates ethical and legal challenges associated with traditional apprenticeship models. By simulating real-life surgical scenarios, VR allows trainees to practice procedures safely while improving skill acquisition and procedural efficiency. In this study, we systematically reviewed research trends in VR-based surgical education to provide insights into its current applications and future potential.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, identifying 395 studies. Of these, 92 studies met predefined inclusion criteria and were selected for analysis. The selected studies were analyzed based on publication period, surgical procedure, medical specialty, country of origin, and outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study findings revealed that research on VR surgical simulation peaked between 2005 and 2009, followed by a decline in recent years. Laparoscopic and endoscopic training were the most frequently studied procedures, with general surgery and gastroenterology being the most predominant specialties. The United States contributed the highest number of publications. Common outcome measures for evaluating VR training effectiveness included time, movement economy, subject evaluation, error rates, proficiency scales, and accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings illustrate the historical trajectory and current landscape of VR use in surgical training. While the initial surge in interest has waned, VR remains a valuable tool for procedural skill development, particularly in laparoscopic and endoscopic training, and its future potential may depend on improvements in realism, cost-efficiency, and curriculum integration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of minimally invasive surgery\",\"volume\":\"28 2\",\"pages\":\"51-61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12179675/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of minimally invasive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2025.28.2.51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2025.28.2.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:虚拟现实(VR)已经成为外科教育的一种变革性工具,它提供了一个可控的、可重复的培训环境,减轻了与传统学徒模式相关的道德和法律挑战。通过模拟真实的手术场景,VR允许受训者安全地练习手术,同时提高技能获得和手术效率。在本研究中,我们系统地回顾了基于vr的外科教育的研究趋势,以提供其当前应用和未来潜力的见解。方法:在PubMed上进行综合文献检索,获得395篇研究。其中,92项研究符合预定义的纳入标准,并被选中进行分析。根据发表期、手术方式、医学专业、原产国和结局指标对入选研究进行分析。结果:研究结果显示,VR手术模拟的研究在2005年至2009年达到顶峰,近年来呈下降趋势。腹腔镜和内窥镜训练是最常见的学习程序,普通外科和胃肠病学是最主要的专业。美国的出版物数量最多。评估VR训练效果的常见结果指标包括时间、动作经济性、受试者评估、错误率、熟练程度量表和准确性。结论:这些发现说明了VR在外科训练中应用的历史轨迹和现状。虽然最初的兴趣激增已经减弱,但VR仍然是程序技能发展的宝贵工具,特别是在腹腔镜和内窥镜培训中,其未来的潜力可能取决于现实性,成本效率和课程整合的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research trends in virtual reality surgical simulation for education: a systematic review.

Purpose: Virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a transformative tool in surgical education, offering a controlled and repeatable training environment that mitigates ethical and legal challenges associated with traditional apprenticeship models. By simulating real-life surgical scenarios, VR allows trainees to practice procedures safely while improving skill acquisition and procedural efficiency. In this study, we systematically reviewed research trends in VR-based surgical education to provide insights into its current applications and future potential.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, identifying 395 studies. Of these, 92 studies met predefined inclusion criteria and were selected for analysis. The selected studies were analyzed based on publication period, surgical procedure, medical specialty, country of origin, and outcome measures.

Results: Study findings revealed that research on VR surgical simulation peaked between 2005 and 2009, followed by a decline in recent years. Laparoscopic and endoscopic training were the most frequently studied procedures, with general surgery and gastroenterology being the most predominant specialties. The United States contributed the highest number of publications. Common outcome measures for evaluating VR training effectiveness included time, movement economy, subject evaluation, error rates, proficiency scales, and accuracy.

Conclusion: These findings illustrate the historical trajectory and current landscape of VR use in surgical training. While the initial surge in interest has waned, VR remains a valuable tool for procedural skill development, particularly in laparoscopic and endoscopic training, and its future potential may depend on improvements in realism, cost-efficiency, and curriculum integration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信