透析行业的金融关系、市场结构、商业价格和医疗主管薪酬。

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Xuyang Xia, Wanrong Deng, Paul J Eliason, Riley J League, Ryan C McDevitt, James W Roberts, Heather Wong
{"title":"透析行业的金融关系、市场结构、商业价格和医疗主管薪酬。","authors":"Xuyang Xia, Wanrong Deng, Paul J Eliason, Riley J League, Ryan C McDevitt, James W Roberts, Heather Wong","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.2659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Growing consolidation in the dialysis industry has raised concerns about market power and the potential need for antitrust enforcement, but a lack of data previously prevented a systematic analysis of these issues.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To document the consolidation of dialysis facilities through chain ownership and vertical integration between dialysis facilities and physicians, as well as study associations between consolidation and commercial prices for outpatient hemodialysis and medical director compensation.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This economic evaluation combined data from Freedom of Information Act requests, Medicare claims, cost reports, commercial prices, and physician registries to conduct a retrospective study of market structure, compensation, and prices in the dialysis industry from 2005 to 2019. Those evaluated include dialysis facilities in the US, physicians involved with dialysis for patients enrolled in Medicare, and patients with end-stage renal disease enrolled in Medicare or one of the commercial insurers in claims data provided by the Health Care Cost Institute. Data were analyzed from April 2024 to April 2025.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Chain ownership, physician ownership, and medical directorship of dialysis facilities in the US from 2005 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Chain ownership of dialysis facilities, share of population living in markets with different levels of chain ownership, share of facilities with physician owners, levels of medical director compensation, and commercial prices for outpatient hemodialysis in markets with different numbers of chain- and physician-owned facilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2005 and 2019, the market share of DaVita and Fresenius increased from 59.1% to 77.1%, with 32.5% of the national population living in a hospital service area (HSA) without access to a dialysis facility other than these 2 chains in 2019. The share of facilities with a physician owner increased from 11.4% to 29.1%. Markets with only 1 large chain had $495.08 (95% CI, $371.21-$619.85) higher mean commercial prices for outpatient hemodialysis and $564.56 (95% CI, $429.03-$700.10) higher medical director compensation per patient than markets that did not have large chain facilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this economic evaluation, market concentration in the US dialysis industry increased from 2005 to 2019 and was associated with higher commercial prices for outpatient hemodialysis. Physician ownership of facilities also increased, and medical directors received higher pay in markets where large chains operate.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 6","pages":"e252659"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12177639/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financial Ties, Market Structure, Commercial Prices, and Medical Director Compensation in Dialysis.\",\"authors\":\"Xuyang Xia, Wanrong Deng, Paul J Eliason, Riley J League, Ryan C McDevitt, James W Roberts, Heather Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.2659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Growing consolidation in the dialysis industry has raised concerns about market power and the potential need for antitrust enforcement, but a lack of data previously prevented a systematic analysis of these issues.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To document the consolidation of dialysis facilities through chain ownership and vertical integration between dialysis facilities and physicians, as well as study associations between consolidation and commercial prices for outpatient hemodialysis and medical director compensation.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This economic evaluation combined data from Freedom of Information Act requests, Medicare claims, cost reports, commercial prices, and physician registries to conduct a retrospective study of market structure, compensation, and prices in the dialysis industry from 2005 to 2019. Those evaluated include dialysis facilities in the US, physicians involved with dialysis for patients enrolled in Medicare, and patients with end-stage renal disease enrolled in Medicare or one of the commercial insurers in claims data provided by the Health Care Cost Institute. Data were analyzed from April 2024 to April 2025.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Chain ownership, physician ownership, and medical directorship of dialysis facilities in the US from 2005 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Chain ownership of dialysis facilities, share of population living in markets with different levels of chain ownership, share of facilities with physician owners, levels of medical director compensation, and commercial prices for outpatient hemodialysis in markets with different numbers of chain- and physician-owned facilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2005 and 2019, the market share of DaVita and Fresenius increased from 59.1% to 77.1%, with 32.5% of the national population living in a hospital service area (HSA) without access to a dialysis facility other than these 2 chains in 2019. The share of facilities with a physician owner increased from 11.4% to 29.1%. Markets with only 1 large chain had $495.08 (95% CI, $371.21-$619.85) higher mean commercial prices for outpatient hemodialysis and $564.56 (95% CI, $429.03-$700.10) higher medical director compensation per patient than markets that did not have large chain facilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this economic evaluation, market concentration in the US dialysis industry increased from 2005 to 2019 and was associated with higher commercial prices for outpatient hemodialysis. Physician ownership of facilities also increased, and medical directors received higher pay in markets where large chains operate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"volume\":\"6 6\",\"pages\":\"e252659\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12177639/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.2659\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.2659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:透析行业日益增长的整合引发了对市场力量和反垄断执法潜在需求的担忧,但此前缺乏数据阻碍了对这些问题的系统分析。目的:通过透析机构和医生之间的连锁所有制和垂直整合来记录透析机构的整合,并研究整合与门诊血液透析商业价格和医疗主任薪酬之间的关系。设计、设置和参与者:本经济评估结合了来自《信息自由法》请求、医疗保险索赔、成本报告、商业价格和医生注册的数据,对2005年至2019年透析行业的市场结构、薪酬和价格进行了回顾性研究。评估对象包括美国的透析设施、参与医疗保险患者透析的医生、医疗保险登记的终末期肾病患者或医疗保健成本研究所提供的索赔数据中的商业保险公司之一。数据分析时间为2024年4月至2025年4月。曝光:2005年至2019年,美国透析设施的连锁所有权、医生所有权和医疗董事。主要结果和措施:透析设施的连锁所有权,不同连锁所有权水平市场的人口份额,医生所有者的设施份额,医疗主任薪酬水平,以及不同连锁和医生拥有设施数量市场中门诊血液透析的商业价格。结果:从2005年到2019年,DaVita和费森尤斯的市场份额从59.1%上升到77.1%,到2019年,32.5%的全国人口生活在医院服务区(HSA),除了这两家连锁店之外,没有透析设施。拥有医生的医疗设施的比例从11.4%增加到29.1%。与没有大型连锁机构的市场相比,只有一家大型连锁机构的市场门诊血液透析的平均商业价格高出495.08美元(95% CI, 371.21美元至619.85美元),每位患者的医疗主任薪酬高出564.56美元(95% CI, 429.03美元至700.10美元)。结论和相关性:在这项经济评估中,美国透析行业的市场集中度从2005年到2019年有所增加,并与门诊血液透析的较高商业价格相关。医生对医疗设施的所有权也有所增加,在大型连锁经营的市场,医疗主管的薪酬也有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Financial Ties, Market Structure, Commercial Prices, and Medical Director Compensation in Dialysis.

Importance: Growing consolidation in the dialysis industry has raised concerns about market power and the potential need for antitrust enforcement, but a lack of data previously prevented a systematic analysis of these issues.

Objective: To document the consolidation of dialysis facilities through chain ownership and vertical integration between dialysis facilities and physicians, as well as study associations between consolidation and commercial prices for outpatient hemodialysis and medical director compensation.

Design, setting, and participants: This economic evaluation combined data from Freedom of Information Act requests, Medicare claims, cost reports, commercial prices, and physician registries to conduct a retrospective study of market structure, compensation, and prices in the dialysis industry from 2005 to 2019. Those evaluated include dialysis facilities in the US, physicians involved with dialysis for patients enrolled in Medicare, and patients with end-stage renal disease enrolled in Medicare or one of the commercial insurers in claims data provided by the Health Care Cost Institute. Data were analyzed from April 2024 to April 2025.

Exposure: Chain ownership, physician ownership, and medical directorship of dialysis facilities in the US from 2005 to 2019.

Main outcomes and measures: Chain ownership of dialysis facilities, share of population living in markets with different levels of chain ownership, share of facilities with physician owners, levels of medical director compensation, and commercial prices for outpatient hemodialysis in markets with different numbers of chain- and physician-owned facilities.

Results: Between 2005 and 2019, the market share of DaVita and Fresenius increased from 59.1% to 77.1%, with 32.5% of the national population living in a hospital service area (HSA) without access to a dialysis facility other than these 2 chains in 2019. The share of facilities with a physician owner increased from 11.4% to 29.1%. Markets with only 1 large chain had $495.08 (95% CI, $371.21-$619.85) higher mean commercial prices for outpatient hemodialysis and $564.56 (95% CI, $429.03-$700.10) higher medical director compensation per patient than markets that did not have large chain facilities.

Conclusions and relevance: In this economic evaluation, market concentration in the US dialysis industry increased from 2005 to 2019 and was associated with higher commercial prices for outpatient hemodialysis. Physician ownership of facilities also increased, and medical directors received higher pay in markets where large chains operate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信